Skip to main content

Board Activities and the Denationalization of Ownership – The Case of Sweden

Abstract

This article investigates the effects of a denationalization of ownership on the activities of corporate boards. A simultaneous change in investors' identity on the Swedish stock exchange and the board activities of large Swedish firms was observed during the late 90s. Drawing on the heritage hypothesis we conjectured that there could be a relationship between increased international ownership and increased board activities on firm level. The results show that board activities in terms of range of activities and engagement in the decision process increased during the 90s. No relationship was found between change in ownership identity and board activities, instead the increase in activities seemed to be a general phenomenon, while ownership change was firm specific. To explain this result a hypothesis of legitimization seeking behaviour and indirect influence of denationalization, specific to the period in question, is formulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Agnblad, J., E. Berglöf, P. Högfeldt and H. Svancar: 2001, “Ownership and Control in Sweden: Strong Owners, Weak Minorities, and Social Control”. in F. Barca and M. Beht, (eds.), The Control of Corporate Europe, Oxford.

  2. Alchain, A.A. and H. Demsetz: 1972, “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization”. American Economic Review 62: 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berglöf, E.: 1994, “Ownership of Equity and Corporate Governance – The Case of Sweden”. In T. Baums, M.R. Buxbaum and K.J. Hopt (eds.), Institutional Investors and Corporate Governance. (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin). pp. 311–328.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bjerke, B.: 1998, Affärsledarskap i fem olika kulturer, Lund: Studentlitteratur (Mangement in five different cultures).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charkham, J.P.: 1994. “Keeping Good Company, A study of corporate governance in five countries” (Clarendon Press: Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cochran, P.L. and S. Wartick: 1988, “Corporate Governance, A Review of the Literature” (Morristown: Financial Executive Research Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collin, S.-O.:1990, Aktiebolagets kontroll. Ett transaktionskostnadsteoretisk inlägg i debatten om ägande och kontroll av aktiebolag och storföretag. Lund Studies in Economic and Management, 9. Lund: Lund University Press. (The control of the public limited company. A contribution to the debate about ownership and control from the perspective of transaction cost). (Only available in Swedish)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Collin, S.-O: 1998, “Why are these islands of conscious power found in the ocean of ownership? Institutional and Governance hypotheses explaining the existence of Business Groups in Sweden.” Journal of Management Studies 35(6): 719–746.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Denis, D.J. and A. Sarin:1999, “Ownership and board structures in publicly traded corporations”. Journal of Financial Economics 52: 187–223.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fama, E.F.: 1980, “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy 88: 288–307.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fama, E.F. and M. Jensen:1983, “Separation of Ownership and Control”. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301–325.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gedajlovic, E.R. and D.M. Shapiro: 1998“Management and Ownership Effects: Evidence from Five Countries”. Strategic Management Journal 19: 533–553.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glete, J.: 1994, Ägande och industriell omvandling. Stockholm: SNS Förlag. (Ownership and Industrial transformation)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guillén, M.F.: 1999, Corporate Governance and Globalizatin: Arguments and Evidence against Convergence (Working paper, Wharton business School).

  15. Gustavsen, B.: 1972, Industristyret (Oslo: Tanum Forlag).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hilmer, F.G. and R.I. Tricker: 1990, An effective board. From the company director manual. (Sidney: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Isaksson, M. and R. Skog: 1994, “Corporate Governance in Swedish Listed Companies”. In T. Baums, R.M. Buxbaum and K.J. Hopt (eds.), Institutional investors and corporate governance. (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter). pp. 287–310.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson, J.L., C.M. Daily and A.E. Ellstrand: 1996, “Board of Directors: A Review and Research Agenda”. Journal of Management 22: 409–438.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Judge, Jr. W. Q. and C.P. Zeithaml: 1992, “Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process”. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4): 706–794.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kärreman, M.: 1999, “Styrelseledamöters mandat – ansats till en teori om styrelsearbete i börsnoterade företag”. Lund Studies in Economics and Management 54, (Institute of Economic Research, Lund University, Lund). (The mandat of the directors on the board, an approach to a theory about board activities in listed companies).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lorsch, J.: 1995, “Empowering the Board”. Harvard Business Review Jan-Feb 107–117.

  22. Lorsch, J. and E. MacIver: 1989, Pawns and Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards (Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lundgren, A.: 1986, Handling och strukturer – en organisationsteoretisk studie av styrelsearbetets villkor i stora företag. Stockholm: EFI. (Action and structure – an organizational study of conditions for board work in large companies.).

    Google Scholar 

  24. McNulty, T. and A. Pettigrew: 1999, “Strategists on the Board”. Organizational Studies 20(1)47–74.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meyer, J.W., J. Boli, G.M. Thomas and F.O. Ramirez: 1997, “World Society and the Nation State”, The American Journal of Sociology 103: 144–182.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moerland, P.: 1995, “Corporate Ownership and Control Structures: An International Comparison”. Review of Industrial Organization, 10: 443–464.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Morck, R.A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny: 1988, “Management Ownership and Market Evaluation; an Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Financial Economic 20: 293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oxelheim, L.: 1996, Financial Markets in Transition – Globalization, Investment and Economic Growth (International Thomson Business Press; London).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pettigrew, A. and T. McNulty: 1996, Control and Creativity in the Boardroom. Paper presented to the Columbia Business School Conference on Senior Leadership and Corporate Transformation, Arden House, Columbia University.

  30. Porter, M.E.: 1992, “Capital Disadvantage: America's Failing Capital Investment system”. Harvard Business Review, Sept – Oct, 65–82.

  31. Porter, M.E.: 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations (Free Press: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Randoy, T. and L. Oxelheim: 2001, The Impact of Foreign Board membership on Firm Value, the Rewards of Anglo-American Corporate Governance,Institute of Economic Research working paper serie 2001:1, Lund.

  33. Roe, M.: 1993. “Some Differences in Corporate Structure in Germany, Japan and the United States; Columbian Cartel Launches Bid for Japanese Firms; A Cautionalry Note on Drasing Lessons from comparative Corporate Law”.Yale Law Journal 102:1927–1937.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Styles, P. and B., Taylor: 1996, “The Strategic Role of the board”. Corporate Governance, An International Review, 4(1): 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sundqvist, S.-I. and A. Sundin: 1994, Styrelser och revisorer i Sveriges börsföretag. (Stockholm: Dagens Nyheter.) (Owners and Power in Swedish listed companies).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sundqvist, S.-I. and A. Sundin: 1999, Styrelser och revisorer i Sveriges börsföretag. (Stockholm: Dagens Nyheter). (Owners and Power in Swedish listed companies).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tashakori, A. and W. Boulton: 1983, “A look at the Board's Role in Planning”. The Journal of Business Strategy 3(3): 64–70.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tricker, B.: 1994, International Corporate Governance. (London: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Walsh, J.P. and J.K. Seward, 1990. 'On the Efficiency of Internal and External Corporate Control Mechanisms”. Academy of Management Review 15: 421–458.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Whitley, R.: 1994. “The Internationalisation of Firms and Markets: Its Significance and Institutional Structuring”. Organization 1: 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Williamson, O.E.: 1983. Organization form, Residual Claimants, and Corporate Control”. Journal of Law and Economics (26), 351–366.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Williamson, O.E.: 1996, Mechanisms of governance. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yermack, D.: 1996. Higher Market Values of Companies with a Small Board of Directors”. Journal of Financial Economics 40:185–211.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zahra, S.A.: 1990, “Increasing the Board's Involvement in Strategy”, Long Range Planning 23,6, 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zahra, S.A. and J.A. Pearce: 1989,“Board of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance. A Review and Integrative Model”, Journal of Management 15: 291–334.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

JONNERGÅRD, K., KÄRREMAN, M. Board Activities and the Denationalization of Ownership – The Case of Sweden. Journal of Management & Governance 8, 229–254 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-004-1108-z

Download citation

  • board of directors
  • denationalization of ownership
  • patterns of activities