Abstract
The need to evaluate a single brand in isolation, without explicit comparisons to competitors, is ubiquitous in consumer judgment because competitors are often not readily apparent. Although consumers routinely make such judgments, in this paper we show that when a brand is judged in isolation, the judgment is often overly favorable. Moreover, we explore when and why this tendency occurs. Data from 259 participants across 3 experiments that considered very different product categories, and that were conducted with student and adult consumer samples, converge to show that; (1) isolated brand evaluations on average are characterized by a favorableness bias, (2) this bias results from consumers' selective processing of information about the focal brand, (3) favorableness bias is attenuated if context leads consumers to consider alternatives to a salient focal brand, and (4) the isolated brand judgments of experts are much better calibrated than are those of novices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alicke, Mark D., M. L. Klotz, David L. Breitenbecher, Tricia J. Yurak, and Debbie S. Vrendenburg. (1995). “Personal Contact, Individuation, and the Better-than-Average Effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68(May), 804–825.
Brenner, Lyle A., Derek J. Koehler, and Amos Tversky. (1996). “On the Evaluation of One-Sided Evidence,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 9(March), 59–70.
Griffin, Dale W. and Lee Ross. (1991). “Subjective Construal, Social Influence, and Human Misunderstanding,” In Mark P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press, Vol. 24, pp. 319–359.
Hill, Julianne. (2003). “Fresh POP-ed,” Promo, April 1.
Houghton, David C. and Frank R. Kardes. (1998). “Market Share Overestimation and the Noncomplementarity Effect,” Marketing Letters 9(August), 313–320.
Hsee, Christopher K. and France Leclerc. (1998). “Will Products Look More Attractive When Presented Separately or Together?rdquo; Journal of Consumer Research 25(September), 175–186.
Kardes, Frank R., Maria L. Cronley, James J. Kellaris, and Steven S. Posavac. (2004). “The Role of Selective Information Processing in Price-Quality Inference,” Journal of Consumer Research 31(September), 368–374.
Klayman, Joshua and Young-won Ha. (1989). “Hypothesis Testing in Rule Discovery: Strategy, Structure, and Content,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 15(July), 596–604.
Klar, Yechiel and Eilath E. Giladi. (1997). “No One in My Group can be Below the Group's Average: A Robust Positivity Bias in Favor of Anonymous Peers,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73(November), 885–901.
Menon, Geeta, Lauren G. Block, and Suresh Ramanathan. (2002). “We're at as Much Risk as We Are Led to Believe: Effects of Message Cues on Judgments of Health Risk,” Journal of Consumer Research 28(March), 533–549.
Meyvis, Tom and Chris Janiszewski. (2002). “Consumers' Beliefs about Product Benefits: The Effect of Obviously Irrelevant Product Information,” Journal of Consumer Research 28(March), 618–635.
Mussweiler, Thomas. (2003). “Comparison Processes in Social Judgment: Mechanisms and Consequences,”Psychological Review 110(July), 472–489.
Posavac, Steven S., David M. Sanbonmatsu, Frank R. Kardes, and Gavan J. Fitzsimons. (2004). “The Brand Positivity Effect: When Evaluation Confers Preference,”Journal of Consumer Research 31(December), 643–651.
Sanbonmatsu, David M., Steven S. Posavac, Frank R. Kardes, and Susan P. Mantel. (1998). “Selective Hypothesis Testing,” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5(June), 197–220.
Sengupta, Jaideep and Gita Venkataramani Johar. (2002). “Effects of Inconsistent Attribute Information on the Predictive Value of Product Attitudes: Toward a Resolution of Opposing Perspectives,” Journal of Consumer Research 29(June), 39–56.
Windschitl, Paul D., Justin Kruger, and Ericka Nus Simms. (2003). “The Influence of Egocentrism and Focalism on People's Optimism in Competitions: When What Affects Us Equally Affects Me More,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(September), 389–408.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Posavac, S.S., Kardes, F.R., Sanbonmatsu, D.M. et al. Blissful Insularity: When Brands are Judged in Isolation from Competitors. Market Lett 16, 87–97 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-1433-2
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-005-1433-2