Abstract
This quantitative study investigated the effects of a city’s social responsibility activities on public employees’ organizational identity and engagement to determine if the effects are similar to those found for employees working in the private sector. Research has consistently shown the positive effects of corporate social responsibility efforts on private sector employees’ attitudes and behaviors; however, researchers warn against applying theories developed in the private sector to the public sector without acknowledging the unique motives that attract individuals to the public sector. For example, studies show individuals with higher public service motivation (PSM) are attracted to the public sector because they identify with those in need and prefer helping others through their jobs. Although PSM and social responsibility are distinct, and even seemingly divergent constructs, both constructs offer explanations for how employees’ prosocial activities may be related through the lens of organizational identity, yet studies to-date have not examined the impact of organizational social responsibility (OSR) activities on public sector employees’ attitudes. Our findings revealed employee perceptions of the city’s social responsibility efforts predict employees’ organizational identity and organizational identity fully mediates the relationship between perceptions of social responsibility and employee engagement, suggesting organizational identity develops before employee engagement and could be considered an antecedent of engagement. These results imply that a public agency’s social responsibility initiatives may provide a mechanism for increasing employee engagement. Implications for public managers and theory are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data are available from the corresponding author.
Code availability
Code is available from the corresponding author.
References
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275678
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E., & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Organizational identiy and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 13–17.
Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E., Gioia, D. A., Godfrey, P. C., Reger, R. K., & Whetten, D. A. (1998). Epilogue: What does the concept of identity add to organization science? In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversation (pp. 273–293). Sage.
Ashforth, B. E. (2001). Role transitions in organizational life: An identity-based perspective. Routledge.
Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34(3), 325–374.
Asseburg, J., & Homberg, F. (2020). Public service motivation or sector rewards? Two studies on the determinants of sector attraction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(1), 82–111.
Awan, S., Esteve, M., & van Witteloostuijn, A. (2020). Talking the talk, but not walking the walk: A comparison of self-reported and observed prosocial behaviour. Public Administration, 98, 995–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12664
Bauman, C. W., & Skitka, L. J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 63–86.
Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 555–577. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164633
Borst, R. T., Kruyen, P. M., Lako, C. J., & de Vries, M. S. (2020). The attitudinal, behavioral, and performance outcomes of work engagement: A comparative meta-analysis across the public, semipublic, and private sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19840399
Bozeman, B., & Su, X. (2015). Public service motivation concepts and theory: A critique. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 700–710.
Byrne, B. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Routledge.
Byrne, Z. S., Hayes, T. L., & Holcombe, K. J. (2017). Employee engagement using the federal employee viewpoint survey. Public Personnel Management, 46(4), 368–390.
Carmeli, A., Gilat, G., & Waldman, D. A. (2007). The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 972–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00691.x
Carroll, A. (1979). A three dimensional model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.
Carroll, A. (2000). Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium: Corporate social responsibility and models of management morality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(1), 33–42.
Corduneanu, R., Dudau, A., & Kominis, G. (2020). Crowding-in or crowding-out: The contribution of self-determination theory to public service motivation. Public Management Review, 22(7), 1070–1089.
D’Aprile, G., & Talò, C. (2014). Measuring corporate social responsibility as a psychosocial construct: A new multidimensional scale. Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 26(3), 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-013-9228-8
De Roeck, K., El Akremi, A., & Swaen, V. (2016). Consistency matters! How and when does corporate social responsibility affect employees’ organizational identification? Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1141–1168.
Dimitrova, B. V., Kim, S., Bell, M., & Frantz, N. (2017). Global country social responsibility: what is it? An abstract. Academy of marketing science annual conference (pp. 17–18). Springer.
Doverspike, D., Qin, L., Magee, M. P., Snell, A. F., & Vaiana, L. P. (2011). The public sector as a career choice: Antecedents of an expressed interest in working for the federal government. Public Personnel Management, 40(2), 119–132.
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263.
Ertas, N. (2014). Public service motivation theory and voluntary organizations: Do government employees volunteer more? Nonprofit and Public Sector Quarterly, 43(2), 254–271.
Farooq, M., Farooq, O., & Jasimuddin, S. M. (2014). Employees response to corporate social responsibility: Exploring the role of employees’ collectivist orientation. European Management Journal, 32(6), 916–927.
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
Fu, H., Ye, B. H., & Law, R. (2014). You do well and I do well? The behavioral consequences of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 40, 62–70.
Galvin, B. M., Lange, D., & Ashforth, B. E. (2015). Narcissistic organizational identification: Seeing oneself as central to the organization’s identity. Academy of Management Review, 40(2), 163–181.
Glavas, A., & Kelley, K. (2014). The effects of perceived corporate social responsibility on employee attitudes. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(02), 165–202.
Glavas, A., & Piderit, S. K. (2009). How does doing good matter? Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 36, 51–70.
Grant, A. M., Dutton, J. E., & Rosso, B. D. (2008). Giving commitment: Employee support programs and the prosocial sensemaking process. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 898–918. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.34789652
Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. International Business Society, 39(3), 254–280.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hall, R. J., Snell, A. F., & Foust, M. S. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 2(3), 233–256.
Ho, R. (2013). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis with IBM SPSS (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
IBM. (2019). + SPSS statistics for windows (Version 26). Armonk.
Jones, D. A. (2010). Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 857–878.
Jorgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
Kahn, W. A. (1992). To be fully there: Pschological presense at work. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679204500402
Kim, H. R., Lee, M., Lee, H. T., & Kim, N. M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee–company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 557–569.
Knudsen, J. S., & Brown, D. (2015). Why governments intervene: Exploring mixed motives for public policies on corporate social responsibility. Public Policy and Administration, 30(1), 51–72.
Levitats, Z., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2020). Emotionally engaged civil servants: Toward a multilevel theory and multisource analysis in public administration. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(3), 426–446.
MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. A. (2000). Application of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–226.
Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3–30.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identity, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48(2), 309–333.
Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 455–469.
Mann, G. A. (2006). A motive to serve: Public service motivation in human resource management and the role of PSM in the nonprofit sector. Public Personnel Management, 35(1), 33–48.
Martela, F., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Prosocial behavior increases well-being and vitality even without contact with the beneficiary: Causal and behavioral evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 40(3), 351–357.
Mirvis, P. (2012). Employee engagement and CSR. California Management Review, 54(4), 93–117.
Mone, E., Eisinger, C., Guggenheim, K., Price, B., & Stine, C. (2011). Performance management at the wheel: Driving employee engagement in organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9222-9
Moore, M., & Khagram, S. (2004). On creating public value: What business might learn from government about strategic management. Working paper of the Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Kennedy School of Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Newman, D. (2014). Missing data: Five practical guidelines. Organizational Research Methods, 17(4), 372–411.
Ng, E. S., & Gossett, C. W. (2013). Career choice in Canadian public service: An exploration of fit with the millennial generation. Public Personnel Management, 42(3), 337–358.
Ng, T. W., Yam, K. C., & Aguinis, H. (2019). Employee perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Effects on pride, embeddedness, and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 72(1), 107–137.
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367–373.
Potocan, V., & Nedelko, Z. (2015). A new socio-economic order: Evidence about employees’ values’ influence on corporate social responsibility. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(2), 230–239.
Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations (pp. 171–207). Sage.
Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service ethic. American Review of Public Administration, 16(4), 288–302.
Rich, B. L., Lepine, J., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.
Ritz, A., Brewer, G. A., & Neumann, O. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426.
Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday, S. (2004). The drivers of employee engagement, report 408. Retrieved from http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/system/files/resources/files/408.pdf
Robinson, S., Smith, J., D’Aprile, G., & Mannarini, T. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: A psychosocial multidimensional construct. Journal of Global Responsibility, 3(1), 48–65.
Russell, D. W., Kahn, J. H., Spoth, R., & Altmaier, E. M. (1998). Analyzing data from experimental studies: A latent variable structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(1), 18.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.
Singhapakdi, A., Lee, D. J., Sirgy, M. J., & Senasu, K. (2015). The impact of incongruity between an organization and its employees’ CSR orientation on employees’ quality of work life. Journal of Business Research, 68(1), 60–66.
Stritch, J. M., & Christensen, R. K. (2014). Looking at a job’s social impact through PSM-tinted lenses: Probing the motivation–perception relationship. Public Administration, 92(4), 826–842.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1–39.
Taylor, J. (2010). Public service motivation, civic attitudes and actions of public, nonprofit, and private sector employees. Public Administration, 88(4), 1083–1098.
Thacker, H. (2021a). CSR policies around the world. The CSR Journal. Retrieved March 25, 2021a, from https://thecsrjournal.in/csr-policies-around-the-world/.
Thacker, H. (2021b). Top companies for CSR in China. The CSR Journal. Retrieved July 5, 2021b, from https://thecsrjournal.in/csr-china-corporate-social-responsibility/.
Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 411–427.
Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, operationalization and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 765–802.
Vandenabeele, W. (2008). Government calling: Public service motivation as an element in selecting government as an employer of choice. Public Administration, 86(4), 1089–1105.
Wang, W., Fu, Y., Qiu, H., Moore, J. H., & Wang, Z. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and employee outcomes: A moderated mediation model of organizational identification and moral identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1906.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Sage.
Wheeler, D., & Sillanpaa, M. (1998). Including the stakeholders: The business case. Long Range Planning, 31(2), 10.
Williams, A. M., & Bland, J. T. (2019). Drivers of social engagement: Employee voice–advice sharing relationship. Review of Public Personnel Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19850873
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. No funding was received for conducting this study. No funds, grants, or other support was received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors participated in manuscript preparation and analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.
Consent to participate
Participation in the study was voluntary.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hammon, S.D., Gillis, W.E. & Icenogle, M.L. From social responsibility to employee engagement: evidence from the public sector. J Manag Gov 27, 1223–1247 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09648-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-022-09648-3