Socioeconomic Position and Reproduction: Findings from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health
- 288 Downloads
Objective: To investigate the association of socioeconomic position (SEP) with reproductive outcomes among Australian women. Methods: Data from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health’s (population-based cohort study) 1973–1978 cohort were used (N = 6899, aged 37–42 years in 2015). The association of SEP (childhood and own, multiple indicators) with age at first birth, birth-to-pregnancy (BTP) intervals and total number of children was analysed using multinomial logistic regression. Results: 14% of women had their first birth aged < 24 years. 29% of multiparous women had a BTP interval within the WHO recommendation (18–27 months). Women with a low SEP had increased odds of a first birth < 24 years: low (OR 7.0: 95% C.I. 5.3, 9.3) or intermediate education (OR 3.8: 2.8, 5.1); living in rural (OR 1.8: 1.5, 2.2) or remote (OR 2.1: 1.7, 2.7) areas; who found it sometimes (OR 1.8: 1.5, 2.2) or always difficult (OR 2.0: 1.6, 2.7) to manage on their income; and did not know their parent’s education (OR 4.5: 3.2, 6.4). Low SEP was associated with having a much longer than recommended BTP interval. Conclusion: As the first Australian study describing social differences in reproductive characteristics, these findings provide a base for reducing social inequalities in reproduction. Assisting adequate BTP spacing is important, particularly for women with existing elevated risks due to social disadvantage; including having a first birth < 24 years of age and a longer than recommended BTP interval. This includes reviewing services/access to postnatal support, free family planning/contraception clinics, and improved family policies.
KeywordsSocioeconomic position Educational status Reproduction Age at first birth Birth intervals Birth-to-pregnancy interval
The research on which this paper is based was conducted as part of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health, the University of Newcastle and the University of Queensland. We are grateful to the Australian Government Department of Health for funding and to the women who provided the survey data. N.H. is supported by the Australian Postgraduate Award scholarship and G.D.M. is supported by the Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT120100812). IK is supported by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (project 2006-1518). The Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health is funded by the Australian Government Department of Health.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2007). Recent increases in Australia’s fertility. 4102.0 Australian Social Trends, 2007. Retrieved October 10, 2016 from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/0/0FC193CDB42A241BCA25732C00206FBC
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). (2015). Australia’s mothers and babies 2013–in brief. Perinatal statistics series no. 31. Cat no. PER 72. Retrieved October 10, 2016 from http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129553770
- Bobrow, K., Quigley, M., Green, J., Reeves, G., Beral, V., & Million Women Study Collaborators (2013). Persistent effects of women’s parity and breastfeeding patterns on their body mass index: Results from the Million Women Study. International Journal of Obesity, 37(5), 712–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cordero, J. (2009). El espaciamiento de los nacimientos: Una estrategia para conciliar tranajo y familia en Espana (Birth spacing: A strategy for combining work and family in Spain). Revista Espanola de Investigaciones Sociologicas (REIS), 128, 11–33.Google Scholar
- Department of Health, Australia (DoHA). (2009). The Australian National Breastfeeding Strategy 2010–2015. Retrieved October 1, 2016 from http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/aust-breastfeeding-strategy-2010-2015.
- Hilder, L., Zhichao, Z., Parker, M., Jahan, S., & Chambers, G. (2014). Australia’s mothers and babies 2012. Retrieved October 1, 2016 from http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-detail/?id=60129550033.
- Marston, C. (2005). Report of a WHO technical consultation on birth spacing. Retrieved October 1, 2016 from http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/birth_spacing05/en/.
- McMahon, C., Boivin, J., Gibson, F., Hammarberg, K., Wynter, K., Saunders, D., & Fisher, J. (2011). Age at first birth, mode of conception and psychological wellbeing in pregnancy: Findings from the parental age and transition to parenthood Australia (PATPA) study. Human Reproduction, 26(6), 1389–1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pink, B. (2013). Technical paper: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2011. (2033.0.55.001). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics Retrieved October 1, 2016 from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2033.0.55.001.
- Pirkle, C., de Albuquerque Sousa, A., Alvarado, B., Zunzunequi, M., & IMIAS Research Group (2014). Early maternal age at first birth is associated with chronic diseases and poor physical performance in older age: Cross-sectional analysis from the International Mobility in Aging Study. BMC Public Health, 14, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Restrepo-Mendez, M. C., Lawlor, D. A., Horta, B. L., Matijasevich, A., Santos, I. S., Menezes, A. M., Barros, F. C., & Victora, C. G. (2015). The association of maternal age with birthweight and gestational age: A cross-cohort comparison. Paediatric Perinatal Epidemiology, 29(1), 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organisation (WHO). (2013). BMI classification. Global Database on Body Mass Index. Retrieved October 10 2016, from http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.html.