Advertisement

Journal of Management & Governance

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 45–67 | Cite as

What evolves in organizational co-evolution?

  • Dermot Breslin
Article

Abstract

Research in business and management has recently taken a co-evolutionary turn, driven both by the pace of environmental change, but also by the increasingly complex and interconnected nature of business environments. However few studies have drawn from the theoretical approaches used to study co-evolutionary processes in other scientific domains. In this paper recent advances in these other fields of study are examined with a view towards filling this gap, and providing a much needed theoretical underpinning to recent developments in co-evolutionary research. It is seen that the identification of the unit of evolution is a critical issue in this endeavor, with two broad approaches taken, namely the entity- and practice-based approach. In the former it is assumed that ideas, knowledge and capabilities are bound to individuals, groups and organizations with change over time being determined largely by external selection forces. In the practice-based view, the focus shifts to the process in which ideas, knowledge and capabilities are continually enacted and modified through actions. The paper further explores key theoretical and methodological issues relating to the development of both approaches, making a contribution not only to co-evolutionary research but to broader research in business and management.

Keywords

Evolution Co-evolution Routines Practice Innovation Learning Organizational change 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the editor, Dr Gianpaolo Abatecola, and three anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and feedback which has helped me develop this paper. I would further like to thank Prof Howard Aldrich, Dr James Baldwin, Prof Fiorenza Belussi, Prof Roberto Cafferata, Dr Stephen Dobson, Dr Denise Dollimore, Prof Pavel Pelikan and Prof Ilfryn Price for helpful comments and suggestions in the development of key ideas in this research.

References

  1. Abatecola, G. (2012). Interpreting corporate crises: Towards a co-evolutionary approach. Futures, 44(10), 860–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abatecola, G. (2014). Research in organizational evolution. What comes next? European Management Journal, 32(3), 434–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich, H. E. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Aldrich, H. E. (2001). Who wants to be an evolutionary theorist? Remarks on the occasion of the year 2000 OMT distinguished scholarly career award presentation. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10(2), 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aldrich, H. E., Hodgson, G. M., Hull, D. L., Knudsen, T., Mokyr, J., & Vanberg, V. J. (2008). In defence of generalized darwinism. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18, 577–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aldrich, H. E., & Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  8. Arthur, B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  9. Basalla, G. (1989). The evolution of technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baum, J. A. C., & Singh, J. (1994). Organizational hierarchies and evolutionary processes: Some reflections on a theory of organizational evolution. In J. A. C. Baum & J. Singh (Eds.), Evolutionary dynamics of organizations (pp. 3–22). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Becker, M. C. (2005). A framework for applying organizational routines in empirical research: Linking antecedents, characteristics and performance outcomes of recurrent interaction patterns. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 817–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blackmore, S. (1999). The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2011). The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 11, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. Breslin, D. (2008). A review of the evolutionary approach to the study of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(4), 399–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Breslin, D. (2011). Reviewing a generalized darwinist approach to studying socio-economic change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 218–235.Google Scholar
  17. Breslin, D. (2014). Calm in the storm: Simulating the management of organizational co-evolution. Futures, 52, 62–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Breslin, D., & Jones, C. (2012). The evolution of entrepreneurial learning. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 20(3), 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brittain, J. W., & Freeman, J. H. (1983). Organizational proliferation and density dependent selection. In J. Kimberely & R. Miles (Eds.), The organizational life cycle (pp. 291–338). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2, 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bruderer, E., & Singh, J. (1996). Organizational evolution, learning, and selection: A genetic-algorithm-based model. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1322–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Buenstorf, G. (2006). How useful is generalized Darwinism as a framework to study competition and industrial evolution? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16, 511–527.Google Scholar
  23. Burgelman, R. A. (1991). Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organization Science, 2, 239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Campbell, D. (1965). Variation, selection and retention in sociocultural evolution. In H. R. Barringer, G. I. Blanksten, & R. W. Mack (Eds.), Social change in developing areas: A reinterpretation of evolutionary theory (pp. 19–49). Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.Google Scholar
  25. Carley, K., & Hill, V. (2001). Structural change and learning within organizations. In A. Lomi & E. Larsen (Eds.), Dynamics of organizations (pp. 63–92). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Cloak, F. T. (1975). Is a cultural ethology possible? Human Ecology, 3, 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cordes, C. (2006). Darwinism in economics: From analogy to continuity. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16, 529–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Crossan, M., Maurer, C., & White, R. (2013). Multi-level mechanisms of organizational learning. International Conference on Organizational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities, April, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  29. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioural view of the firm (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284–295.Google Scholar
  31. Dantas, E., & Bell, M. (2011). The co-evolution of firm-centered knowledge networks and capabilities in late industrializing countries: The case of Petrobras in the offshore oil innovation system in Brazil. World Development, 39, 1570–1591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  35. Distin, K. (2011). Cultural evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Dobson, S., Breslin, D., Suckley, L., Barton, R., & Rodriguez, L. (2013). Small firm growth and innovation: An evolutionary approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation, 14(2), 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dollimore, D., & Gomes, E. (2014). The meaning of evolutionary language in the study of organizations: Lost in translation? WINIR Inaugural Conference, Greenwich, UK.Google Scholar
  38. Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 202–225.Google Scholar
  39. Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22, 1240–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Fleck, J. (2000). Artefact—activity: The coevolution of artefacts, knowledge and organization in technological innovation. In J. Ziman (Ed.), Technological innovation as an evolutionary process (pp. 248–266). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2004). The strategy field from the perspective of management science: Divergent strands and possible integration. Management Science, 50(10), 1309–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  46. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population of ecology of organization. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hodgson, G. (2003). The mystery of the routine: The Darwinian destiny of an evolutionary theory or economic change. Revue Economique, 54, 335–384.Google Scholar
  48. Hodgson, G. M., & Knudsen, T. (2004). The firm as an interactor: Firms as vehicles for habits and routines. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 281–307.Google Scholar
  49. Hodgson, G. M. (2008). The concept of a routine. In M. C. Becker (Ed.), Handbook of organizational routines (pp. 15–28). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  50. Hodgson, G. M., & Knudsen, T. (2010). Darwin’s conjecture: The search for general principles of social and economic evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hull, D. L. (1988). Science as a process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Jablonka, E. (2000). Lamarckian inheritance systems in biology: A source of metaphors and models in technological evolution. In J. Ziman (Ed.), Technological innovation as an evolutionary process (pp. 27–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Kim, D. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 35, 37–50.Google Scholar
  54. Koza, M. P., Tallman, S., & Ataay, A. (2011). The strategic assembly of global firms: A micro-structural analysis of local learning and global adaptation. Global Strategy Journal, 1, 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Langton, J. (1984). The ecological theory of bureaucracy: The case of Josiah wedgwood and the British pottery industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 330–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lant, T., & Mezias, S. (1992). An organizational learning model of convergence and reorientation. Organization Science, 3, 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Levitt, B., & March, J. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lewin, A. Y., & Volberda, H. W. (1999). Prolegomena on co-evolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10(5), 519–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lewin, A. Y., & Volberda, H. K. (2011). Co-evolution of global sourcing: The need to understand the underlying mechanisms of firm-decisions to offshore. International Business Review, 20, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lippmann, S., & Aldrich, H. E. (2014). History and evolutionary theory. In M. Bucheli, & R. D. Wadhwani (Eds.), Organizations in time: History, theory, markets (pp. 124–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Lomi, A., Larsen, E., & Wezel, F. (2010). Getting there: Exploring the role of expectations and preproduction delays in processes of organizational founding. Organization Science, 21, 132–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Madsen, T. L., Mosakowski, E., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Static and dynamic variation and firm outcomes. In J. A. C. Baum & B. McKelvey (Eds.), Variations in organization science, in honor of Donald T. Campbell (pp. 213–227). New York: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. March, J. (2001). Forward. In A. Lomi, & E. Larsen (Eds.), Dynamics of Organizations (p. i–xvii). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  65. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1975). The uncertainty of the past: Organizational learning under ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, 3, 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Martinez, M. A., Yang, T., & Aldrich, H. E. (2011). Entrepreneurship as an evolutionary process: Research progress and challenges. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 1(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McCarthy, I. P. (2005). Toward a phylogenetic reconstruction of organizational life. Journal of Bioeconomics, 7, 271–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McCarthy, I. P., Lawrence, T. B., Wixted, B., & Gordon, B. R. (2010). A multidimensional conceptualization of environmental velocity. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 604–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. McCarthy, I. P., Ridgway, K., Leseure, M., & Fieller, N. (2000). Organisational diversity, evolution and cladistic classifications. The International Journal of Management Science, 28, 77–95.Google Scholar
  70. McKelvey, B. (1982). Organizational systematics: Taxonomy, evolution, classification. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  71. Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  72. Mezias, S., & Glynn, M. A. (1993). The three faces of corporate renewal: Institution, revolution, and evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Miner, A. S. (1994). Seeking adaptive advantage: Evolutionary theory and managerial action. In J. A. C. Baum & B. McKelvey (Eds.), Evolutionary dynamics of organizations (pp. 76–89). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Mokyr, J. (2000). Evolutionary phenomena in technological change. In J. Ziman (Ed.), Technological innovation as an evolutionary process (pp. 52–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Murmann, J. P. (2003). Knowledge and competitive advantage: The co-evolution of firms, technology and national institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Murmann, J. P. (2013). The coevolution of industries and important features of their environments. Organization Science, 24, 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA.: Bellknap.Google Scholar
  78. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. O’Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Parmigiani, A., & Howard-Grenville, J. (2011). Routines revisited: Exploring the capabilities and practice perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 413–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pelikan, P. (2003). Bringing institutions into evolutionary economics: Another view with links to changes in physical and social technologies. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, 237–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 793–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2008). Issues in empirical filed studies of organizational routines. In M. C. Becker (Ed.), Handbook of organizational routines (pp. 281–300). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  85. Pentland, B. T., Feldman, M. S., Becker, M. C., & Liu, P. (2012). Dynamics of organizational routines: a generative model. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1484–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Pentland, B. T., Hærem, T., & Hillison, D. (2010). Comparing organizational routines as recurrent patterns of action. Organization Studies, 31, 917–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pentland, B., & Rueter, H. (1994). Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 484–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Plotkin, H. (1994). Darwin machines and the nature of knowledge. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Price, I. (2012). Organizational ecologies and declared realities. In K. Alexander & I. Price (Eds.), Managing organizational ecologies: Space, management and organizations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  90. Rerup, C., & Feldman, M. (2011). Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 577–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Reynolds, P. D., & White, S. B. (1997). The entrepreneurial process: Economic growth, men, women and minorities. Westport, CT: Quorum.Google Scholar
  92. Rodrigues, S., & Child, J. (2003). Co-evolution in an institutionalized environment. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 2137–2162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Salvato, C., & Rerup, C. (2011). Capabilities beyond collective entities: Multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities. Journal of Management, 37, 468–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27, 1863–1873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Schulz, M. (2002). Organizational learning. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to organizations (pp. 415–441). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  96. Szulanski, G. (2000). Appropriability and the challenge of scope: Banc one routinizes replication. In G. Dosi, R. R. Nelson, & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities (pp. 69–97). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Szulanski, G., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Getting it right the second time. Harvard Business Review, 80, 62–69.Google Scholar
  98. Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Tushman, M. L., & Romanelli, E. (1985). Organizational evolution: A metamorphosis model of convergence and reorientation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 171–222.Google Scholar
  100. Volberda, H., & Lewin, A. (2003). Guest editors’ introduction. Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co-evolution. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 2111–2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Warglien, M. (2002). Intraorganizational evolution. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to organizations (pp. 98–118). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  102. Weeks, J., & Galunic, C. (2003). A theory of the cultural evolution of the firm: The intra-organizational ecology of memes. Organization Studies, 24(8), 1309–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
  104. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  105. Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Winter, S. G. (2012). Capabilities: Their origins and ancestry. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 1402–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Witt, U. (2004). On the proper interpretation of “evolution” in economics and its implications for production theory. Journal of Economic Methodology, 11(2), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Witt, U. (2005). The evolutionary perspective on organizational change and the theory of the firm. In K. Dopfer (Ed.), The evolutionary foundations of economics (pp. 339–364). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Organisational Behavior GroupSheffield University Management SchoolSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations