Journal of Management & Governance

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 9–28 | Cite as

The collaborative push: moving beyond rhetoric and gaining evidence

  • Robyn Keast
  • Myrna Mandell


Collaboration has been enacted as a core strategy by both the government and nongovernment sectors to address many of the intractable issues confronting contemporary society. The cult of collaboration has become so pervasive that it is now an elastic term referring generally to any form of ‘working together’. The lack of specificity about collaboration and its practice means that it risks being reduced to mere rhetoric without sustained practice or action. Drawing on an extensive data set (qualitative, quantitative) of broadly collaborative endeavours gathered over 10 years in Queensland, Australia, this paper aims to fill out the black box of collaboration. Specifically it examines the drivers for collaboration, dominant structures and mechanisms adopted, what has worked and unintended consequences. In particular it investigates the skills and competencies required in an embedded collaborative endeavour within and across organisations. Social network analysis is applied to isolate the structural properties of collaborations over other forms of integration as well as highlighting key roles and tasks. Collaboration is found to be a distinctive form of working together, characterised by intense and interdependent relationships and exchanges, higher levels of cohesion (density) and requiring new ways of behaving, working, managing and leading. These elements are configured into a practice framework. Developing an empirical evidence base for collaboration structure, practice and strategy provides a useful foundation for theory extension. The paper concludes that for collaboration, to be successfully employed as a management strategy it must move beyond rhetoric and develop a coherent model for action.


Collaboration Networks Systems Competencies Practice framework 


  1. 6, P. (2004). Joined-up government in the Western World in comparative perspective: a preliminary literature review and exploration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), 103–138.Google Scholar
  2. ACTOSS. (2009). The path less travelled: Transport and social inclusion in Canberra. ACTOSS.
  3. Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Anklam, P. (2007). A practical guide to creating and sustaining networks at work and in the World. Burlington, MA, USA: Butterworth-Heinemann, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. Australian Public Service Commission. (2009). Delivering performance and accountability. Australian Government, AGPS: Canberra.
  6. Bracken, S. (2007). The importance of language, context and communication as components of successful partnerships. New Directions for Community Colleges, 139(Fall), 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, K., & Keast, R. (2003). Community-government engagement: Community connections through networked arrangements. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 25(1), 107–132.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, K., & Keast, R. (2005). Social services policy and delivery in Australia: Centre-periphery mixes. Policy & Politics, 33(3), 505–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chrislip, D., & Larson, C. (1994). Collaborative leadership: How civic leaders can make a difference. San Francisco: Joessy-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Ciger, B. (2001). Multi-organizational, multisector and multicommunity organizations: Setting the research agenda. In M. P. Mandell (Ed.), Getting results through collaboration: Networks and network structures for public policy and management (pp. 71–85). Westport, CA: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  11. Community Engagement Division. (2001). Directions statement: Community engagement. Brisbane: Department of Premier and Cabinet, Queensland Government.Google Scholar
  12. Denzin, N. (2006). Sociological methods: A sourcebook (5th Edn.). Aldine Transaction. ISBN 978-0-202-30840-1.Google Scholar
  13. Dunshire, A. (1978). Implementation in a bureaucracy. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
  14. Fine, M. (2001). The New South Wales demonstration projects in integrated community care. In M. Mandell (Ed.), Getting results through collaboration: Networks and network structures for public policy and management (pp. 207–219). Westport, CA: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  15. Foster-Fishman, P., Berkowitz, S. L., Lounsbury, D. W., Jacobson, S., & Allen, N. A. (2001). Building collaborative capacity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldsmith, S., & Eggers, W. (2004). Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  17. Government Service Delivery Project. (2000). Innovation and Service delivery frameworkdraft, unpublished document, Office of Public Service Commissioner, Queensland Government: Brisbane.Google Scholar
  18. Gray, B. (1989). Collaboration: Finding common ground for multi-party problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Head, B. (1999). The changing role of the public service: Improving service delivery. Canberrra bulletin of public administration, 94, 1–3.Google Scholar
  20. Himmelman, A. T. (2002). Collaboration for change: Definitions, decision-making models, roles and collaboration process guide. Minneapolis: Himmelman Consulting.Google Scholar
  21. Houge, T. (1994). Community based collaboration: Community wellness multiplied. Oregon State University: Center for Community Leadership.Google Scholar
  22. Huxham, C. (2003). Theorising collaboration practice. Public Management Review, 5(1), 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999). Consensus building as role playing and bricolage. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(1) (Winter), 9–26.Google Scholar
  24. Keast, R. (2004). Integrated human services: The role of networked arrangements, PhD Thesis, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  25. Keast, R. (2011). Joined up governance in Australia: How the past can inform the future. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(4), 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keast, R., & Brown, K. (2002). The government service delivery project: A case study of the push and pull of central government coordination. Public Management Review, 2(3), 1–17Google Scholar
  27. Keast, R., & Brown, K. (2006). Adjusting to new ways of working: Experiments in service delivery in the public sector. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65(4), 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keast, R., Brown, K., & Mandell, M. (2007a). Getting the right mix; unpacking integration meanings and strategies. International Public Management Journal, 10(1), 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keast, R., Brown, K., & McAulay, M. (2007). Child safey zonal partnership netrworks: Evaluation report, report prepared for Department of Child Safety, Queensland Government, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  30. Lauring, J. (2008). Rethinking social theory in international encounters: Language use as a negotiated object for identity making. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8(3), 343–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lawson, H. (2002). Improving conceptual clarity, accuracy and precision and facilitating more coherent institutional designs. In M. Brabeck & M. Walsh (Eds.), The contribution of interprofessional collaboration and comprehensive services to teaching and learning. The National Society for the Study of Education Year-Book, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ling, T. (2002). Delivering joined-up government in the UK: Dimensions, issues and problems. Public Administration, 80, 615–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Litterer, J. (1973). The analysis of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Lyons, M. (2001). Third sector: The contribution of non-profit and cooperative enterprises in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  35. Mandell, M. P. (1988). Intergovernmental management in interorganizational networks: A revised perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 11(4), 393–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mandell, M. P. (1994). Managing interdependencies through program structures: A revised paradigm. American Review of Public Administration, 24(1), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mandell, M. P. (Ed.). (2001). Getting results through collaboration: Networks and network structures for public policy and management. Westport, Ct: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  38. Mandell, M. P., & Keast, R. (2009). A new look at leadership in collaborative networks: Process catalysts. In J. A. Raffel, P. Leisnik & A. Middlebrooks (Eds.), Public sector leadership: International challenges and perspectives (pp.163–178). Edgar Elgar Press.Google Scholar
  39. McDonald, C., & Zetlin, D. (2004). The promotion and disruption of community service delivery systems’. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 39(3), 267–282.Google Scholar
  40. McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we do it. Public Administration Review, 66, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Melaville, A., & Blank, M. (1991). What it takes: Structuring interagency partnerships to connect children and families to comprehensive services. Washington, DC: Education and Human Services Consortium.Google Scholar
  42. Metcalfe, L. (1994). International policy coordination and public management reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 60, 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. (1998). Measuring network structure. Public Administration, 76(2), 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mulford, C., & Rogers, D. (1982). Defintions and models. In D. Rogers & A. Whetten (Eds.), Interorganizational coordination (pp. 9–13). Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  45. O’Connell, K. (2008). A qualitative evaluation of collaborative practice in the child protection sector in Queensland: Stories of change in the Department of Chid Safety’s Planning and Partnership Program, prepared for Peakcare Queensland Inc, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  46. O’Farrell, G. (2002). Public sector reform in Queensland. Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration, 104(June), 6–8.Google Scholar
  47. O’Flynn, J. (2009). The cult of collaboration in public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(1), 112–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ovretveit, L. (1993). Co-ordinating community care. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Podger, A. (2000) Australia’s balance between public and private arrangements’. Health Affairs, May–June 2000.Google Scholar
  50. Reddel, T. (2002). Beyond participation, hierarchies, management and markets: ‘New’ governance and place policies. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(1), 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ryan, P. (2003). I’m looking at the future: Evaluation of reconnect program—Final report, for Department of Family and Community Services, Canberra.
  52. Smyth, P. (2008). Collaborative governance: The community sector and collaborative network governance. In Collaborative governance: A new era of public policy in Australia?. Acton: ANU E Press.Google Scholar
  53. Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of ‘communities of practice’ in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Szirom, T., Lasater, Z., Hyde, J., & Moore, C. (2002). Working together: Integrated governance. Sydney: IPAA.Google Scholar
  55. Taylor, J. (2000). So how are they going to measure empowerment. In Paper for INTRAC 4th international workshop on the evaluation of social development, Oxford. April.Google Scholar
  56. Tierney, L. (1970). Social policy. In A. F. Davis & S. Encel (Eds.), Australian society (2nd ed., pp. 200–233). Melbourne: Cheshire Books.Google Scholar
  57. Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2006). Enacting leadership in collaborative advantage: Dilemmas of ideology and pragmatics in the activities of partnership managers. British Journal of Management, 14, 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walsh, P. (1993). Welfare policy. In B. Stevens & J. Wanna (Eds.), Goss government: Promise and performance of labor Queensland (pp. 215–225). South Yarra, Melbourne: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  59. Winer, M., & Ray, K. (1994). Collaboration hand-book: Creating, sustaining and enjoying the journey. St Paul, MA: Amhert H Wilder Foundation.Google Scholar
  60. Woolcock, G., & Boorman, K. (2003). Goodna service integration project: Doing what we know we should, Final Report, The Community Service Research Centre and University of Queensland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SCU Business SchoolCoolangattaAustralia
  2. 2.Professor EmeritusCalifornia State University, NorthridgeHuntington BeachUSA
  3. 3.Southern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations