Abstract
Introduction
With shifting demographics and declining response rates, state and national health surveys are considering mixed mode approaches. Most states field the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) surveillance project, but few have studied the effect of encouraging online responses.
Methods
Like PRAMS, the 2016 Ohio Pregnancy Assessment Survey interviewed new mothers 2–4 months after delivery (n = 3382). Fielding included a traditional mailed paper questionnaire with telephone follow-up protocol and two experiments: a rotating web invitation added a web survey link at different points during the mail protocol, and a push-to-web protocol asked women to complete the survey online before mailing a questionnaire. This analysis examined the responses rates and tested for unweighted demographic differences using Pearson’s chi-square.
Results
The unweighted response rate was highest with the traditional contact protocol (30.0%) and slightly lower among the rotating web invite (27.4%) and the push-to-web (25.5%) groups. Nearly two-thirds (64%) of push-to-web protocol respondents completed the survey online, with 70% of those web surveys submitted before the first paper questionnaire was mailed. Women who responded to the web versus mail surveys were similar on most characteristics, although in both experimental groups, women who completed the web version were more likely to be college educated. Among the push-to-web group, 60% of web and 36% of mail respondents had a 4-year college degree (p < .001).
Discussion
Given the potential for push-to-web to shift respondents to an online survey without greatly impacting response rates, researchers should continue to examine the utility of incorporating a web mode in surveys of new mothers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Binkley, T., Beare, T., Minette, M., Koepp, K., Wey, H., & Specker, B. (2017). Response to an online version of a PRAMS-like survey in South Dakota. Maternal and Child Health Journal,21, 335–342.
Dillman, D. (2017). The promise and challenge of pushing respondents to the web in mixed-mode surveys. Survey Methodology,43, 3–30.
Dillman, D., Smyth, J., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
Ghandour, R. M. (2018). The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): Current strengths and opportunities for growth. American Journal of Public Health,108, 1303–1304.
Ghandour, R. M., Jones, J. R., Lebrun-Harris, L. A., Minnaert, J., Blumber, S. J., Fields, J., et al. (2018). The design and implementation of the 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health. Maternal and Child Health Journal,22, 1093–1102.
Mauz, E., von der Lippe, E., Allen, J., Schilling, R., Müters, S., Hoebel, J., et al. (2018). Mixing modes in a population-based interview survey: Comparison of a sequential and a concurrent mixed-mode design for public health research. Archives of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-017-0237-1.
McGonagle, K. A., & Freedman, V. A. (2017). The effects of a delayed incentive on response rates, response mode, data quality, and sample bias in a national representative mixed mode study. Field Methods,29, 221–237.
McMaster, H. S., Leardmann, C., Speigle, S., & Dillman, D. (2017). An experimental comparison of web-push vs. paper-only survey procedures for conducting an in-depth health survey of military spouses. BMC Medical Research Methodology,17, 1–9.
Medway, R., & Fulton, J. (2012). When more gets you less: A meta-analysis of concurrent web options on mail survey response rates. Public Opinion Quarterly,76, 733–746.
Ohio Department of Health. (2018). Ohio Pregnancy Assessment Survey (OPAS): Data requests. Retrieved February 2019, from, https://odh.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/odh/know-our-programs/ohio-pregnancy-assessment-survey-opas/data-requests/
Patrick, M. E., Couper, M. P., Laetz, V. B., Schulenberg, J. E., O’Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., et al. (2018). A sequential mixed-mode experiment in the U.S. national monitoring the future study. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology,6, 72–97.
Shulman, H. B., D’Angel, D. V., Harrison, L., Smith, R. A., & Warner, L. (2018). The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): Overview of design and methodology. American Journal of Public Health,108, 1305–1313.
Acknowledgements
The Ohio Pregnancy Assessment Survey is funded by the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) and the Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) and administered by the Ohio Colleges of Medicine Government Resource Center. The views expressed in this manuscript are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views of the state of Ohio or federal Medicaid programs. This study includes data provided by ODH and ODM which should not be considered an endorsement of this study or its conclusions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tumin, R., Johnson, K., Spence, D. et al. The Effectiveness of “Push-to-Web” as an Option for a Survey of New Mothers. Matern Child Health J 24, 960–965 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-020-02936-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-020-02936-0