Skip to main content
Log in

The role, power and influence of company chairs

  • Published:
Journal of Management & Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops an analytical framework to depict the heterogeneity that characterises the role of board chair and demonstrate the potential variability in how chairs operate boards and exercise power and influence on strategy, control and resource related tasks at board level. Theories of power and influence, as applied to top management teams and boards of directors, are explicated within the context of contemporary governance practices that are establishing the role of the board chair as distinct to that of the chief executive officer. Specifically, the paper maps sources of power and varying contemporary chair practices, including chair nomenclature (i.e. executive vs. non-executive chairs), chair origin (insider vs. outsider) and chair time (full-time vs. part-time). A number of theoretical chair-power models emerge from this analysis and are subject to empirical analysis using data collected from 160 chairs of 500 FTSE-listed companies. Theoretically and empirically, the paper complements structural approaches to studying boards with attention to behaviour on boards. By linking board structure, board process and the exercise of influence, the study reveals both differences amongst chairs in how they run the board, but also that chairs’ differ in the influence they exert on board-related tasks. Full-time executive chairs exert their greatest influence in strategy and resource dependence tasks whereas part-time, non-executive chairs seem to exert more influence over monitoring and control tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. G. (1993). Potential power and power use: An investigation of structure and behaviour. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 441–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadbury, A. (1992). The financial aspects of corporate governance, report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance. London: Gee & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, S., Harrison, J. S., & Bergh, D. D. (2003). Failed takeover attempts, corporate governance and refocusing. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1972). Organization structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conyon, M. J. (1994). Corporate governance changes in UK companies between 1998 and 1993. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2(2), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (1997). Separate but not independent: Board leadership structure in large corporations. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5(3), 126–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Reporting Council. (2003). Combined code on corporate governance. London: Department of Trade and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Reporting Council. (2006). Combined code on corporate governance. London: Department of Trade and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Reporting Council. (2008). Combined code on corporate governance. London: Department of Trade and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 505–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., & D’Aveni, R. A. (1994). CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1079–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. (1996). Strategic leadership. MN: West: St Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2009). Strategic leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2003). Not the usual suspects: How to use board process to make boards better. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24, 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsson, J., Huse, M., & Minichilli, A. (2007). Understanding the leadership role of the board chairperson through a team production approach. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(1), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huse, M. (2007). Boards, governance and value creation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Board of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc, R. (2005). Assessing board leadership. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(5), 654–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorsch, J. W., & MacIver, E. (1989). Pawns and potentates: The reality of America’s corporate boards. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, M. L. (1971). Directors: Myth and reality. Boston, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, T., & Pettigrew, A. M. (1996). The contribution, power and influence of part-time board members. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 4(2), 160–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, T., & Pettigrew, A. M. (1999). Strategists on the board. Organization Studies, 20, 47–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G., & Kirchmaier, T. (2008). The changing role of the chairman: Impact of corporate governance reform in the United Kingdom, 1995–2005. European Business Organization Law Review, 9, 187–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1991). The relative power of CEOs and boards of directors: Associations with corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M. (1973). The politics of organizational decision-making. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M., & McNulty, T. (1995). Power and influence in and around the boardroom. Human Relations, 48, 845–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2002). Building the complementary board: The work of the Plc chairman. Long Range Planning, 35, 493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J., McNulty, T., & Stiles, P. (2005). Beyond agency conceptions of the work of the non-executive director: Creating accountability in the boardroom. British Journal of Management, 16, S5–S26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J., & Stiles, P. (1999). The relationship between chairmen and chief executives: Competitive or complementary roles? Long Range Planning, 32(1), 36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, W., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2002). Power dynamics with top management and their impacts on CEO dismissal followed by inside succession. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1195–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udueni, H. (1999). Power dimensions in the board and outside director independence: Evidence from large industrial UK Firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7(1), 62–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry McNulty.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 6.

Table 6 The influence of the chair: perceptions from Chairs and CEO in 59 companies where both responded

Appendix 2

See Table 7.

Table 7 Characteristics of the five chair models in practice

Appendix 3

See Table 8.

Table 8 Chair influence on strategy tasks

Appendix 4

See Table 9.

Table 9 Chair influence on control tasks

Appendix 5

See Table 10.

Table 10 Chair influence on resource dependence tasks

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McNulty, T., Pettigrew, A., Jobome, G. et al. The role, power and influence of company chairs. J Manag Gov 15, 91–121 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-009-9119-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-009-9119-4

Keywords

Navigation