Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lessons Learned: Implementation of Pilot Universal Postpartum Nurse Home Visiting Program, Massachusetts 2013–2016

  • From the Field
  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose Home visiting programs for new families in the United States have traditionally served high-risk families. In contrast, universal home visiting models serve all families regardless of income, age, risk or other criteria. They offer an entry point into a system of care for children and families, with the potential to improve population health. This paper describes lessons learned from the first three years of implementing a universal home visiting model. Description Welcome Family is a universal home visiting program in Massachusetts that offers a one-time visit by a nurse to new mothers up to eight weeks postpartum. The Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) is piloting Welcome Family in four communities with the goal of expanding statewide. Assessment Welcome Family served over 3000 families in its first three years. Program performance measures provided a framework to examine successes and challenges related to outreach and enrollment, program operations, and linkages with community resources. Early challenges included increasing referrals to a new program and limited capacity to serve all women giving birth. Local implementing agencies tested innovative strategies and MDPH made program modifications, such as developing quarterly data reports and establishing a learning collaborative, to address identified challenges. Conclusion MDPH is committed to the success of Welcome Family and uses continuous quality improvement to maximize the impact of the program on families and the system of care in Massachusetts. Lessons learned from the Massachusetts pilot can inform other states’ efforts to enhance their early childhood systems of care through expanding universal home visiting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Dodge, K. A., Goodman, B., Murphy, R. A., O’Donnell, K., et al. (2013). Randomized control trial of universal postnatal home visiting: impact on emergency care. Pediatrics, 132(2), S140–S146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., Goodman, B., Murphy, R. A., O’Donnell, K., et al. (2014). Implementation and randomized controlled trial of universal nurse home visiting. American Journal of Public Health, 104(1), S136–S143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A., & Kotelchuck, M. (2010). Rethinking MCH: The life course model as an organizing framework. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.aucd.org/docs/rethinkingmch.pdf. Accessed 22 Apr 2016.

  • Finello, K. M., Terteryan, A., & Riewerts, R. J. (2016). Home visiting programs: what the primary care clinician should know. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 46(4), 101–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geeraert, L., Van den Noortgate, W., Grietens, H., & Onghena, P. (2004). The effects of early prevention programs for families with young children at risk for physical child abuse and neglect: A meta-analysis. Child Maltreatment, 9(3), 277–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guterman, N. B. (1999). Enrollment strategies in early home visitation to prevent physical child abuse and neglect and the ‘Universal versus targeted’ debate: A meta-analysis of population-based and screening-based programs. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(9), 863–890.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, R. D. (1993). Universal Home Visiting: A Recommendation from the U.S. Advisory Board on child abuse and neglect. Future of Children, 3(3), 184–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, M., & Appelbaum, M. (2004). Is home visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children. Child Development, 75(5), 1435–1456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project is supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under the Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting Grant Program. This information or content and conclusions are those of the author and should not be construed as the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS or the U.S. Government. The authors wish to acknowledge the support of Ron Benham, MDiv, Beth Buxton, LCSW, Claudia Catalano, MPP, and Snaltze Pierre, MPH.

Funding

Funding was provided by Maternal and Child Health Bureau (Grant No. X10MC29474).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie Stetler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stetler, K., Silva, C., Manning, S.E. et al. Lessons Learned: Implementation of Pilot Universal Postpartum Nurse Home Visiting Program, Massachusetts 2013–2016. Matern Child Health J 22, 11–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2385-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2385-x

Keywords

Navigation