Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Qualitative Description of Pregnancy-Related Social Support Experiences of Low-Income Women with Low Birth Weight Infants in the Midwestern United States

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective Low birth weight (LBW) is a significant health problem in the United States, and the incidence is higher in women with low socioeconomic status. Observational and epidemiological studies have revealed that social support reduces the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, the current literature lacks research regarding the perceived social support of pregnant women in relation to birth weight from a qualitative perspective. This study explored the perceptions and experiences of social support during pregnancy among low-income women who had recently given birth to a LBW infant. Method A qualitative descriptive design was used to explore women’s social support experiences during pregnancy. The sample comprised 15 women who had given birth to a LBW infant within the past 9 months from the five urban and rural WIC clinics in the Midwest United States and a university hospital neonatal clinic. In-depth semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. Results Three themes emerged: women’s experience of pregnancy; challenges faced by women during pregnancy; and availability of essential supports for women during pregnancy. The father of the infant and female relatives were identified as major sources of support during pregnancy, and the women in the sample expressed a desire to obtain social support from family and friends. Conclusion for Practice Women from low socioeconomic backgrounds face various challenges that could adversely affect birth outcomes. Social support may minimize the impact of adverse life situations. Providing adequate social support requires addressing the multiple dimensions of social support and strengthening the existing support system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abadi, M. N. L., Ghazinour, M., Nygren, L., Nojomi, M., & Ritchter, J. (2013). Birth weight, domestic violence, coping, social support and mental health of young Iranian mothers in Tehran. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 7, 602–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, R.E., & Butler, A.S. (2007). Pre-term birth: Causes, consequences and prevention. Retrieved February 2, 2016 from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11622

  • Blumenshine, P., Egerter, S., Barclay, C. J., Cubbin, C., & Braveman, P. A. (2010). Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes. A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 39, 263–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd-Craven, J., & Massey, A. R. (2013). Lean on me: Effect of social support on low socio-economic status pregnant women. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15, 374–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Reproductive and birth outcomes. Low birth weight and environment. Retrieved October 26, 2016, from http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/showRbLBWGrowthRetardationEnv.action

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Mortality in the United States, 2016. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db293.htm

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Singleton low birthweight rates, by race and hispanic origin: United States, 20062016. Retrieved March 21, 2018, from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db306.htm

  • Chongo, C., & Ngoma, C. M. (2014). Pregant women’s perceptions of provision of social support during pregnancy and child birth. Standard Research Journal of Nursing and Midwifery, 1, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvill, R., Skirton, H., & Farrand, P. (2010). Psychological factors that impact on women’s experiences of first time motherhood: A qualitative study of the transition. Midwifery, 26, 357–366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, P. J., Dunkel-Shetter, C., Sandman, C. A., & Wadhawa, P. D. (2000). Maternal social support predicts birth weight and fetal growth in human pregnancy. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62, 715–725.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleuriet, K. J. (2009). Problems in the Latina Paradox: Measuring social support for the pregnant immigrant women in Mexico. Anthropology and Medicine, 16, 49–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Granaheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2001). Guidelines and checklist for constructivist evaluation. Evaluation Checklist Project (pp. 1–15).

  • Hodnett, E. D., Fredericks, S., & Weston, J. (2010). Support during pregnancy for women at risk for low birth weight babies (review). The Cochrane Collaboration. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000198.pub2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Q., Lu, M. C., & Schetter, C. D. (2005). Learning from success and failure in psychosocial intervention: An evaluation of low birth weight prevention trials. Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 185–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Osterman, M. J. K., Driscoll, A. K., & Drake, P. (2018). National vital statistical reports. Births: Final data for 2016. National Vital Statistical Reports, 67(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkanash-Amankra, S., Dhawain, A., Hussey, J. R., & Luchok, K. J. (2010). Maternal social support and neighborhood income inequality as predictors of low birth weight and pre-term birth outcome disparities: Analysis of South Carolina pregnancy risk assessment and monitoring system survey, 2000–2003. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14, 774–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novick, G. (2008). Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?. Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 391–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, C., Merrell, S., & Kirk, J. K. (2016). Centering pregnancy: Meeting the quadruple aim in prenatal care. North Carolina Medical Journal, 77, 394–397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32 item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19, 349–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture. (2014). Women, infants and children. Retrieved October 10, 2018 from http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/wic-eligibility-requirements

  • United States Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020. (2018). Maternal, infant and child health. Retrieved October 2, 2018, from https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/data-search/Search-the-Data#objid=4903;

  • Wado, Y. D., Afework, M. F., & Hindin, M. J. (2014). Effects of maternal pregnancy intention, depressive symptoms, and social support on risk of low birth weight: A prospective study from Southwestern Ethiopia. Public Library of Science One, 9, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Murphy, S. L., Kochanek, K. D., Bastian, B., & Arias, E. (2018). National vital statistics reports. Deaths: Final data for 2016. National Vital Statistical Reports., 67(5), 1–76.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research study was funded by Frances Crighton and Dr Valmi De Sousa awards at the University of Kansas School of Nursing. We thank Markeda Wade, Scientific Editor at Cizik School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston for editing this manuscript. The authors are grateful to all the women who participated in the study. It was an honor to learn your stories during an important period of your life time. We express our sincere gratitude to all the directors, dietitians and support staff of the WIC clinics and the neonatal clinic for your support in recruiting the participants for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doncy J. Eapen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eapen, D.J., Wambach, K. & Domian, E.W. A Qualitative Description of Pregnancy-Related Social Support Experiences of Low-Income Women with Low Birth Weight Infants in the Midwestern United States. Matern Child Health J 23, 1473–1481 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-019-02789-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-019-02789-2

Keywords

Navigation