Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Remote control: measuring performance for value creation and governance of globally distributed knowledge work

  • Published:
Journal of Management & Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the governance of globally distributed knowledge work. To measure performance in knowledge work, it is important to focus on what the knowledge workers do and hence view knowledge as something one does, namely the practices, instead of something one has. By following the practices of knowledge work, it was possible to evaluate the effect of measures related to organizational processes, and identify what was not well covered by the measurement tool. Strategic and long term needs such as learning and employee competence are better managed through projects. This article shows how work performance in international organizations needs two different measures: one tool for measuring short-term value creation linked to the organizational processes; and, one tool for measuring long-term value creation linked to the practices of service work made in projects. Global governance of distributed employees is therefore successfully managed through key performance measures and through understanding projects through their multiple contributions, at both an individual and an organizational level. Global long term governance needs are strategic for the entire firm. The paper rests on an in-depth empirical case study of an international professional service firm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field. International Journal of Technology Management, 18(5), 433–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarthy, B., & White, R. (2002). Strategy process: Forming, implementing and changing strategies. In A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of strategy and management. UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaminade, C., & Roberts, H. (2003). What it means is what it does: A comparative analysis of implementing intellectual capital in Norway and Spain. European Accounting Review, 12(4), 733–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charreire Petit, S., & Huault, I. (2008). From practice-based knowledge to the practice of research: Revisiting constructivist research works on knowledge. Management Learning, 39(1), 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choo, C. W., & Bontis, N. (2002). The strategic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corno, F., Reinmoeller, P., & Nonaka, I. (1999). Knowledge creation within industrial systems. Journal of Management and Governance, 3(4), 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DATI. (2001). A guideline for intellectual capital statements. Copenhagen: Danish Agency for Trade and Industry (DATI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital. Realizing your company′s true value by findings its hidden brainpower. New York: Harper Collins Publisher, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferriani, S., Corrado, R., & Boschetti, C. (2005). Organizational learning under organizational impermanence: Collaborative ties in film project firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 9(3/4), 257–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. (2006). Knowledge and organization in the theory of the multinational corporation: Some foundational issues. Journal of Management and Governance, 10(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosse, R. (2000). Knowledge creation and transfer in global service firms. In Y. Aharoni & L. Nachum (Eds.), The globalisation of services: Some implications for theory and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P. (2005). Strategy as practice: An activity based approach. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Langley, A. L. M., & Whittington, R. (2007). Strategy as practice: Research directions and resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2003). Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity-based view. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (2005). How are global markets global? The architecture of a flow world. In K. Knorr Cetina & A. Preda (Eds.), The sociology of financial markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, measurement and reporting. New York: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112. Winter Special Issue: Organizations, Decision Making and Strategy.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindkvist, L. (2004). Governing project-based firms: Promoting market-like processes within hierarchies. Journal of Management and Governance, 8(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, C. H., & Yip, G. S. (1996). Developing global strategies for service businesses. California Management Review, 38(2), 64–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Løwendahl, B. R. (1997). Strategic management of professional service firms. Copenhagen: Handelshøjskolens forlag.

  • Maister, D. H. (1993). Managing the professional service firm. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MERITUM. (2002). Guidelines for managing and reporting on intangibles. Madrid: Fundacion Airtel Movil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D., & Yanow, D. (2009). Re-turn to practice: An introductory essay. Organization Studies, 30(12), 1309–1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oakes: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • NFF. (2002). Anbefalte retningslinjer for tilleggsinformasjon om verdiskapning. Oslo: Norske Finansanalytikeres Forening (The Norwegian Society For Financial Analysts).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D. (2007). Stretching out and expanding work practices in time and space: The case of telemedicine. Human Relations, 60(6), 889–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R. (2001). Reframing business. When the map changes the landscape. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2003). Measuring knowledge management in the business sector: First steps: OECD.

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2006). Socio material practices: Enacting organisational realities in the workplace. Paper presented at the The second organization studies summer workshop: Re-turn to practice: Understanding organization as it happens, Mykonos.

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). Practice in research: Phenomenon, perspective and philosophy. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 23–33). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, I. R. (2000). The knowing-doing gap, how smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston: HBS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasche, A., & Robert, C. (2009). Researching strategy practices: A genealogical social theory perspective. Organization Studies, 30(7), 713–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2002). Towards a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, H., & Breunig, K. J. (2004). Communicating intellectual capital: Putting your mouth where your resources are. Helsinki: IC Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, H., Simic-Brønn, P., & Breunig, K. J. (2003). Intangible assets and communication. San Fransisco: IABC Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, C. (1996). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner–researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, G., & Roos, J. (1997). Measuring your company’s intellectual performance. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarbrough, H., Swan, J., Laurent, S., Bresnen, M., Edelman, L., & Newell, S. (2004). Project-based learning and the role of learning boundaries. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1579–1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1863–1873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K. D., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal-Horn, S., & Dean, A. (2007). The globalization of law firms: Managerial issues. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18(2), 206–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal-Horn, S., & Dean, A. (2009). Delivering ‘effortless experience’ across borders: Managing internal consistency in professional service firms. Journal of World Business, 44(1), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skjølsvik, T., Løwendahl, B. R., Kvålshaugen, R., & Fosstenløkken, S. M. (2007). Choosing to learn and learning to choose: Strategies for client co-production and knowledge development. California Management Review, 49(3), 110–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. (1992). Learning by knowledge intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 713–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. (2004). Methodological challenges posed by measures of performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 8(4), 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing and measuring knowledge-based assets. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, R. (2008). Introduction: Constructionist approaches to management research. Management Learning, 39(2), 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R. (2007). Strategy practice and strategy process: Family differences and the sociological eye. Organization Studies, 28(October 1), 1575-1586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Joachim Breunig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breunig, K.J., Hydle, K.M. Remote control: measuring performance for value creation and governance of globally distributed knowledge work. J Manag Gov 17, 559–582 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9194-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9194-1

Keywords

Navigation