Purpose Engagement in policy is an essential public health service, with state legislatures serving as important arenas for activity on issues affecting children and families. However, a gap in communication often exists between policymakers and public health researchers who have the research knowledge to inform policy issues. We describe one tool for researchers to better leverage public health research to inform state legislative policymaking on issues of relevance to children and families. Description The Oregon Family Impact Seminar (OFIS), adapted from the Policy Institute for Family Impact Seminars, applies a systematic process to bring a synthesis of research findings on public health issues to state legislators using a six-step process: (1) identify candidate topics, (2) recruit legislative champions, (3) select the topic, (4) identify and prepare speakers, (5) host the presentations, and (6) develop and disseminate a research brief as a follow-up contact. Assessment Use of this model in Oregon has produced policy impact; for example, the 2015 presentation, “Two-Generation Approaches to Reduce Poverty,” prompted ongoing dialogue culminating in a new statute to increase Earned Income Tax Credit for parents with young children. This approach also has strengthened relationships among researchers and legislators, which serves to streamline the OFIS process. Conclusion This model is an effective vehicle for leveraging public health research findings to inform state-level policy. This model also serves to connect researchers with opportunities to engage with policymakers to address significant public health problems, particularly those addressing social, economic, and environmental determinants of health for children and families.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Abraham, K. G., Haskins, R., Glied, S., Groves, R. M., Hahn, R., Hoynes, H.,… Wallin, K. R. (2017). The Promise of evidence-based policymaking: Report of the commission on evidence-based policymaking. Retrieved 9 September, 2018, from https://www.cep.gov/content/dam/cep/report/cep-final-report.pdf.
Bogenschneider, K. (1995). Roles for professionals in building family policy: A case study of state family impact seminars. Family Relations, National Council on Family Relations, 44(1), 5–12.
Bogenschneider, K. (2000). Has family policy come of age? A decade review of the state of U.S. family policy in the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1136–1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01136.x.
Bogenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. (2010). Evidence-based policymaking: Insights from policy-minded researchers and research-minded policymakers. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Bogenschneider, K., Little, O. M., Ooms, T., Benning, S., & Cadigan, K. (2012a). The family impact handbook: How to view policy & practice through the family impact lens. The Family Impact Institute. Retrieved 9 September 9, 2018, from https://www.purdue.edu/hhs/hdfs/fii/wpcontent/uploads/2015/06/fi_handbook_0712.pdf.
Bogenschneider, K., Little, O. M., Ooms, T., Benning, S., Cadigan, K., & Corbett, T. (2012b). The family impact lens: A family-focused, evidence-informed approach to policy and practice. Family Relations, 61(3), 514–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00704.x.
Brownson, R. C., Chriqui, J. F., & Stamatakis, K. A. (2009). Understanding evidence-based public health policy. American Journal of Public Health, 99(9), 1576–1583. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.156224.
CDC. (2014). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The 10 Essential Public Health Services. Retrieved 21 August, 2018, from https://www.cdc.gov/nphpsp/essentialservices.html .
Farley, T. A. (2016). Asking the right questions: Research of consequence to solve problems of significance. American Journal of Public Health, 106(10), 1778–1779. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303416.
Kellogg Commission. (1999). Returning to our roots: The engaged institution. Third Report. National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. Retrieved 21 August, 2018, from http://www.aplu.org/library/returning-to-our-roots-the-engaged-institution/file .
Mayer, R., & Hutchins, V. L. (1998). District of columbia family policy seminar: A tool for devolution. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2(1), 59–62.
Morshed, A. B., Dodson, E. A., Tabak, R. G., & Brownson, R. C. (2017). Comparison of research framing preferences and information use of state legislators and advocates involved in cancer control, United States, 2012–2013. Preventing Chronic Disease, 14, E10. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd14.160292.
Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: Policy Press.
Wilcox, B. L., Weisz, P. V., & Miller, M. K. (2005). Practical guidelines for educating policymakers: The family impact seminar as an approach to advancing the interests of children and families in the policy arena. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 34(4), 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3404_6.
Wise, D., Brandon, D., & Tucker, A. (2014). Strengthening families: Making the connection to early childhood policy. National Council on Family Relations Report.
This work was funded by the internal operating budget of the Oregon State University Hallie Ford Center for Healthy Children and Families. We gratefully acknowledge all stakeholders in and past participants of the Oregon Family Impact Seminar series.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Tomayko, E.J., Godlewski, B., Bowman, S. et al. Leveraging Public Health Research to Inform State Legislative Policy that Promotes Health for Children and Families. Matern Child Health J 23, 733–738 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-02708-x