Abstract
Objectives Perinatal Quality Collaboratives across the United States are initiating projects to improve health and healthcare for women and infants. We compared an evidence-based group prenatal care model to usual individual prenatal care on birth outcomes in a multi-site expansion of group prenatal care supported by a state-wide multidisciplinary Perinatal Quality Collaborative. Methods We analyzed 15,330 pregnant women aged 14–48 across 13 healthcare practices in South Carolina (2013–2017) using a preferential-within cluster matching propensity score method and logistic regression. Outcomes were extracted from birth certificate data. We compared outcomes for (a) women at the intent-to-treat level and (b) for women participating in at least five group prenatal care visits to women with less than five group visits with at least five prenatal visits total. Results In the intent-to-treat analyses, women who received group prenatal care were significantly less likely to have preterm births (absolute risk difference − 3.2%, 95% CI − 5.3 to − 1.0%), low birth weight births (absolute risk difference − 3.7%, 95% CI − 5.5 to − 1.8%) and NICU admissions (absolute risk difference − 4.0%, 95% CI − 5.6 to − 2.3%). In the as-treated analyses, women had greater improvements compared to intent-to-treat analyses in preterm birth and low birth weight outcomes. Conclusions for Practice CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care is effective across a range of real-world clinical practices for decreasing the risk of preterm birth and low birth weight. This is a feasible approach for other Perinatal Quality Collaboratives to attempt in their ongoing efforts at improving maternal and infant health outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists. (n.d.). Alliance for innovation on maternal health. https://www.acog.org/About-ACOG/ACOG-Departments/Patient-Safety-and-Quality-Improvement/What-is-AIM. Accessed May 30, 2018.
Arpino, B., & Cannas, M. (2016). Propensity score matching with clustered data. An application to the estimation of the impact of caesarean section on the APGAR score. Statistics in Medicine, 35(12), 2074–2091.
Bryson, A., Dorsett, R., & Purdon, S. (2002). The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of active labour market policies. London: Department for Work and Pensions.
Carter, E. B., Temming, L. A., Akin, J., Fowler, S., Macones, G. A., Colditz, G. A., et al. (2016). Group prenatal care compared with traditional prenatal care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 128(3), 551–561.
Centers for Disease Control & Prevention. (2018). Perinatal quality collaboratives. https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/pqc.htm. Accessed May 30, 2018.
Crockett, A., Heberlein, E. C., Glasscock, L., Covington-Kolb, S., Shea, K., & Khan, I. A. (2017). Investing in CenteringPregnancy™ group prenatal care reduces newborn hospitalization costs. Women’s Health Issues, 27(1), 60–66.
Cunningham, S. D., Grilo, S., Lewis, J. B., Novick, G., Rising, S. S., Tobin, J. N., et al. (2017). Group prenatal care attendance: Determinants and relationship with care satisfaction. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 21(4), 770–776.
Cunningham, S. D., Lewis, J. B., Shebl, F. M., Boyd, L. M., Robinson, M. A., Grilo, S. A., et al. (2018). Group prenatal care reduces risk of preterm birth and low birth weight: A matched cohort study. Journal of Women’s Health. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2017.6817.
Gareau, S., Lòpez-De Fede, A., Loudermilk, B. L., Cummings, T. H., Hardin, J. W., Picklesimer, A. H., et al. (2016). Group prenatal care results in Medicaid savings with better outcomes: A propensity score analysis of CenteringPregnancy participation in South Carolina. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 20(7), 1384–1393.
Gupta, M., Donovan, E. F., & Henderson, Z. (2017). State-based perinatal quality collaboratives: Pursuing improvements in perinatal health outcomes for all mothers and newborns. Paper presented at the Seminars in perinatology.
Hale, N., Picklesimer, A. H., Billings, D. L., & Covington-Kolb, S. (2014). The impact of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on postpartum family planning. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 210(1), 50.e51–50.e57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.001.
Hassan, S., Romero, R., Vidyadhari, D., Fusey, S., Baxter, J., Khandelwal, M., et al. (2011). Vaginal progesterone reduces the rate of preterm birth in women with a sonographic short cervix: A multicenter, randomized, double- blind, placebo- controlled trial. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 38(1), 18–31.
Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. The Review of Economic Studies, 65(2), 261–294.
Henderson, Z. T., Suchdev, D. B., Abe, K., Johnston, E. O., & Callaghan, W. M. (2014). Perinatal quality collaboratives: Improving care for mothers and infants. Journal of Women’s Health, 23(5), 368–372.
Ickovics, J. R., Earnshaw, V., Lewis, J. B., Kershaw, T. S., Magriples, U., Stasko, E., et al. (2016). Cluster randomized controlled trial of group prenatal care: Perinatal outcomes among adolescents in New York City health centers. American Journal of Public Health, 106(2), 359–365.
Ickovics, J. R., Kershaw, T. S., Westdahl, C., Magriples, U., Massey, Z., Reynolds, H., et al. (2007). Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 110(2), 330–339.
Meis, P. J., Klebanoff, M., Thom, E., Dombrowski, M. P., Sibai, B., Moawad, A. H., et al. (2003). Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(24), 2379–2385.
Picklesimer, A. H., Billings, D., Hale, N., Blackhurst, D., & Covington-Kolb, S. (2012). The effect of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on preterm birth in a low-income population. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 206(5), 415.e411–415.e417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.040.
Rising, S. S., Kennedy, H. P., & Klima, C. S. (2004). Redesigning prenatal care through CenteringPregnancy. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 49(5), 398–404.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38.
Rubin, D. B. (2007). The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: Parallels with the design of randomized trials. Statistics in Medicine, 26(1), 20–36.
Schneider, P. D., Sabol, B. A., King, P. A. L., Caughey, A. B., & Borders, A. E. (2017). The hard work of improving outcomes for mothers and babies: Obstetric and perinatal quality improvement initiatives make a difference at the hospital, state, and national levels. Clinics in Perinatology, 44(3), 511–528.
South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. (2016). The Birth Outcomes Initiative. https://www.scdhhs.gov/organizations/south-carolina-birth-outcomes-initiative. Accessed August 15, 2018.
South Carolina Community Assessment Network (SCAN). (2016). http://scangis.dhec.sc.gov/scan/bdp/tables/birthtable.aspx. Accessed December 15, 2017
Tanner-Smith, E. E., Steinka-Fry, K. T., & Gesell, S. B. (2014a). Comparative effectiveness of group and individual prenatal care on gestational weight gain. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18, 1711–1720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1413-8.
Tanner-Smith, E., Steinka-Fry, K., & Lipsey, M. (2012). A multi-site evaluation of the CenteringPregnancy programs in Tennessee: Final report prepared for the Tennessee Department of Health. Nashville, TN: Peabody Research Institute, Vanderbilt University.
Tanner-Smith, E. E., Steinka-Fry, K. T., & Lipsey, M. W. (2014b). The effects of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on gestational age, birth weight, and fetal demise. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 18(4), 801–809.
Urban Institute. (2018). Strong start for mothers and newborns evaluation: Year 5 project synthesis. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. https://downloads.cms.gov/files/cmmi/strongstart-prenatal-finalevalrpt-v1.pdf. Accessed January 25, 2019.
Funding
South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services funded this study. The sponsor has not been involved in study design, data analysis, or writing of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crockett, A.H., Heberlein, E.C., Smith, J.C. et al. Effects of a Multi-site Expansion of Group Prenatal Care on Birth Outcomes. Matern Child Health J 23, 1424–1433 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-019-02795-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-019-02795-4