Drawing from a sample of French companies that made up the SBF 120 index over the period 2006–2010 (before the enactment of the Copé–Zimmermann law on gender quotas on boards), this paper investigates the relationship between board gender diversity and firm risk-taking (measured by the variability of the return on assets). Using a generalized method of moments estimation, no evidence is found to support the assumption of a significant relationship between women on corporate boards and firm risk-taking. These results potentially can be relevant for policy makers and academic research.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Jianakoplos and Bernasek (1998) underline that “as wealth increases, the proportion of wealth held as risky assets is estimated to increase by a smaller amount for single women than for single men. [Nevertheless], gender differences in financial risk taking are also influenced by age, race and number of children” (p. 620). According to these authors, greater financial risk aversion could partially explain US women's lower levels of wealth compared with men.
Perryman et al. (2016) underline that female executives are paid less than male executives, even at the TMT level. Nevertheless, when gender diversity increases, the salary differences between genders decrease.
SBF stands for the Société des bourses françaises.
Following various financial scandals (e.g. Vivendi Universal), the AFEP and MEDEF (the French Employers’ Association) requested a re-examination in 2002 of French corporate governance principles. The Bouton Report of the same year contained stricter recommendations, regarding, in particular, board independence.
According to the figures supplied by CEDEF (Centre de Documentation Économie-Finances), which is attached to the French Ministry for the Economy and Finance.
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics,94(2), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007.
Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Science,58(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1452.
Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature,48(1), 58–107. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1299212.
Adams, R. B., & Ragunathan, V. (2015). Lehman sisters. Sydney: University of New South Wales: FIRN Research.
Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,127(1), 137–197.
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies,58(2), 277. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968.
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics,68(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-D.
Armstrong, C. S., & Vashishtha, R. (2012). Executive stock options, differential risk-taking incentives, and firm value. Journal of Financial Economics,104(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.11.005.
Arnett, J. J., & Jensen, L. A. (1994). Socialization and risk behavior in two countries: Denmark and the United States. Youth and Society,26(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X94026001001.
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics,116(1), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556400.
Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics,97(2), 207–221.
Bennouri, M., Chtioui, T., Nagati, H., & Nekhili, M. (2018). Female board directorship and firm performance: What really matters? Journal of Banking and Finance,88(March), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.12.010.
Berger, A. N., Kick, T., & Schaeck, K. (2014). Executive board composition and bank risk taking. Journal of Corporate Finance,28(October), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.006.
Bernasek, A., & Shwiff, S. (2001). Gender, risk, and retirement. Journal of Economic Issues,35(2), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2001.11506368.
Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Collier Macmillan.
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics,87(1), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8.
Bøhren, Ø., & Staubo, S. (2014). Does mandatory gender balance work? Changing organizational form to avoid board upheaval. Journal of Corporate Finance,28(October), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.12.005.
Bond, S. R. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Economic Journal,1(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-002-0009-9.
Borghans, L., Heckman, J. J., Golsteyn, B. H. H., & Meijers, H. (2009). Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. Journal of the European Economic Association,7(2/3), 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.649.
Boubakri, N., Cosset, J.-C., & Saffar, W. (2013). The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evidence from privatization. Journal of Financial Economics,108(3), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.12.007.
Bruna, M. G. (2016). Dynamique de changement, exercice de la réflexivité et apprentissage managérial dans la conduite d’une démarche transformationnelle de diversité. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion. https://doi.org/10.3917/rsg.281.0121.
Bruna, M. G., & Bazin, Y. (2018). Answering Levinas’ call in organization studies. European Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12137.
Brunninge, O., Nordqvist, M., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Corporate governance and strategic change in SMEs: The effects of ownership, board composition and top management teams. Small Business Economics,29(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9021-2.
Burt, R. S. (1998). The gender of social capital. Rationality and Society,10(1), 5–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/104346398010001001.
Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,3, 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367.
Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews,12(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x.
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,83(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007.
Chatterjee, S., & Hadi, A. S. (2012). Regression analysis by example. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Chen, S., Ni, X., & Tong, J. Y. (2016). Gender diversity in the boardroom and risk management: A case of R&D investment. Journal of Business Ethics,136(3), 599–621.
Dang, R., Bender, A.-F., & Scotto, M.-J. (2014a). Women on French corporate board of directors: How do they differ from their male counterparts? Journal of Applied Business Research,30(2), 489–507.
Dang, R., Nguyen, D. K., & Vo, L.-C. (2014b). Does the glass ceiling exist? A longitudinal study of women’s progress on French corporate boards. Journal of Applied Business Research,30(3), 909. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v30i3.8576.
Durand, R., & Vargas, V. (2003). Ownership, organization, and private firms’ efficient use of resources. Strategic Management Journal,24(7), 667–675.
Faccio, M., Marchica, M.-T., & Mura, R. (2011). Large shareholder diversification and corporate risk-taking. Review of Financial Studies,24(11), 3601–3641. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhr065.
Faccio, M., Marchica, M.-T., & Mura, R. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance,39(August), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.008.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics,26(2), 301–326.
Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics,81(1), 83–95.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Bosont: Pitman.
Granie, M.-A. (2013). Genre et rapport au risque: De la compréhension au levier pour l’action (Gender and risk assessment: From understanding to lever for action). Questions Vives,9(19), 65–87.
Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics,74(4), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y.
Grosvold, J., & Brammer, S. (2011). National institutional systems as antecedents of female board representation: An empirical study. Corporate Governance: An International Review,19(2), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00830.x.
Gul, F. A., Srinidhi, B., & Ng, A. C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics,51(3), 314–338.
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review,32(4), 1199–1228.
Harrison, D. A., & Sin, H.-P. (2006). What is diversity and how should it be measured? In A. M. Konrad, P. Prasad, & J. K. Pringle (Eds.), Handbook of workplace diversity (pp. 191–216). London: Sage.
Hayes, R. M., Lemmon, M., & Qiu, M. (2012). Stock options and managerial incentives for risk taking: Evidence from FAS 123R. Journal of Financial Economics,105(1), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.01.004.
Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review,88(1), 96–118.
Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Board of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review,9(1), 7–20.
Hilary, G., & Hui, K. W. (2009). Does religion matter in corporate decision making in America? Journal of Financial Economics,93(3), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.001.
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., Jr., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management,28(6), 747–763.
Huang, J., & Kisgen, D. J. (2013). Gender and corporate finance: Are male executives overconfident relative to female executives? Journal of Financial Economics,108(3), 822–839.
Hutchinson, M., Mack, J., & Plastow, K. (2015). Who selects the ‘right’ directors? An examination of the association between board selection, gender diversity and outcomes. Accounting and Finance,55(4), 1071–1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12082.
Jane Lenard, M., Yu, B., Anne York, E., & Wu, S. (2014). Impact of board gender diversity on firm risk. Managerial Finance,40(8), 787–803.
Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry,36(4), 620–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01740.x.
Jiraporn, P., Chatjuthamard, P., Tong, S., & Kim, Y. S. (2015). Does corporate governance influence corporate risk-taking? Evidence from the Institutional Shareholders Services (ISS). Finance Research Letters,13(May), 105–112.
Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a “critical mass?”. Journal of Business Ethics,118(1), 61–72.
John, K., Litov, L., & Yeung, B. (2008). Corporate governance and risk-taking. Journal of Finance,63(4), 1679–1728.
Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management,39(1), 232–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312463938.
Jones, T. M., & Gautschi, F. H. (1988). Will the ethics of business change? A survey of future executives. Journal of Business Ethics,7(4), 231–248.
Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics,37(2), 145–164.
Lazega, E. (2011). Pertinence et structure. Swiss Journal of Sociology,37(1), 127–149.
Li, K., Griffin, D., Yue, H., & Zhao, L. (2013). How does culture influence corporate risk-taking? Journal of Corporate Finance,23, 1–22.
Loukil, N., & Yousfi, O. (2016). Does gender diversity on corporate boards increase risk-taking? Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration,33(1), 66–81.
Majumdar, S. K. (1997). The impact of size and age on firm-level performance: Some evidence from India. Review of Industrial Organization,12(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007766324749.
Manita, R., Bruna, M. G., Dang, R., & Houanti, L. H. (2018). Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: Evidence from the USA. Journal of Applied Accounting Research,19(2), 206–224.
Martín-Ugedo, J. F., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2014). Firm performance and women on the board: Evidence from Spanish small and medium-sized enterprises. Feminist Economics,20(3), 136–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.895404.
Matsa, D. A., & Miller, A. R. (2013). A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,5(3), 136–169.
Miller, T., & del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies,46(5), 755–786.
Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review,21(2), 402–433. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1996.9605060217.
Mínguez-Vera, A., & Martin, A. (2011). Gender and management on Spanish SMEs: An empirical analysis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management,22(14), 2852–2873. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.599948.
Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry,32(4), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786541.
Nakano, M., & Nguyen, P. (2012). Board size and corporate risk taking: Further evidence from Japan. Corporate Governance: An International Review,20(4), 369–387.
Nelson, J. A. (2012). Are women really more risk-averse than men? GDAE working paper no. 12-05. Tufts University.
Nelson, J. A. (2016). Not-so-strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Feminist Economics,22(2), 114–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2015.1057609.
Perryman, A. A., Fernando, G. D., & Tripathy, A. (2016). Do gender differences persist? An examination of gender diversity on firm performance, risk, and executive compensation. Journal of Business Research,69(2), 579–586.
Peterson, R. A., Beltramini, R. F., & Kozmetsky, G. (1991). Concerns of college students regarding business ethics: A replication. Journal of Business Ethics,10(10), 733–738.
Roberts, R. W. (1992). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society,17(6), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-K.
Rowe, R., & Maughan, B. (2009). The role of risk-taking and errors in children’s liability to unintentional injury. Accident Analysis and Prevention,41(4), 670–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.03.004.
Sah, R. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1991). The quality of managers in centralized versus decentralized organizations. Quarterly Journal of Economics,106(1), 289–295.
Sarrasin, O., & Mayor, E. (2010). Cognitive appraisal and risk perception: What does really matter, biological sex or typical gender traits? Paper presented at the gender studies—Work in progress meeting. Bern: Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Geschlechterforschung, University of Bern.
Sila, V., Gonzalez, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity affect firm risk? Journal of Corporate Finance,36, 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.10.003.
Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal,26(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.10.002.
Subrahmanyam, V., Rangan, N., & Rosenstein, S. (1997). The role of outside directors in bank acquisitions. Financial Management,26(3), 23–36.
Switzer, L. N., & Huang, Y. (2007). How does human capital affect the performance of small and mid-cap mutual funds? Journal of Intellectual Capital,8(4), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930710830828.
Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics,102(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z.
Weimer, J., & Pape, J. C. (1999). A taxonomy of systems of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review,7(2), 152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00143.
Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics,126(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.02.005.
Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., & Netter, J. M. (2012). Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics,105(3), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005.
Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics,40(2), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5.
Zhang, H. (2009). Effect of derivative accounting rules on corporate risk-management behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics,47(3), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.11.007.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Bruna, M.G., Dang, R., Scotto, MJ. et al. Does board gender diversity affect firm risk-taking? Evidence from the French stock market. J Manag Gov 23, 915–938 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09473-1
- Women on corporate boards
- Gender diversity