Abstract
The world is moving towards applying intelligent technologies in automobiles, with focus on the development of autonomous vehicles. These vehicles are equipped with devices to predict and avoid dangerous situations such as vehicle crashes, pedestrian hits, etc. Such devices are mostly used in pre-crash management but not during crash. Hence, there is a requirement of smart crash energy absorption system that works during crashes and modulates its energy absorption capability as per the severity of crash. Thus, the proposed methodology involves development of mathematical modelling and dynamic simulation of a four-stage collision energy absorption system. The Dodge Neon vehicle is considered as a base model with 4 DoF lumped parameter modelling (LPM). The proposed model is equipped with four impact absorption elements such as a bumper, magneto rheological absorber (MRA), spring, and a piston-cylinder with shear plate assembly, that are in series. The MRA is an intelligent device which plays a vital role to make a system to be smart or semi-active by adjusting the crash absorbing capability while altering the power distribution to MRA as per the severity of crash. The modified Bouc-Wen model is utilized for MRA, which is non-linear in nature, and the spring-dashpot model has been considered for other elements of the proposed system. Dynamic expressions have been derived and simulated to validate the capability of the proposed model against the existing base model. The proposed model exhibits great capability in terms of displacement, deceleration, and time of crash of the occupant’s cabin. The proposed design can also be utilized for the electrical vehicles (EVs) as an add-on system because of the absence of crushable mechanical elements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. However, in the case of any further clarifications, the readers may please contact the corresponding author.”
Abbreviations
- α, α a :
-
Evolutionary coefficients, N/m
- α b :
-
Evolutionary coefficient varying linearly with the applied voltage, N V−1 m−1
- β, γ :
-
Hysteresis parameters of yield elements, m−2
- A :
-
Dimensionless quantity controlling the behaviour of the model
- c 0 :
-
Viscous damping coefficient at high velocities, N s/m
- c 0a, c 1a :
-
Damping coefficient related to c0 and c1, N s/m
- c 0b, c 1b :
-
Damping coefficient related to c0 and c1 varying linearly with the applied voltage, N s V−1 m−1
- c 1 :
-
Viscous damping coefficient at low velocities, N s/m
- E max :
-
Maximum energy absorbed, J
- F max :
-
Maximum damping force, N
- F MR :
-
Damping force, N
- k 0 :
-
Stiffness at high velocities, N/m
- k 1 :
-
Accumulator stiffness, N/m
- n :
-
Exponential parameter that varies between 1 to 2.
- V :
-
Voltage applied, V
- u :
-
Filtered voltage, V
- \(\dot{u}\) :
-
Derivative of filtered voltage, V/s
- η :
-
Coefficient of first order voltage filter, s−1
- x 0 :
-
Initial displacement of spring k1, m
- x rel :
-
Relative displacement, m
- y :
-
Displacement of the piston, m
- z :
-
Evolutionary displacement component, m
- \(\dot{z}\) :
-
Evolutionary velocity component, m/s
- c :
-
Damping constant of bumper, N s/m
- c 1b, c 2b, c 3b :
-
Damping elements of frontal parts of the vehicle, N s/m
- c 3 :
-
Damping constant corresponding to stage-4, N s/m
- F 1 :
-
Force at stage-1, N
- F 3 :
-
Force at stage-3, N
- F 4 :
-
Force at stage-4, N
- k :
-
Stiffness of bumper, N/m
- k 1b, k 2b, k 3b :
-
Stiffness of frontal parts of the vehicle, N/m
- k 2 :
-
Conventional spring stiffness for stage-3, N/m
- k 3 :
-
Stiffness corresponding to stage-4, N/m
- M 1 :
-
Mass of suspension and lower longitudinal structural members, kg
- M 2 :
-
Mass of engine, engine cradle, and upper longitudinal structural members, kg
- M 3 :
-
Mass of fire wall and part of body on its back, kg
- M 4 :
-
Mass of occupant’s cabin, kg
- T peak :
-
Time to reach peak entity, s
- \(x_{1} ,x_{2} ,x_{3} ,x_{4}\) :
-
Displacement of M1, M2, M3, and M4, m
- \(\dot{x}_{1} ,\dot{x}_{2} ,\dot{x}_{3} ,\dot{x}_{4}\) :
-
Velocity of M1, M2, M3, and M4, m/s
- \(\ddot{x}_{1} ,\ddot{x}_{2} ,\ddot{x}_{3} ,\ddot{x}_{4}\) :
-
Acceleration of M1, M2, M3, and M4, m/s2
- V i :
-
Initial velocity of the vehicle, m/s
References
Ahamed, R., Choi, S.B., Ferdaus, M.M.: A state of art on magneto-rheological materials and their potential applications. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 29, 2051–2095 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X18754350
Archakam, P.K., Muthuswamy, S.: Design and simulation of a crash energy absorption system integrated with magneto-rheological absorber. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 9, 1635–1656 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-021-00318-6
Azar, B.F., Veladi, H., Talatahari, S., Raeesi, F.: Optimal design of magnetorheological damper based on tuning Bouc-Wen model parameters using hybrid algorithms. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 24, 867–878 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-0988-z
Bompos, D.A., Nikolakopoulos, P.G.: CFD simulation of magnetorheological fluid journal bearings. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory. 19, 1035–1060 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2011.01.001
Cao, L., Wang, H., Wu, J., Chen, H.: Study on a pneumatic automatic-extendable crash energy absorption system. Adv. Mater. Res. 455–456, 1509–1514 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.455-456.1509
Elmarakbi, A.M., Zu, J.W.: Crash analysis and modeling of two vehicles in frontal collisions using two types of smart front-end structures: an analytical approach using IHBM. Int. J. Crashworthiness. 11, 467–483 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1533/ijcr.2005.0117
Eshkabilov, S.: Modeling and simulation of non-linear and hysteresis behavior of magneto-rheological dampers in the example of quarter-car model. Commun. Control Sci. Eng. 4, 12–29 (2016)
Gao, X., Niu, J., Liu, Z., Tian, J.: Semi-active control of ambulance stretcher system based on parallel mechanism with MR dampers and perturbation analysis. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 15, 817–831 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-019-09444-2
Goher, K.M., Chenhui, K., Fadlallah, S.O., Shabibi, A.M.A., Rawahi, N.Z.A.: Transient dynamic impact suppression of a Baja chassis using frontal and rear shock absorbers. Int. J. Crashworthiness. 22, 676–688 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2017.1301081
Hao, F., Lu, X., Qiao, Y., Chen, X.: Crashworthiness analysis of electric vehicle with energy-absorbing battery modules. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. Trans. ASME. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035498
Jain, S., Sreekumar, M.: The preliminary design of a collision energy absorption system. In: 6th International 27th All India Manufacturing Technologhy Design Research Conference, Pune, INDIA. 779–782 (2016)
Jawad, S.: Smart structures for frontal collision mitigation. SAE Tech. Pap. 1, (2002). https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-0247
Jiang, K., Wen, J.: Identification of nonlinear hysteretic systems using sequence model-based optimization. Struct Control Heal. Monit. 27, 1–24 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2500
Kachhwaha, S.S., Singh, M.K., Sahu, D.P., Sahu, N.K.: Analysis of smart front-end structure in frontal crash mitigation. In: In: Deepak, B., Parhi, D., Jena, P. (eds) Innovative Product Design and Intelligent Manufacturing Systems. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. pp. 631–639. Springer, Singapore (2020)
Khattab, A., & ElRahman, A.: Investigation of an adaptable crash energy management system to enhance vehicle crashworthiness (2010)
Krishna, H., Kumar, H., Gangadharan, K.: Optimization of magneto-rheological damper for maximizing magnetic flux density in the fluid flow gap through FEA and GA approaches. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. c. 98, 533–539 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-016-0251-z
Liu, X., Gao, X., Yu, H., Ye, D.: Dynamic performance of different metal foam magnetorheological fluid materials. IEEE Trans. Magn. 51, 1–5 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2015.2450682
Liu, G., Gao, F., Wang, D., Liao, W.-H.: Medical applications of magnetorheological fluid: a systematic review. Smart Mater. Struct. 31, 043002 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/AC54E7
Marzbanrad, J., Pahlavani, M.: Calculation of vehicle-lumped model parameters considering occupant deceleration in frontal crash. Int. J. Crashworthiness. 16, 439–455 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2011.606995
Mei, L., Thole, C.A.: Data analysis for parallel car-crash simulation results and model optimization. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory. 16, 329–337 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2007.11.018
Muthalif, A.G.A., Razali, M.K.M., Nordin, N.H.D., Hamid, S.B.A.: Parametric estimation from empirical data using particle swarm optimization method for different magnetorheological damper models. IEEE Access. 9, 72602–72613 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3080432
http://www.natrip.in/: National Automotive Testing and R&D Infrastructure Project (NATRiP), http://www.natrip.in/
Oh, J.S., Sohn, J.W., Choi, S.B.: Applications of magnetorheological fluid actuator to multi-DOF systems: state-of-the-art from 2015 to 2021. Actuators. 11, 1–25 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/act11020044
Pisetskiy, S., Kermani, M.: High-performance magneto-rheological clutches for direct-drive actuation: design and development. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 32, 2582–2600 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X211006902
Rabinow, J.: The magnetic fluid clutch. Trans. Am. Inst. Electr. Eng. 67, 1308–1315 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AIEE.1948.5059821
Rossi, A., Orsini, F., Scorza, A., Botta, F., Belfiore, N.P., Sciuto, S.A.: A review on parametric dynamic models of magnetorheological dampers and their characterization methods. Actuators. (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/act7020016
Spencer, B.F., Dyke, S.J., Sain, M.K., Carlson, J.D.: Phenomenological model for magnetorheological dampers. J. Eng. Mech. 123, 230–238 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:3(230)
Spencer, B.F., Yang, G., Carlson, J.D., Sain, M.K.: Smart dampers for seismic protection of structures : A full-scale study. In: Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Structural Control. pp. 1–10 (1998)
Suvarna, N., Raju, A., Hegde, S.: A review of magneto rheological fluid in suspension and torsional devices. AIP Conf. Proc. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0036249
Talatahari, S., Kaveh, A., Mohajer Rahbari, N.: Parameter identification of Bouc-Wen model for MR fluid dampers using adaptive charged system search optimization. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 26, 2523–2534 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-012-0625-y
Xiao, Y., Yin, H., Fang, H., Wen, G.: Crashworthiness design of horsetail-bionic thin-walled structures under axial dynamic loading. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 12, 563–576 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-016-9341-6
Yuan, X., Tian, T., Ling, H., Qiu, T., He, H.: A review on structural development of magnetorheological fluid damper. Shock Vib. 2019, 1–33 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1498962
Zhi Shen, W., Hong Bo, W., Tiantian, G., Xu Hui, L.: Parameter optimization of a metal foam magneto-rheological damper. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 16, 323–330 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-019-09463-z
Zhu, X., Jing, X., Cheng, L.: Magnetorheological fluid dampers: A review on structure design and analysis. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 23, 839–873 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X12436735
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Archakam, P.K., Muthuswamy, S. Modelling and simulation of four-stage collision energy absorption system based on magneto rheological absorber. Int J Mech Mater Des 19, 49–72 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-022-09616-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-022-09616-7