Can board leadership contribute to board dynamic managerial capabilities? An empirical exploration among Norwegian firms

Abstract

This study explores how board leadership may influence the board dynamic managerial capabilities. We draw on the dynamic capabilities perspective to examine the effect of board chairs on the dynamic managerial capabilities of the board of directors. Using survey data from a sample of 410 Norwegian firms, our results reveal that board chair human capital is positively related to the board’s sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring capabilities. Moreover, we find the positive effects of board chair human capital on board sensing and seizing capabilities to be stronger under higher environmental dynamism. Our study suggests that board chairs can play an important leadership role in developing dynamic managerial capabilities at the board level, particularly in more dynamic environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Åberg, C., Kazemargi, N., & Bankewitz, M. (2017). Strategists on the board in a digital era. Business and Management Research,6(2), 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature,48(1), 58–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal,24, 1011–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Agarwal, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2009). Strategic renewal of organizations. Organization Science,20(2), 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (2008). Strategy as evolution with design: The foundations of dynamic capabilities and the role of managers in the economic system. Organization Studies,29(8–9), 1187–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barrales-Molina, V., Bustinza, Ó. F., & Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, L. J. (2013). Explaining the causes and effects of dynamic capabilities generation: A multiple-indicator multiple-cause modelling approach. British Journal of Management,24(4), 571–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beck, J. B., & Wiersema, M. F. (2013). Executive decision making: Linking dynamic managerial capabilities to the resource portfolio and strategic outcomes. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies,20(4), 408–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Becker, G. (1962). Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy,70(5), 9–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boivie, S., Bednar, M. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Andrus, J. L. (2016). Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring. Academy of Management Annals,10, 1–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Buchholtz, A. K., Ribbens, B. A., & Houle, I. T. (2003). The role of human capital in postacquisition CEO departure. Academy of Management Journal,46(4), 506–514.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Castanias, R. P., & Helfat, C. E. (1991). Managerial resources and rents. Journal of Management,17(1), 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Castanias, R. P., & Helfat, C. E. (2001). The managerial rents model: Theory and empirical analysis. Journal of Management,27, 661–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Drnevich, P. L., & Kriauciunas, A. P. (2011). Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance. Strategic Management Journal,32(3), 254–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal,21, 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics,26, 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly: 484–503.

  18. Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A. (2009). Strategic leadership: theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2003). Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better. Academy of Management Perspective,17(2), 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review,24(3), 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gabrielsson, J., Huse, M., & Minichilli, A. (2007). Understanding the leadership role of the board chairperson through a team production approach. International Journal of Leadership Studies,3(1), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Garg, S., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2016). Unpacking the CEO-board relationship: How strategy-making happens in entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, Forthcoming.

  23. Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likert-type scales. 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.

  24. Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Journal of Management,38(1), 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gulati, R., & Westphal, J. D. (1999). Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint venture. Administrative Science Quarterly,44, 473–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in organizational behavior.

  28. Hambrick, D. C., Werder, A. V., & Zajac, E. J. (2008). New directions in corporate governance research. Organization Science,19(3), 381–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. J. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal,31, 1145–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2014). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management,41(5), 1281–1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal,24(10), 997–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal,36(6), 831–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review,28(3), 383–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Huse, M. (1990). Board composition in small enterprises. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development,2(4), 363–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Huse, M. (2007). Boards, governance and value creation: The human side of corporate governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Huse, M. (2009). The value creating board: Corporate governance and organisational behavior. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management,39(1), 232–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kanadlı, S. B., Torchia, M., & Gabaldon, P. (2017). Increasing women’s contribution on board decision making: The importance of chairperson leadership efficacy and board openness. European Management Journal,36, 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Knockaert, M., Bjørnåli, E. S., & Erikson, T. (2015). Joining forces: Top management team and board chair characteristics as antecedents of board service involvement. Journal of Business Venturing,30(3), 420–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kor, Y. Y., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal,26(5), 489–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kor, Y. Y., & Mesko, A. (2013). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Configuration and orchestration of top executives’ capabilities and the firm’s dominant logic. Strategic Management Journal,34(2), 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kor, Y. Y., & Misangyi, V. F. (2008). Outside directors’ industry-specific experience and firms’ liability of newness. Strategic Management Journal,29(12), 1345–1355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kor, Y. Y., & Sundaramurthy, C. (2008). Experience-based human capital and social capital of outside directors. Journal of Management,35(4), 981–1006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Krause, R. (2017). Being the CEO’s boss: An examination of board chair orientations. Strategic Management Journal,38(3), 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Krause, R., Semadeni, M., & Withers, M. (2016). That special someone: When the board views its chair as a resource. Strategic Management Journal,37, 1990–2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Machold, S., & Farquhar, S. (2013). Board task evolution: A longitudinal field study in the UK. Corporate Governance: An International Review,21(2), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Machold, S., Huse, M., Minichilli, A., & Nordqvist, M. (2011). Board leadership and strategy involvement in small firms: A team production approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review,19(4), 368–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mahoney, J. T., & Kor, Y. Y. (2015). Advancing the human capital perspective on value creation by joining capabilities and governance approaches. Academy of Management Perspectives,29(3), 296–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal,13(5), 363–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. McNulty, T., & Pettigrew, A. (1999). Strategists on the board. Organization Studies,20(1), 47–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Minichilli, A., & Hansen, C. (2007). The board advisory tasks in small firms and the event of crises. Journal of Management and Governance,11(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2012). Board task performance: An exploration of micro- and macro-level determinants of board effectiveness. Journal of Organisational Behaviour,33(2), 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Minichilli, A., Zattoni, A., & Zona, F. (2009). Making boards effective: An empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management,20(1), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Peng, Y.-S., & Fang, C.-P. (2010). Acquisition experience, board characteristics, and acquisition behavior. Journal of Business Research,63(5), 502–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology,88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Management,12(4), 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Posner, M., & Petersen, S. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience,13, 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P.-J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review,17(3), 292–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Quigley, T. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2012). When the former ceo stays on as board chair: effects on successor discretion, strategic change, and performance. Strategic Management Journal,33(7), 834–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rasmussen, J. L., & Huse, M. (2011). Corporate governance in Norway: women and employee-elected board members. Handbook on international corporate governance: 121–146.

  62. Roberts, J., McNulty, T., & Stiles, P. (2005). Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management,16, S5–S26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rosenbloom, R. S. (2000). Leadership, capabilities, and technological change: The transformation of NCR in the electronic era. Strategic Management Journal,21, 1083–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly,32(2), 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Seierstad, C., & Opsahl, T. (2011). For the few not the many? The effects of affirmative action on presence, prominence, and social capital of women directors in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Management,27(1), 44–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sellevoll, T., Huse, M., & Hansen, C. (2007). The value creating board. Results from the “follow-up surveys” 2005/2006 in Norwegian firms. Oslo: Norwegian School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Shropshire, C. (2010). The role of the interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices. Academy of Management Review,35(2), 246–264.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Singh, V., & Vinnicombe, S. (2003). The 2002 female FTSE index and women directors. Women in Management Review,18(7), 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2009). Contingencies within dynamic managerial capabilities: interdependent effects of resource investment and deployment on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal,30(13), 1375–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review,32(1), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Sundaramurthy, C., Pukthuanthong, K., & Kor, Y. (2014). Positive and negative synergies between the CEO’s and the corporate board’s human and social capital: A study of biotechnology firms. Strategic Management Journal,35(6), 845–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal,28(13), 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal,18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Tian, J. J., Haleblian, J. J., & Rajagopalan, N. (2011). The effects of board human and social capital on investor reactions to new CEO selection. Strategic Management Journal,32(7), 731–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Morner, M. (2015). Board of directors’ diversity, creativity, and cognitive conflict. International Studies of Management and Organization,45(1), 6–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. van Ees, H., van der Laan, G., & Postma, T. J. B. M. (2008). Effective board behavior in the Netherlands. European Management Journal,26(2), 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews,9(1), 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,5(2), 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Withers, M. C., & Fitza, M. A. (2016). Do board chairs matter? The influence of board chairs on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, Early view in wiley online library.

  80. Withers, M. C., Hillman, A. J., & Cannella, A. A. (2012). A multidisciplinary review of the director selection literature. Journal of Management,38(1), 243–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Zahra, S., Neubaum, D., & Huse, M. (2000). Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: Exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management,26(5), 947–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Zahra, S., & Pearce, J. A. (1990). Determinants of board directors’ strategic involvement. European Management Journal,8(2), 164–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Zahra, S., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies,43(4), 917–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Zattoni, A., Gnan, L., & Huse, M. (2015). Does family involvement influence firm performance? Exploring the mediating effects of board processes and tasks. Journal of Management,41(4), 1214–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Zhang, P. (2010). Board information and strategic tasks performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review,18(5), 473–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Zhang, J. J., Baden-Fuller, C., & Pool, J. K. (2011). Resolving the tensions between monitoring, resourcing and strategizing: Structures and processes in high technology venture boards. Long Range Planning,44(2), 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Åberg.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Åberg, C., Shen, W. Can board leadership contribute to board dynamic managerial capabilities? An empirical exploration among Norwegian firms. J Manag Gov 24, 169–197 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-019-09460-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Board chair leadership
  • Human capital
  • Dynamic managerial capabilities
  • Survey method
  • Strategic leadership