Skip to main content
Log in

From governance to organizational effectiveness: the role of organizational identity and volunteers’ commitment

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study unpacks the relationship between non-profit organizations’ (NPOs) governance and organizational effectiveness by investigating the mediating role of volunteers’ organizational identity (OI) and their organizational commitment. While management scholars have traditionally focused on for-profit organizations to investigate the mechanisms underlying governance related issues, noteworthy insights may be derived from the analysis of NPOs due to the emerging societal importance of the Third Sector. Stakeholders are progressively requiring a better definition and implementation of NPOs’ governance, to ensure their effective and long-term sustainability at the service of the community. However, the extant literature has mainly focused on NPOs’ board mechanisms, thus neglecting the critical stakeholders that play a crucial role in the governance of these organizations, such as volunteers. Building on an “enlightened” stakeholder theory perspective, this study proposes and empirically tests a conceptual model that explains the linkages between NPOs’ governance effectiveness and organizational effectiveness. Specifically, volunteers’ OI and commitment to the NPO are hypothesized as the underlying mechanisms explaining such a relationship. Bootstrapped multi-mediation analysis was used on a sample of 300 respondents who volunteered in NPOs located in 10 Italian provinces. Results confirmed the role of OI and volunteers’ commitment as partially mediating variables on the relationship between NPOs’ governance effectiveness and organizational effectiveness. Both theoretical and practical implications for NPOs’ managers are provided, along with suggestions for future research by stressing the importance of the NPO governance phenomenon and the significant role played by volunteers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul Rashid, Z., Sambasivan, M., & Johari, J. (2003). The influence of corporate culture and organisational commitment on performance. Journal of Management Development, 22(8), 708–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. K. (2006). Nonprofit organizations: an introduction. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). IBM SPSS Amos 22 User’s Guide. Crawfordville: Amos Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arena, P. (2009). Patrick S. Renz, Project governance: Implementing corporate governance and business ethics in nonprofit organizations. Journal of Management and Governance, 13(4), 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagnoli, L., & Megali, C. (2011). Performance measuring in social enterprises. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, P., Murray, V., & Wolpin, J. (1992). Do nonprofit boards make a difference? An exploration of the relationships among board structure, process, and effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21(3), 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. A. (2002). Inclusive governance practices in nonprofit organizations and implications for practice. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(4), 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. A. (2005). Exploring the association between board and organizational performance in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(3), 317–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caers, R., Bois, C. D., Jegers, M., Gieter, S. D., Schepers, C., & Pepermans, R. (2006). Principal-agent relationships on the stewardship-agency axis. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 17(1), 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., & Ridge, R. (1992). Volunteers’ motivations: A functional strategy for the recruitment, placement, and retention of volunteers. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2(4), 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornforth, C. (2001). What makes boards effective? An examination of the relationships between board inputs, structures, processes and effectiveness in non-profit organisations. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(3), 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornforth, C. (2012). Nonprofit governance research: Limitations of the focus on boards and suggestions for new directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1117–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, C. A., Chalip, L., Green, B. C., & Simes, C. (2006). Reconsidering the role of training in event volunteers’ satisfaction. Sport Management Review, 9(2), 165–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuskelly, G., Taylor, T., Hoye, R., & Darcy, S. (2006). Volunteer management practices and volunteer retention: A human resource management approach. Sport Management Review, 9(2), 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (2004). Managing the non-profit organization: Practices and principles. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyl, E. A., Frant, H. L., & Stephenson, C. A. (2000). Governance and funds allocation in United States medical research charities. Financial Accountability and Management, 16(4), 335–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, H., & Gurr, T. R. (1975). Patterns of authority: A structural basis for political inquiry. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A., & Laville, J. L. (2004). The third sector in Europe. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangi, F., & Trotta, C. (2015). The ethical finance as a response to the financial crises: An empirical survey of European SRFs performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 19(2), 371–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, J. T., & Garner, L. T. (2011). Volunteering an opinion: Organizational voice and volunteer retention in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Volunteer Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 813–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden-Biddle, K., & Rao, H. (1997). Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organization Science, 8(6), 593–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6). New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. The Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1998). Nonprofit organizational effectiveness: Contrasts between especially effective and less effective organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9(1), 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2004). Doing things right: Effectiveness in local nonprofit organizations, a panel study. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 694–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2008). Advancing nonprofit organizational effectiveness research and theory: Nine theses. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(4), 399–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinna, A., & Monteduro, F. (2016). Boards, governance and value creation in grant-giving foundations. Journal of Management and Governance., 23, 50–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-016-9370-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoye, R., & Doherty, A. (2011). Nonprofit sport board performance: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Sport Management, 25(3), 272–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hustinx, L. (2005). Weakening organizational ties? A classification of styles of volunteering in the Flemish Red Cross. Social Service Review, 79(4), 624–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hustinx, L., Cnaan, R. A., & Handy, F. (2010). Navigating theories of volunteering: A hybrid map for a complex phenomenon. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40(4), 410–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jegers, M. (2009). Corporate governance in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(2), 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management, 7, 8–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S. (2001). Strategic performance measurement and management in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(3), 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreutzer, K., & Jäger, U. (2011). Volunteering versus managerialism: Conflict over organizational identity in voluntary associations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 634–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Miller, D. (1999). People matter: Commitment to employees, strategy and performance in Korean firms. Strategic Management Journal, 20(6), 579–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S., & Foss, N. J. (2011). Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal framing and governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 500–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liston-Heyes, C., & Liu, G. (2013). A study of non-profit organisations in cause-related marketing: Stakeholder concerns and safeguarding strategies. European Journal of Marketing, 47(11/12), 1954–1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, C. (2006). A framework for the governance of social enterprise. International Journal of Social Economics, 33(5/6), 376–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48(2), 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manetti, G., Bellucci, M., & Bagnoli, L. (2017). The management of the plague in Florence at the beginning of the Renaissance: The role of the partnership between the Republic and the Confraternita of Misericordia. Accounting History, 22(4), 510–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manetti, G., Bellucci, M., Como, E., & Bagnoli, L. (2015). Investing in volunteering: Measuring social returns of volunteer recruitment, training and management. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations., 26(5), 2104–2129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, C. (2010). Choosing sides: Contrasting attitudes to governance issues in Social Firms in the UK. Social Enterprise Journal, 6(1), 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClusky, J. E. (2002). Re-thinking nonprofit organization governance: Implications for management and leadership. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(4), 539–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mersland, R. (2011). The governance of non-profit micro finance institutions: Lessons from history. Journal of Management and Governance, 15(3), 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2007). Volunteers: A social profile. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, E. S., & Wyrick, C. R. (2011). Motivational bases for managing diversity: A model of leadership commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 368–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, S. (2007). The governance of open source initiatives: What does it mean to be community managed? Journal of Management and Governance, 11(2), 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrower, F., & Stone, M. M. (2006). Governance: Research trends, gaps, and future prospects. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. CT: Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parisi, C. (2013). The impact of organisational alignment on the effectiveness of firms’ sustainability strategic performance measurement systems: an empirical analysis. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(1), 71–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petkus, E., Jr. (2001). A customer value perspective in the nonprofit marketing context: Expanding the means-end chain for multiple stakeholders. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 8(3), 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, 36(4), 717–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogelberg, S., & Stanton, J. (2007). Understanding and dealing with organizational survey nonresponse. Organizational Research Methods, 10(2), 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: An organizational justice framework. Journal of organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1997). Defining the nonprofit sector: A cross-national analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, S. E. (2006). Optimization of volunteer labor assignments. Journal of Operations Management, 24(4), 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, A., & Shang, J. (2012). How we make donors feel: The relationship between premium benefit level and donor identity esteem. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 17(3), 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibel, W. (1990). Government/third-sector relationship in a comparative perspective: The cases of France and West Germany. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1(1), 42–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1994). Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(5), 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. H. (2004). Methodological challenges posed by measures of performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 8(4), 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. (2004). The rise of social cooperatives in Italy. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15(3), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (2001). Corporate Governance. Econometrica, 69(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tricker, R. B., & Tricker, R. I. (2015). Corporate governance: Principles, policies, and practices. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Puyvelde, S., Caers, R., Du Bois, C., & Jegers, M. (2012). The governance of nonprofit organizations: Integrating agency theory with stakeholder and stewardship theories. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(3), 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Puyvelde, S., Caers, R., Du Bois, C., & Jegers, M. (2016). Managerial objectives and the governance of public and non-profit organizations. Public Management Review, 18(2), 221–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, Z. G., Cable, D. M., & Voss, G. B. (2006). Organizational identity and firm performance: What happens when leaders disagree about “who we are?”. Organization Science, 17(6), 741–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellens, L., & Jegers, M. (2014). Effective governance in nonprofit organizations: A literature based multiple stakeholder approach. European Management Journal, 32(2), 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2012). Volunteerism research: A review essay. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(2), 176–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. R. (2001). Organizational identity in nonprofit organizations: Strategic and structural implications. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(2), 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, L., Ciappei, C., Faldetta, G., & Pellegrini, M. (2018a). Volunteers’ religiosity and intention to stay: The mediating role of motivation. Academy of Management Proceedings. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.10604abstract.

  • Zollo, L., Faldetta, G., Pellegrini, M. M., & Ciappei, C. (2016). Volunteers’ behavioral intention in non-profit organizations strategy: A structural equation model. In Academy of management proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.12995abstract.

  • Zollo, L., Faldetta, G., Pellegrini, M. M., & Ciappei, C. (2017a). Reciprocity and Gift-giving Logic in NPOs. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32(7), 513–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, L., Laudano, M. C., Ciappei, C., & Zampi, V. (2017b). Factors affecting universities’ ability to foster students’ entrepreneurial behaviour: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Development, 36(2), 268–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo, L., Yoon, S., Rialti, R., & Ciappei, C. (2018b). Ethical consumption and consumers’ decision making: The role of moral intuition. Management Decision, 56(3), 692–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristiano Ciappei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zollo, L., Laudano, M.C., Boccardi, A. et al. From governance to organizational effectiveness: the role of organizational identity and volunteers’ commitment. J Manag Gov 23, 111–137 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9439-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9439-3

Keywords

Navigation