Skip to main content
Log in

Do Certified Mail Third-Wave Follow-ups Really Boost Response Rates and Quality?

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Total Design Method (TDM) of designing and implementing mail surveys has been shown to achieve high response rates. One key step in the TDM is sending a third-wave of surveys by certified mail. However, little research exists to verify the effectiveness of this step in improving response rates and quality relative to its increased expense, although this is the 50th anniversary of certified mail in the U.S. Perhaps as a result, scholars rarely use certified mail third-waves or omit third-wave mailings altogether. This article presents the results of two experiments that we embedded in two large-scale organizational mail surveys. Both studies reveal that sending a third-wave of questionnaires significantly increases the rate of response over the first two waves of mailings. Also, the results of Study 1 show that sending a certified mail third-wave has no appreciable effect on response quality. Study 2 shows that a certified mail third-wave does not significantly increase response rate or quality compared to sending the third-wave by regular, 1st-class mail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abhijit, Roy and Paul D. Berger. (2005). “E-Mail and Mixed Mode Database Surveys Revisited: Exploratory Analyses of Factors Affecting Response Rates,” Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management 12(2), 153–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. Scott and Terry S. Overton. (1977). “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys,” Journal of Marketing Research 14(August), 396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, Norman M. (1992). “Presidential Address: A Response to the Nonresponse Problem,” Public Opinion Quarterly 56(Fall), 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobanoglu, Cihan, Bill Warde, and Patrick J Moreo. (2001). “A Comparison of Mail, Fax, and Web-Based Surveys,” International Journal of Market Research 43(4), 441–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutskens, Elisabeth, Ko De Ruyter, Martin Wetzels, and Paul Oosterveld. (2004). “Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-Based Surveys: An Experimental Study,” Marketing Letters 15(1), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, Donald A. (1972). “Increasing Mail Questionnaire Response in Large Samples of the General Public,” Public Opinion Quarterly 36(Summer), 254–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, Donald A. (2000), Mail and Internet Surveys : The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, Donald A. (1983). “Mail and Other Self-Administered Questionnaires.” In Handbook of Survey Research Peter H. Rossi, James D. Wright, and Andy B. Anderson (Eds). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc., 359–377.

  • Dillman, Donald A. (1978), Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, Donald A., James A. Christenson, Edwin H. Carpenter, and Ralph M. Brooks. (1974). “Increasing Mail Questionnaire Response: A Four State Comparison,” American Sociological Review 39(October), 744–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckland, B. K. (1965). “Effects of Prodding to Increase Mail-Back Returns,” Journal of Applied Psychology 49, 165–169.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan, B. Zafer and Michael J. Baker. (2002). “Increasing Mail Survey Response Rates from an Industrial Population,” Industrial Marketing Management 31 (January), 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Robert, Frank McLaughlin, and Steven Williamson. (1992). “Using Certified Mail in Industrial Research,” Industrial Marketing Management 21(November), 281–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Christine M., K. Lynne Robinson, and Debra Boardley. (1998). “Cost-Effectiveness of Follow-up Strategies in Improving the Response Rate of Mail Surveys,” Industrial Marketing Management 27(March), 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Richard J., Melvin R. Crask, and Jonghoon Kim. (1988). “Mail Survey Response Rate: A Meta-Analysis of Selected Techniques for Inducing Response,” Public Opinion Quarterly 52(Winter), 467–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, Kenneth R. (1979). “The Consequences of Large Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys of Elites,” Public Opinion Quarterly 43(3), 378–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulet, Valdemar M. (1977). “Efficacy of a Third Request Letter in Mail Surveys of Professionals,” Journal of Marketing Research 14 (February), 112–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, Thomas V., Nuchai Chuchinprakarn, and Sudhindra Seshadri. (2000). “Likelihood of Participating in Mail Survey Research,” Industrial Marketing Management 29(March), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, Robert M., Robert B. Cialdini, and Mick P. Couper. (1992). “Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey,” Public Opinion Quarterly 56(Winter), 475–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggett, Sarah and Vincent-Wayne Mitchell. (1994). “Effect of Industrial Prenotification on Response Rate, Speed, Quality, Bias, and Cost,” Industrial Marketing Management 23(April), 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Robert A. (1980). “A Self-Perception Interpretation of the Effect of Monetary and Nonmonetary Incentives on Mail Survey Respondent Behavior,” Journal of Marketing Research 17(February), 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, James S., Wayne Gerber, and Anthony J. McMichael. (1977). “Increasing Mail Questionnaire Response: A Controlled Replication and Extension,” Public Opinion Quarterly 41(Spring), 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, Michael J. and Neil M. Ford. (1976). “Broadening the Scope of Methodological Research on Mail Surveys,” Journal of Marketing Research 13(November), 397–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobber, David and Daragh O'Reilly. (1998). “Industrial Mail Surveys: A Methodological Update,” Industrial Marketing Management 27(March), 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobber, David and Daragh O'Reilly. (1996). “Industrial Mail Surveys: Techniques for Inducing Response,” Marketing Intelligence & Planning 14(1), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplowitz, Michael D., Timothy D. Hadlock, and Ralph Levine. (2004). “A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates,” Public Opinion Quarterly 68(Spring), 94–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuw, E. D. de and J. J. Hox. (1988). “Artifacts in Mail Surveys: The Influence of Dillman's Total Design Method on the Quality of the Responses.” In Sociometric Research, Willem E. Saris and Irmtraud N. Gallhofer (Eds.), Vol. 2. New York: St. Martin's Press 61–73.

  • Linsky, Arnold S. (1975). “Stimulating Responses to Mailed Questionnaires: A Review,” Public Opinion Quarterly 39(Spring), 82–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, Stephen W. and C.P. Rao. (1980). “The Effect of Monetary Inducement on Mailed Questionnaire Response Quality,” Journal of Marketing Research 17(May), 265–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxson, M. Chris. (1992). “Follow-up Mail Surveys,” Industrial Marketing Management 21(August), 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, David R. and Don A. Dillman. (1998). “Development of a Standard E-Mail Methodology,” Public Opinion Quarterly 62(3), 378–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Kenneth C. and James C. Johnson. (1995). “Stimulating Response to Market Surveys of Business Professionals,” Industrial Marketing Management 24(Aug.), 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tedin, Kent L. and Richard Hofstetter. (1982). “The Effect of Cost and Importance Factors on the Return Rate for Single and Multiple Mailings,” Public Opinion Quarterly 46, 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wotruba, Thomas R. (1966). “Monetary Inducements and Mail Questionnaire Response,” Journal of Marketing Research 3(Nov.), 398–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yammarino, Francis J., Steven J. Skinner, and Terry L. Childers. (1991). “Understanding Mail Survey Response Behavior: A Meta-Analysis,” Public Opinion Quarterly 55(Winter), 613–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Julie and Harris Cooper. (1983). “A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires,” Journal of Marketing Research 20(Feb.), 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zou, Shaoming and S. Tamer Cavusgil. (2002). “The GMS: A Broad Conceptualization of Global Marketing Strategy and Its Effect on Firm Performance,” Journal of Marketing 66(Jan.), 40–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey B. Schmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, J.B., Calantone, R.J., Griffin, A. et al. Do Certified Mail Third-Wave Follow-ups Really Boost Response Rates and Quality?. Market Lett 16, 129–141 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-2291-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-2291-7

Keywords

Navigation