Skip to main content

Inequality and Innovation: Barriers and Facilitators to 17P Administration to Prevent Preterm Birth among Medicaid Participants

A Correction to this article was published on 30 November 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Objectives Strategies to prevent preterm birth are limited. 17 Alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate (17P) injections have been shown to be effective, but the intervention is under-used. This mixed methods study investigates barriers and facilitators to 17P administration among Medicaid and CHIP participants enrolled in Strong Start for Mothers and Newborns, a federal preterm birth prevention program. Methods Twenty-seven awardees with more than 200 sites in 30 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico enrolled approximately 46,000 women in Strong Start from 2013 to 2016. Participant data, including data on preterm birth and 17P, was collected for each woman. Intensive interviews (n = 211) conducted with Strong Start program staff and providers (n = 314) included questions about 17P provision. Results Of women whose data included a valid response regarding 17P initiation, 3919 had a prior preterm birth and current singleton pregnancy; 14.95% received 17P. Barriers to 17P administration include late entry to prenatal care, administrative burden of preauthorization, cost risks to providers, limits in scope of practice for non-physician providers, and social barriers among participants. Facilitators for provision include streamlined work flows and the option of home administration. Conclusions for Practice A universal insurance authorization process could mitigate many barriers to 17P use. Providers need continuing education regarding the effectiveness of 17P, and expanding scope of practice for non-physician prenatal care providers would increase access. Targeted program interventions can help to overcome social barriers Medicaid participants face in accessing care. Streamlined work processes and the option of home health services are two effective program-based facilitators for providing 17P to a Medicaid population.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Change history

  • 30 November 2018

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in the order of authors. The co-author “Sarah Benatar” should be the second author and “Brigette Courtot” should be the third author of the article.

  • 30 November 2018

    The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake in the order of authors. The co-author ���Sarah Benatar��� should be the second author and ���Brigette Courtot��� should be the third author of the article.

Notes

  1. Specific questions asked were: “We are trying to learn more about Strong Start sites’ use of 17P (17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate) to prevent preterm births. Does 17P administration play a role in your Strong Start intervention? (Please describe.) Based on participant level data you’ve submitted, through the first quarter of 2015 around [awardee specific percentage] of participants had received 17P treatment during their pregnancy. Does this reflect your experience? (Please explain.) Is Medicaid/CHIP reimbursement an issue? How about patient compliance?

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Strong Start awardee staff and providers who gave so freely of their time and who collected the participant-level data needed for this study. We also thank the Strong Start evaluation team at the Urban Institute, in particular Jenny Markell, for their assistance in developing this manuscript. We thank William Clark and the Strong Start Program and Learning teams at the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation for their ongoing support and feedback.

Funding

This research was funded by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caitlin Cross-Barnet.

Additional information

Disclaimer

The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the US Department of Health and Human Services or any of its agencies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cross-Barnet, C., Courtot, B., Benatar, S. et al. Inequality and Innovation: Barriers and Facilitators to 17P Administration to Prevent Preterm Birth among Medicaid Participants. Matern Child Health J 22, 1607–1616 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2556-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2556-4

Keywords

  • Preterm birth
  • 17 Alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17P)
  • Medicaid
  • Barriers to care
  • Prenatal care
  • Maternal health
  • Health disparities