Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors Influencing Provider Behavior Around Delivery of Preconception Care

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Despite growing consensus about the clinical value of preconception care (PCC), gaps and disparities remain in its delivery. This study aimed to examine the factors influencing behavior of health care providers around PCC in outpatient clinical settings in the United States.

Methods

Twenty health care providers who serve people of reproductive age were interviewed using semi-structured interviews. Data was coded based on a modified Theoretical Domains Framework and analyzed using deductive content analysis.

Results

We interviewed eight family medicine physicians, four obstetricians/gynecologists, seven nurse practitioners, and one nurse midwife. Overall, we found a wide variety in practices and attitudes towards PCC. Barriers and challenges to delivering PCC were shared across sites. We identified six themes that influenced provider behavior around PCC: (1) lack of knowledge of PCC guidelines, (2) perception of lack of preconception patient contact, (3) pessimism around patient “compliance,” (4) opinion about scope of practice, (5) clinical site structure, and (6) reliance on the patient/provider relationship.

Conclusions for Practice

Overall, our findings call for improved provider understanding of PCC and creative incorporation into current health care culture and practice. Given that PCC-specific visits are perceived by some as outside the norm of clinical offerings, providers may need to incorporate PCC into other encounters, as many in this study reported doing. We amplify the call for providers to understand how structural inequities may influence patient behavior and the value of standardized screening, within and beyond PCC, as well as examination of implicit and explicit provider bias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Upon request and with appropriate IRB approval.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2019). ACOG Committee opinion No. 762: Prepregnancy counseling. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 133(1), e78–e89. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, L., Francis, J., Islam, R., O’Connor, D., Patey, A., Ivers, N., Foy, R., Duncan, E. M., Colquhoun, H., Grimshaw, J. M., Lawton, R., & Michie, S. (2017). A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implementation Science, 12(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, E. N., Kaatz, A., & Carnes, M. (2013). Physicians and implicit bias: How doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(11), 1504–1510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-013-2441-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, S. V., Lassi, Z. S., Imam, A. M., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2014). Preconception care: Closing the gap in the continuum of care to accelerate improvements in maternal, newborn and child health. Reproductive Health, 11(Suppl 3), S1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-S3-S1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Farahi, N., & Zolotor, A. (2013). Recommendations for preconception counseling and care. American Family Physician, 88(8), 499–506.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frayne, D. J. (2017). Preconception care is primary care: A call to action. American Family Physician, 96(8), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern-Meekin, S., Costanzo, M., Ehrenthal, D., & Rhoades, G. (2019). Intimate partner violence screening in the prenatal period: Variation by state, insurance, and patient characteristics. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 23(6), 756–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2692-x.

  • Heyes, T. (2004). Preconception care: Practice and beliefs of primary care workers. Family Practice, 21(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmh106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K., Posner, S. F., Biermann, J., Cordero, J. F., Atrash, H. K., Parker, C. S., Boulet, S., Curtis, M. G., CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group, & Select Panel on Preconception Care. (2006). Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care—United States. A report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the select panel on preconception care. MMWR. Recommendations and Reports: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Recommendations and Reports, 55(RR-6), 1–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kroelinger, C. D., Okoroh, E. M., Boulet, S. L., Olson, C. K., & Robbins, C. L. (2018). Making the case: The importance of using 10 key preconception indicators in understanding the health of women of reproductive age. Journal of Women’s Health, 27(6), 739–743. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.7034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lassi, Z. S., Dean, S. V., Mallick, D., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2014). Preconception care: Delivery strategies and packages for care. Reproductive Health, 11(Suppl 3), S7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-S3-S7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • M’hamdi, H. I., van Voorst, S. F., Pinxten, W., Hilhorst, M. T., & Steegers, E. A. P. (2017). Barriers in the uptake and delivery of preconception care: Exploring the views of care providers. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 21(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2089-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michie, S. (2005). Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: A consensus approach. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.011155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. A., Hawks, D., Zinberg, S., & Schulkin, J. (2006). What obstetrician–gynecologists think of preconception care. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 10(S1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-006-0086-y

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, S. F., Johnson, K., Parker, C., Atrash, H., & Biermann, J. (2006). The national summit on preconception care: A summary of concepts and recommendations. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 10(5 Suppl), S197-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-006-0107-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, C., Boulet, S. L., Morgan, I., D’Angelo, D. V., Zapata, L. B., Morrow, B., Sharma, A., & Kroelinger, C. D. (2018). Disparities in preconception health indicators—Behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2013-2015, and pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system, 2013–2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries (Washington, D.C.: 2002), 67(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss6701a1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, M. A., Quiroga, S. S., & Bauer, H. M. (1996). Breaking the silence. Battered women’s perspectives on medical care. Archives of Family Medicine, 5(3), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.5.3.153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siu, A. L., US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Bibbins-Domingo, K., Grossman, D. C., Baumann, L. C., Davidson, K. W., Ebell, M., García, F. A. R., Gillman, M., Herzstein, J., Kemper, A. R., Krist, A. H., Kurth, A. E., Owens, D. K., Phillips, W. R., Phipps, M. G., & Pignone, M. P. (2016). Screening for depression in adults: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA, 315(4), 380–387. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.18392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, A., Lucke, J., Reid, R., & Adams, J. (2016). A systematic review of women’s and health professional’s attitudes and experience of preconception care service delivery. Family Practice, 33(6), 588–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmw094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Temel, S., van Voorst, S. F., Jack, B. W., Denktaş, S., & Steegers, E. A. P. (2014). Evidence-based preconceptional lifestyle interventions. Epidemiologic Reviews, 36(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxt003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • US Preventive Services Task Force, Curry, S. J., Krist, A. H., Owens, D. K., Barry, M. J., Caughey, A. B., Davidson, K. W., Doubeni, C. A., Epling, J. W., Grossman, D. C., Kemper, A. R., Kubik, M., Kurth, A., Landefeld, C. S., Mangione, C. M., Silverstein, M., Simon, M. A., Tseng, C.-W., & Wong, J. B. (2018). Screening for intimate partner violence, elder abuse, and abuse of vulnerable adults: US preventive services task force final recommendation statement. JAMA, 320(16), 1678–1687. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Zee, B., de Beaufort, I., Temel, S., de Wert, G., Denktas, S., & Steegers, E. (2011). Preconception care: An essential preventive strategy to improve children’s and women’s health. Journal of Public Health Policy, 32(3), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2011.13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2013). Meeting to develop a global consensus on preconception care to reduce maternal and childhood mortality and morbidity: World Health Organization Headquarters, Geneva, 6–7 February 2012: Meeting report. World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding for this work was provided by the Herman and Gwendolyn Shapiro Foundation and the Population Research Infrastructure grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (P2C HD047873). The Social Sciences Computing Cooperative at the University of Wisconsin-Madison provided technological support. The authors thank Ann Vitous of the Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy at the University of Michigan for providing guidance on the Theoretical Domains Framework used in this analysis.

Funding

This research was supported by the Herman and Gwendolyn Shapiro Foundation at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Population Research Infrastructure grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (P2C HD047873).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. ECN recruited participants, conducted interviews, coded transcripts, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the final manuscript. Dr. MZG advised on the design of the analysis, coded transcripts, reviewed and contributed to themes, critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. Dr. MPT recruited participants, conducted interviews, coded transcripts, reviewed and contributed to themes, and reviewed and revised the final manuscript. Dr. DBE conceptualized the study, critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content, and reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin C. Nacev.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

The study was deemed exempt by the University of Wisconsin–Madison Institutional Review Board.

Consent to Participate

All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects were omitted.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nacev, E.C., Greene, M.Z., Taboada, M.P. et al. Factors Influencing Provider Behavior Around Delivery of Preconception Care. Matern Child Health J 26, 1567–1575 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-022-03411-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-022-03411-8

Keywords

Navigation