Abstract
Background
In Spain, allowing women to be accompanied by their partners during cesarean deliveries is a poorly consolidated practice. Going through this experience alone, not only deprives women from the opportunity of sharing the birth with their partners, but also, forces them to face, on their own, one of the most stressful experiences during pregnancy.
Objective
To analyze whether significant differences exist in levels of anxiety of women who receive an elective cesarean delivery, according to whether they are allowed to be accompanied by their partners.
Design
Quasi-experimental, longitudinal, prospective study, comparing a group of 31 women receiving elective cesarean deliveries, without the presence of their partners, with a group of 33 women with elective cesarean deliveries who were accompanied by their partners. Anxiety levels were assessed using the STAI-State/Trait scale. Participants were given a questionnaire to assess their level of satisfaction with the care received.
Results
Anxiety measured via total scores on the STAI-S scale was significantly lower (p < 0.004) among the women who were accompanied by their partners during the elective cesarean delivery (median = 25), compared to the group who were not (median = 50). The differences were also significant (p < 0.003) considering the impact of accompaniment upon the group with high scores in the STAI-S (> 31) and continue to be significant when using the cut-off point of very high scores on the STAI-S (> 45).
Conclusions
Presence of partners during elective cesareans is a key factor for decreasing the anxiety caused by the surgery and for improving the overall experience of cesarean deliveries.
Significance
What is already known on this subject? Cesarean deliveries are one of the most stressful life experiences. Allowing women to be accompanied by their partners during cesarean deliveries is a poorly consolidated practice in some countries. Otherwise relevant international institutions recommend allowing an accompanying adult, present with the mother in the operating room during the entire process.
What this study adds? Presence of partners during elective cesareans is a key factor for decreasing deliveries’ anxiety, improving the overall experience, but it needs a mentality change in the obstetric and surgical team. These results could change the services organization in a more humane delivery, with overall positive impact in the patients’ care.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Adeniran, A., Adesina, K., Aboyeji, A., Balogun, O., Adeniran, P., & Fawole, A. (2017). Attitude and practice of birth attendants regarding the presence of male partner at delivery in Nigeria. Ethiopean Journal of Health Sciences, 27, 107–114.
Badajoz Valer, M. V., PellicerAlgora, M. R., Llorente López, S., Ballesteros Soria, M., Cabrejas De Francisco, J., Rubio Blasco, E., & Aparicio Borjabad, M. (2014). Pre-surgical anxiety level of the patient undergoing programmed surgery. Revista De La Asociación Española De Enfermería Quirúrgica, 36, 10–13 (In Spanish).
Bielinski-Blattmann, D., Gürber, S., Lavallee, K., Grob, A., Surbek, D., & Stadlmayr, W. (2016). Labour experience and postpartum stress and depression: A quantitative and qualitative examination. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 34, 162–174.
Blüml, V., Stammler-Safar, M., Reitinger, A. K., Resch, I., Naderer, A., & Leithner, K. (2012). A qualitative approach to examine women’s experience of planned cesarean. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 41, E82-90.
Clement, S. (2001). Psychological aspects of caesarean section. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 15, 109–126.
Clout, D., & Brown, R. (2015). Sociodemographic, pregnancy, obstetric, and postnatal predictors of postpartum stress, anxiety and depression in new mothers. Journal of Affective Disorders, 188, 60–67.
Cunningham, G. F. (2015). Williams Obstetricia. McGraw-Hill.
Eccles, M., Grimshaw, J., Campbell, M., & Ramsay, C. (2003). Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 12, 47–52.
Faas-Fehervary, P., Schwarz, K., Bauer, L., & Melchert, F. (2005). Caesarian section on demand: Influence of personal birth experience and working environment on attitude of German gynecologist. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 122, 162–166.
Gómez Sánchez, F., Criado Enciso, l., & Castro Vilar, S. (2011). Niveles de depresión y ansiedad en las gestantes que acuden a urgencias [Levels of depression and anxiety in pregnant women who attend the emergency room]. In Comunicaciones al Congreso Nacional de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Sevilla 2011. SEGO (in Spanish).
Gorkem, U., Togrul, C., Sahiner, Y., Yazla, E., & Gungor, T. (2016). Preoperative anxiety may increase post-cesarean delivery pain and analgesic consumption. Minerva Anestesiologica, 82, 974–980.
Gungor, I., & Kizilkaya, N. (2012). Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and caesarean birth. Midwifery, 28, 348–357.
Gutman, Y., & Tabak, T. (2011). the intention of delivery room staff to encourage the presence of husbands/partners at Cesarean sections. Nursing Research and Practice, 2011, 192649.
Haugen, A. S., Eide, G. E., Olsen, M. V., Haukeland, B., Remme, A. R., & Wahl, A. K. (2009). Anxiety in the operating theatre: A study of frequency and environmental impact in patients having local, plexus or regional anaesthesia. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18, 2301–2310.
Hepp, P., Hagenbeck, C., Burghardt, B., Jaeger, B., Wolf, O. T., Fehm, T., & Schaal, N. (2016). Measuring the course of anxiety in women giving birth by caesarean section: A prospective study. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth, 16, 113.
Hildingsson, I. (2008). How much influence do women in Sweden have on caesarean section? A follow-up study of women’s preferences in early pregnancy. Midwifery, 24, 46–54.
Hobson, J. A., Slade, P., Wrench, I., & Power, L. (2006). Preoperative anxiety and postoperative satisfaction in women undergoing elective caesarean section. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 15, 18–23.
Hugill, K., Kemp, I., & Kindon, C. (2015). Fathers’ presence at caesarean section with general anaesthetic: Evidence and debate. The Practising Midwife, 18, 19–22.
Johansson, M., Hildingsson, I., & Fenwick, J. (2013). Important factors working to mediate Swedish fathers’ experiences of a caesarean section. Midwifery, 29, 1041–1049.
Kadour-Peero, E., Miller, N., Vitner, D., Bleicher, I., Said, S., Dashkovsky, M., Levy, E., Sagi, S., & Gonen, R. (2019). Who may accompany the parturient to the delivery room? Archives of Gynecology and Obstretics, 300, 293–297.
Karlström, A., Rådestad, I., Eriksson, C., Rubertsson, C., Nystedt, A., & Hildingsson, I. (2010). Cesarean section without medical reason, 1997 to 2006: A Swedish register study. Birth, 37, 11–20.
Keogh, E., Hughes, S., Ellery, D., Daniel, C., & Holdcroft, A. (2005). Psychosocial influences on women’s experience of planned Cesarean section. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68, 167–174.
Kondou, A., & Haku, M. (2018). The experiences of husbands present at their wives’ emergency cesarean sections. Journal of Medical Investigation, 65, 268–273.
Matinnia, N., Haghighi, M., Jahangard, L., Ibrahim, F. B., Rahman, H. A., Ghaleiha, A., Holsboer-Trachsler, E., & Brand, S. (2018). Further evidence of psychological factors underlying choice of elective cesarean delivery (ECD) by primigravidae. Revista Brasileira De Psiquiatria, 40, 83–88.
Maziero, C. P., Zani, A. V., Bernardy, C. C. F., Pontes, G. M., Lago, M. T. G., & Pinto, K. R. T. F. (2020). A não presença do acompanhante no parto: Visão dos profissionais da saúde [The non-presence of the parent assistant: Vision of health professionals]. Revista Fundamental Care Online, 12, 531–536 (in Portuguese).
MSPS - Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social (2009). Maternidad hospitalaria. Estándares y recomendaciones [Hospital maternity. Standards and Recommendations]. Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social (In Spanish). Retrieved from https://www.sanidad.gob.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/docs/AHP.pdf
MSPSI - Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad (2011a). Estrategia Nacional de Salud Sexual y Reproductiva [National Strategy for Sexual and Reproductive Health]. Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad (In Spanish). Retrieved from https://www.sanidad.gob.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/pdf/equidad/ENSSR.pdf
MSPSI - Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad (2011b). Plan de Parto y Nacimiento [Labour and Birth Plan] [In Spanish]. Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad. (In Spanish). Retrieved from https://www.sanidad.gob.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/pdf/equidad/planPartoNacimiento.pdf
MSPSI - Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad (2015). Informe sobre la atención al parto y nacimiento en el Sistema Nacional de Salud [Report on childbirth and childbirth care in the National Health System]. Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad. (In Spanish). Retrieved from https://www.sanidad.gob.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/pdf/InformeFinalEAPN_revision8marzo2015.pdf
Molgora, S., Fenaroli, V., Cracolici, E., & Saita, E. (2020). Antenatal fear of childbirth and emergency cesarean section delivery: A systematic narrative review. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 38, 436–454.
Napoles, C., & Piloto, M. (2012). Consideraciones actuales sobre la operación cesárea [Current Considerations About Cesarean Section]. MEDISAN, 16, 1579–1595 (In Spanish).
Nedergaard, H. K., Balaganeshan, T., Weitling, E. E., Petersen, H. S., & Brøchner, A. C. (2022). Presence of the partner in the operating room during emergency caesarean section: A scoping review. Europan Journal of Anaesthesiology, 39, 939–952.
NICE - National Institute of Health and Care Experience. (2011). Caesarian section. NICE Clinical guideline 13. NICE.
Pereda-Goikoetxea, B., Huitzi-Egilegor, J. X., Zubeldia-Etxeberria, J., Uranga-Iturrioz, M. J., & Elorza-Puyadena, M. I. (2021). Hospital childbirth: Perspectives of women and professionals for a positive experience—a qualitative study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 10238.
Pereda-Goikoetxea, B., Marín-Fernández, B., Liceaga-Otazu, N. E., & Elorza-Puyadena, M. I. (2019). A qualitative study of hospital birth perceptions: The helix of priority needs. Midwifery, 74, 91–98.
Porter, M., Van Teijlingen, E., Yip, L. C. Y., & Bhattachaya, S. (2007). Satisfaction with Cesarean section: Qualitative analysis of open-ended questions in a large postal survey. Birth, 32, 148–154.
Prabhu, M., Wang, L. F., Tait, A. R., & Bullough, A. S. (2009). A randomized controlled study of whether the partner’s presence in the operating room during neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery reduces patient anxiety. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 18, 362–367.
Ramírez, H., & Rodríguez, I. (2014). Beneficios del acompañamiento a la mujer por parte de su pareja durante el embarazo, el parto y el puerperio en relación con el vínculo paternofilial. Revisión bibliográfica [Benefits of accompanying the woman by her partner during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium in relation to the father–child bond. Bibliographic review]. Matronas Profesión, 15, e1–e6 (In Spanish).
Ryding, E. L., Wijma, K., & Wijma, B. (1998). Experiences of emergency cesarean section: A phenomenological study of 53 women. Birth, 25, 246–251.
Sakala, E. (1985). Perinatal professionals’ view of fathers in the cesarean room. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4, 285–293.
Seisdedos, N. (1982). STAI: Cuestionario de Ansiedad Estado Rasgo [STAI: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory]. TEA.
Shetty, A., Burt, R., Rice, P., & Templeton, A. (2005). Women’s perceptions, expectations and satisfaction with induced labour—a questionnaire-based study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 123, 56–61.
Smiley, R. (2004). Opposer: Partners should be allowed to stay in the operating theatre during caesarean section under general anaesthesia. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 13, 253–256.
Smith, J., Plaat, F., & Fisk, N. (2008). The natural cesarean: A woman-centred technique. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 115, 1037–1042.
Spielberg, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). STAI, Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologist Press.
Suresh, D., & Ravalia, A. (1989). Analgesia for manipulation under anaesthesia after total knee replacement. Anaesthesia, 44, 933–934.
Taylor, I. R., Bullough, A. S., Van Hamel, J. C., & Campbell, D. N. (2002). Partner anxiety prior to elective Caesarean section under regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 7, 600–605.
Tessier España, E., Camaño Gutiérrez, I., García Burguillo, A., Hernández García, J. M., VellidoCotelo, R., De la Hera, C., & Oliver Pérez, M. R. (2013). Cesárea humanizada [Humanized caesarean section]. Progresos De Obstetrícia y Ginecología, 56, 73–78 (In Spanish).
Thorp, J. M., Kennedy, B. W., Millar, K., & Fitch, W. (1993). Personality traits as predictors of anxiety prior to Caesarian section under regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 48, 946–950.
Wielganczuk, R. P., Zani, A. V., Maziero, C. P., Bernardy, C. C. F., Rodrigues, M. H., & Pinto, K. R. T. F. (2022). Perceptions of health professionals about the presence of the accompanying party at birth. Revista De Pesquisa Cuidado é Fundamental [internet], 14, e10830.
Xu, H., Ding, Y., Ma, Y., Xin, X., & Zhang, D. (2017). Cesarean section and risk of postpartum depression: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 97, 118–126.
Zanardo, V., Giliberti, L., Giliberti, E., Volpe, F., Straface, G., & Greco, P. (2018). The role of elective and emergency cesarean delivery in maternal postpartum anhedonia, anxiety, and depression. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 143, 374–378.
Acknowledgements
To all volunteers, mothers and partners, included in the Study, as well as to all the staff involved in the treatment of our patients.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NOG: Conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, project administration, resources, software, supervision, validation, visualization, formal analysis, writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. JC: Conceptualization, data curation, resources, writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. SPC: Investigation, data curation, writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. J-CO: Methodology, investigation, data curation, software, supervision, validation, visualization, formal analysis, writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. YCE: Writing—original draft; writing—review and editing. JGT: Writing—original draft; Writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The institutional ethics board of the Parc Taulí Hospital approved the study.
Consent to Participate
Participation in the study was voluntary and the information provided was anonymous and confidential. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to participation in the study.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gutiérrez, N.O., Cobo, J., Calsina, S.P. et al. The Effects of Accompaniment on Maternal Anxiety During Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Quasi-experimental Study. Matern Child Health J 27, 1352–1360 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-023-03677-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-023-03677-6