Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Networks in policy, management and governance: a comparative literature review to stimulate future research avenues

  • Reviews and overviews
  • Published:
Journal of Management & Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Policy networks, network management and network governance have received particular attention in the public sector literature over the last 20 years. Networks have been studied from different perspectives resulting in the creation of various concepts and definitions. However, the proliferation of definitions, metrics and language is responsible for a confusing picture, where policy networks, network management and network governance are used both as synonyms and to define different concepts. We review the existing literature with two aims: firstly, to compare the three streams of literature, by highlighting their similarities and differences; secondly, to propose a guide for network scholars that identifies the importance of each stream in analyzing specific issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, S., & Kriesi, H. (2007). The network approach. Theories of the Policy Process, 2, 189–220.

  • Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (1998). Multinetwork management: Collaboration and the hollow state in local economic policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(1), 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M., (1999). Managing in network settings. Review of Policy Research, 16(1), 18–41.

  • Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Airaksinen, J., & Åström, J. (2009). Perceptions of power in regional networks: A nordic comparative analysis. Local Government Studies, 35(5), 595–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, K., & Stoker, G. (2012). Metagovernance and nuclear power in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(7), 1026–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, R. M. (2010). Taking stock of temporary organizational form: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 466–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, F. S., Brower, R. S., Choi, S. O., Goa, S. O., Jang, H., Kwon, M., & Word, J. (2004). Three traditions of network research: What the public management agenda can learn from other research communities. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 539–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertelli, A. M., & Smith, C. R. (2010). Relational contracting and network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), i21–i40.

  • Bevir, M., & Richards, D. (2009). Decentring policy networks: A theoretical agenda. Public Administration, 87(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, I., Lowndes, V., & Pratchett, L. (2011). Policy networks and governance network: Toward greater conceptual clarity. Political Studies, 9(3), 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A. (1998). Organizing Babylon: On the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration, 76(2), 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B. (2008). Assessing inter-organizational network for public service delivery: A process perceived effectiveness framework. Public Performance and Management Review, 31(3), 348–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M. (2001). Enterprising the state: The public management of welfare-to-work. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M., & Lewis, J. M. (2003). Bureaucracy, network or enterprise? Comparing models of governance in Australia, Britain, the Netherlands and New Zealand. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damgaard, B. (2006). Do policy networks lead to network governing? Public Administration, 84(3), 673–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deLeon, P., & Varda, D. M. (2009). Toward a theory of collaborative policy networks: Identifying structural tendencies. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage, R. W., & Mandell, M. P. (1990). Strategies for managing intergovernmental policies and networks. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, P. M., Graeme, C., & Finn, R. (2009). Leadership, service reform, and public-service networks: The case of cancer-genetics pilots in the english NHS. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 769–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2013). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society. doi:10.1177/0095399713481601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, A. D. (2011). Ideology, power, and structure of policy networks. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 361–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herranz, J, Jr. (2008). The multisector trilemma of network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isett, K. R., Mergel, I. A., LeRoux, K., Mischen, P. A., & Rethemeyer, R. K. (2011). Networks in public administration scholarship: Understanding where we are and where we need to go. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl 1), i157–i173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, R., & Brown, K. (2002). The government service delivery project: A case study of the push and pull of central government coordination. Public Management Review, 4(4), 439–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, R., & Brown, K. (2006). Adjusting the new ways of working: Experiments with service delivery in the public sector. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65(4), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, R., Mandell, M. P., & Agranoff, R. (2014). Network theory in the public sector: Building new theoretical frameworks. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, R., Mandell, M., & Brown, K. (2006). Mixing state, market and network governance modes: The role of government in crowded policy domains. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 9(1), 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast, R., Mandell, M. P., Brown, K., & Woolcock, G. (2004). Network structures: Working differently and changing expectation. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 363–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenis, P. (1991). Three preconditions for policy networks: some findings from a three-country study on industrial restructuring. Policy networks: Empirical evidence and theoretical considerations. 297–330.

  • Kenis, P., & Provan, K. G. (2009). Towards an exogenous theory of public network performance. Public Administration, 87(3), 440–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. J. M., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997). Public management and network management: An overview. In W. J. M. Kickert, E. H. Klijn, & J. F. M. Koppenjan (Eds.), Managing complex networks. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H. (1996). Analyzing and managing policy processes in complex networks. A theoretical examination of the concept policy network and its problems. Administration & Society, 28(1), 90–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H. (2001). Rules as institutional context for decision making in networks: The approach to post-war housing districts in two cities. Public Administration & Society, 33(2), 133–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H. (2005). Designing and managing networks: Possibilities and limitations for network management. European Political Science, 4:328–339.

  • Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1995). Managing networks in the public sector: A theoretical study of management strategies in policy networks. Public Administration, 73(3), 437–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000). Public management and policy networks: The foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management Review, 2(2), 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2006). Institutional design. Changing institutional features of networks. Public Management Review, 8(1), 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H., Steijn, B., & Edelenbos, J. (2010). The impact of network management on outcomes in governance networks. Public Administration, 88(4), 1063–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koliba, C., Zia, A., & Milis, R. M. (2011). Accountability in governance networks: An assessment of public, private and non-profit emergency management practices following Hurricane Katrina. Public Administration Review, 71(2), 210–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. M. (2011). The future of network governance research: Strength in diversity and synthesis. Public Administration, 89(4), 1221–1234.

  • Löfgren, K., & Ringholm, T. (2009). Introduction: New network modes of Nordic local government. Local Government Studies, 35(5), 505–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubell, M., & Fulton, A. (2008). Local policy networks and agricultural watershed management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 673–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, M. (1988). Intergovernmental management in interorganizational networks: A revised perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 11(4), 393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, M. P., & Keast, R. (2014). Managing strategically in collaborative networks: The importance of strategic leveraging. In P. Joyce, J. Bryson, & M. Holzer, (Eds.), Developments in strategic and public management. UK: Palgrave Millan Hampshire.

  • Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. W. A. (Eds.). (1992). Policy networks in British government. Oxford: GB, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M. (2002). Managing networks: Propositions on what managers do and why they do it. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 599–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M., & Agranoff, R. (2011). The limitation of public management networks. Public Administration, 89(2), 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menahem, G., & Stein, R. (2013). High-capacity and low-capacity governance networks in welfare service delivery: A typology and empirical examination of the case of Israeli municipalities. Public Administration, 91(1), 211–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, D., Meyer-Stamer, J., (2000), “Governance and networks. Tools to study the dynamics of clusters and global value chains”, Paper prepared for the IDS/INEF Project “The impact of global and local governance on industrial upgrading”, Duisburg, February 2000.

  • Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 359–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2003). Managing in the hollow state: Collaboration and contracting. Public Management Review, 5(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Seitz, G. (2012). Leadership in interorganizational networks: A literature review and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Review, 14, 428–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyholm, I., & Haveri, A. (2009). Between government and governance. Local solutions for reconciling representative government and network governance. Local Government Studies, 35(1), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L. J. (1997). Implementing public innovations in network settings. Administration and Society, 29(2), 115–138.

  • O’Toole, L. J, Jr, & Meier, K. J. (1999). Modeling the impact of public management: Implications of structural context. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(4), 505–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, L. J, Jr, & Meier, K. J. (2004). Public management in interorganizational networks: Matching structural networks and managerial networking. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(4), 469–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, Y. (2007). Problems of democratic accountability in network and multi-level governance. European Law Journal, 13(4), 469–486.

  • Park, H. H., Rethemeyer, R. K., & Hatmaker, D. M. (2009). The politics of connections: Assessing the determinants of social structure in policy networks (pp. 1–6). Meeting abstract supplement: Academy of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. H., & Rethemeyer, R. K. (2012). The politics of connections: Assessing the determinants of social structure in policy networks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus021.

  • Pope, J., & Lewis, J. (2008). Improving partnership governance: Using a network approach to evaluate partnerships in Victoria. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(4), 443–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., Beagles, J. E., Mercken, L., & Leischow, S. J. (2013). Awareness of evidence-based practices by organizations in a publicly funded smoking cessation network. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Lemaire, R. H. (2012). Core concepts and key ideas for understanding public sector organizational networks: Using research to inform scholarship and practice. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 638–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 414–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raab, J. (2002). Where do policy networks come from? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 581–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raab, J., Mannak, R.S. and Cambré, B., (2013), “Combining structure, governance and cultural context: A configurational approach to network effectiveness”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mut039, http://jpart.oxfordjournals.org.pros.lib.unimi.it/content/early/2013/08/23/jopart.mut039.full.pdf+html?sid=4f962d71-5f89-4ba3-91a8-ee2aa371ecc2.

  • Raab, J., & Milward, H. B. (2003). Dark networks as problems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 413–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rethemeyer, R. K., & Hatmaker, D. M. (2008). Network management reconsidered: An inquiry into management of network structures in public sector service provision. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 617–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, G., Bates, L., & Pattison, P. (2011). Network governance and environmental management: Conflict and cooperation. Public Administration, 89(1), 1293–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røiseland, A. (2011). Understanding local governance: Institutional forms of collaboration. Public Administration, 89(3), 879–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130.

  • Sandström, A., & Carlsson, L. (2008). The performance of policy networks: The relation between network structure and network performance. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 497–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian Political Science, 28(3), 195–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance network effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, M. (1998). The development of policy networks analysis: From modest origins to overarching frameworks. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(4), 389–416.

  • Torfing, J. (2005). Governance network theory: Toward a second generation. European Political Science, 4, 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turrini, A., Cristofoli, D., Frosini, F., & Nasi, G. (2010). Networking literature about determinants on network effectiveness. Public Administration, 88(2), 528–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vabo, S. I., & Røiseland, A. (2012). Conceptualizing the tools of government in urban network governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 35, 934–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bueren, E. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2003). Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kersbergen, K., & Van Waarden, F. (2004). ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research, 43, 143–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Warden, F. (1992). Dimensions and types of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 39, 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachhaus, A. (2009). Networks in contemporary public administration: A discourse analysis. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 31(1), 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, C. (2011). Network dymanics and network effectiveness: A methodological framework for public sector networks in the field of national security. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70(3), 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, K., Lowe, P., & Donaldson, A. (2010). Beyond policy networks: Policy framing and the policy of expertise in the 2001 foot and mouth disease crisis. Public Administration, 88(2), 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, H., De Jong, M., & Koppenjan, J. (2010). Applying policy network theory to policy-making in China: The case of urban health insurance reform. Public Administration, 88(2), 398–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy

    Martina Dal Molin & Cristina Masella

Authors
  1. Martina Dal Molin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cristina Masella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina Dal Molin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Molin, M.D., Masella, C. Networks in policy, management and governance: a comparative literature review to stimulate future research avenues. J Manag Gov 20, 823–849 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-015-9329-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-015-9329-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation