Advertisement

Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 679–684 | Cite as

Content of First Prenatal Visits

  • J. Dyer
  • G. Latendresse
  • E. Cole
  • J. Coleman
  • E. Rothwell
Article
  • 252 Downloads

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to examine the content of the first prenatal visit within an academic medical center clinic and to compare the topics discussed to 2014 American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists guidelines for the initial prenatal visit. Methods Clinical interactions were audio recorded and transcribed (n = 30). A content analysis was used to identify topics discussed during the initial prenatal visit. Topics discussed were then compared to the 2014 ACOG guidelines for adherence. Coded data was queried though the qualitative software and reviewed for accuracy and content. Results First prenatal visits included a physician, nurse practitioner, nurse midwife, medical assistant, medical students, or a combination of these providers. In general, topics that were covered in most visits and closely adhered to ACOG guidelines included vitamin supplementation, laboratory testing, flu vaccinations, and cervical cancer screening. Topics discussed less often included many components of the physical examination, education about pregnancy, and screening for an identification of psychosocial risk. Least number of topics covered included prenatal screening. Conclusions for Practice While the ACOG guidelines may include many components that are traditional in addition to those based on evidence, the guidelines were not closely followed in this study. Identifying new ways to disseminate information during the time constrained initial prenatal visit are needed to ensure improved patient outcomes.

Keywords

Prenatal care Pregnancy guidelines Pregnancy Qualitative 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the University of Utah College of Nursing Research Committee, the Utah Center in Excellence in Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications in Research (UCEER; NIH HG009037), and the National Human Genome Research Institute (NIH; HD082148) for helping support this study.

References

  1. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 598: Committee on Adolescent Health Care The initial reproductive health visit. (2014). Obstetrics Gynecology, 123(5), 1143–1147.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000446826.46833.c0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77 Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. (2007). Obstetrics Gynecology, 109(1), 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ACOG/AAP. (2012). Guidelines for Perinatal Care: American Academy of Pediatrics and American college of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Washington, DC: Library of Congress Cataloging.Google Scholar
  4. Al-Ateeq, M. A., & Al-Rusaiess, A. A. (2015). Health education during antenatal care: the need for more. International Journal of Womens Health, 7, 239–242.  https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s75164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atlas.ti. (2015). Atlas.ti. Berlin: Scientific Softward Development.Google Scholar
  6. Baldwin, L., Raine, T., Jenkins, L. D., Hart, L. G., & Rosenblatt, R. (1994). Do providers adhere to ACOG standards? The case of prenatal care. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 84(4), 549–556.Google Scholar
  7. Chung, M., Ip, S., Yu, W., Raman, G., Trikalinos, T., DeVine, D., & Lau, J. (2008). Interventions in primary care to promote breastfeeding: A systematic review. Rockville MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.Google Scholar
  8. Clinical Guidelines. (2008). Primary care interventions to promote breastfeeding: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals Internal Medicine, 149(8), 560–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanson, L., VandeVusse, L., Roberts, J., & Forristal, A. (2009). A critical appraisal of guidelines for antenatal care: components of care and priorities in prenatal education. J Midwifery Womens Health, 54(6), 458–468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.08.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kirkham, C., Harris, S., & Grzybowski, S. (2005). Evidence-based prenatal care: Part I. General prenatal care and counseling issues. American Family Physician, 71(7), 1307–1316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kogan, M. D., Alexander, G. R., Kotelchuck, M., Nagey, D. A., & Jack, B. W. (1994). Comparing mothers’ reports on the content of prenatal care received with recommended national guidelines for care. Public Health Report, 109(5), 637–646.Google Scholar
  13. McBrien, B. (2008). Evidence-based care: enhancing the rigour of a qualitative study. British Journal of Nursing, 17(20), 1286–1289.  https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.20.31645.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nolan, M. L. (2009). Information giving and education in pregnancy: A review of qualitative studies. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 18(4), 21–30.  https://doi.org/10.1624/105812409X474681.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. PHS, U. S. (1989). Caring for our future: The content of prenatal care. A Report of the Public Health Service Expert Panel on the Content of Prenatal Care. (NIH-Pub-90-3182).Google Scholar
  16. Rothwell, E. (2010). Analyzing focus group data: Content and interaction. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 25(3), 202–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rothwell, E. W., Anderson, R. A., Burbank, M. J., Goldenberg, A. J., Lewis, M. H., Stark, L. A., … Botkin, J. R. (2011). Concerns of newborn screening advisory committee members regarding storage and use of residual newborn screening bloodspots. American Journal of Public Health, 101(4), 2111–2116.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2010.200485.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Rothwell, E., Anderson, R., Goldenberg, A., Lewis, M. H., Stark, L., Burbank, M., … Botkin, J. R. (2012). Assessing public attitudes on the retention and use of residual newborn screening blood samples: A focus group study. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1305–1309.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.12.047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. US Department of Labor. (1925). Standards of prenatal care: An outline for the use of physicians. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  20. Zolotor, A. J., & Carlough, M. C. (2014). Update on prenatal care. American Family Physician, 89(3), 199–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Dyer
    • 1
  • G. Latendresse
    • 1
  • E. Cole
    • 1
  • J. Coleman
    • 1
  • E. Rothwell
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.College of NursingUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  2. 2.Division of Medical Ethics and HumanitiesUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations