Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Different Case Ascertainment Definitions on the Prevalence of Major Congenital Malformations and their Association with Asthma During Pregnancy

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives To compare the prevalence of major malformations using different case ascertainment definitions and to evaluate their impact on maternal asthma-major malformations association. Methods A cohort of pregnancies with and without asthma between 1990 and 2010 was formed. We used two classification methods: the Two step Congenital Malformation Classification (TCMC) and the Canadian Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System (CCASS). Within each method, three case definitions were compared: (1) ≥1 diagnosis in the hospital database; (2) ≥1 diagnosis in the hospital database or ≥2 in the medical claims; and (3) ≥1 diagnosis in the hospital database or ≥1 in the medical claims. We calculated the prevalence of major malformations and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for maternal asthma association. Results Of 467,946 pregnancies, 12.3 % were with active asthma. The prevalence estimates were: TCMC 5.10–7.08 % and CCASS 7.03–10.57 %. Asthma-major malformations association was weaker with the CCASS (aOR 1.14–1.20) versus TCMC (aOR 1.22–1.26). Discussion The case ascertainment definitions with ≥1 hospitalization are likely to be the most reliable in similar administrative databases. The case ascertainment definition had a considerable impact on the prevalence of major malformations, but hardly influenced the aORs. Future studies should formally assess the validity of the case ascertainment definitions and allow generalizability to other maternal exposures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bedard, T., Lowry, R. B., & Sibbald, B. (2012). ICD-10 coding for congenital anomalies: a Canadian experience. Journal of registry management, 39(1), 4–7. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23270084

  • Bedard, T., Lowry, R. B., Sibbald, B., Harder, J. R., Trevenen, C., Horobec, V., et al. (2012b). Congenital heart defect case ascertainment by the Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 94(6), 449–458. doi:10.1002/bdra.23007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berard, A., Ramos, E., Rey, E., Blais, L., St-Andre, M., & Oraichi, D. (2007). First trimester exposure to paroxetine and risk of cardiac malformations in infants: the importance of dosage. Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology, 80(1), 18–27. doi:10.1002/bdrb.20099

  • Blais, L., Beauchesne, M. F., Lemiere, C., & Elftouh, N. (2009). High doses of inhaled corticosteroids during the first trimester of pregnancy and congenital malformations. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 124(6), 1229–1234 e1224. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.09.025

  • Blais, L., Berard, A., Kettani, F. Z., & Forget, A. (2013). Validity of congenital malformation diagnostic codes recorded in Quebec’s administrative databases. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 22(8), 881–889. doi:10.1002/pds.3446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blais, L., & Forget, A. (2008). Asthma exacerbations during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations among asthmatic women. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 121(6), 1379–1384, 1384 e1371. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.02.038

  • Blais, L., Kettani, F. Z., Elftouh, N., & Forget, A. (2010). Effect of maternal asthma on the risk of specific congenital malformations: A population-based cohort study. Birth Defects Res Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 88(4), 216–222. doi:10.1002/bdra.20651.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brent, R. L. (2001). Addressing environmentally caused human birth defects. Pediatrics in review/American Academy of Pediatrics, 22(5), 153–165. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11331737

  • Callif-Daley, F. A., Huether, C. A., & Edmonds, L. D. (1995). Evaluating false positives in two hospital discharge data sets of the Birth Defects Monitoring Program. Public health reports, 110(2), 154–160. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7630991

  • Cooper, W. O., Hernandez-Diaz, S., Gideon, P., Dyer, S. M., Hall, K., Dudley, J., et al. (2008). Positive predictive value of computerized records for major congenital malformations. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 17(5), 455–460. doi:10.1002/pds.1534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Correa, A., & Kirby, R. S. (2010). An expanded public health role for birth defects surveillance. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 88(12), 1004–1007. doi:10.1002/bdra.20730.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Wals, P., Rusen, I. D., Lee, N. S., Morin, P., & Niyonsenga, T. (2003). Trend in prevalence of neural tube defects in Quebec. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 67(11), 919–923. doi:10.1002/bdra.10124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eltonsy, S., Forget, A., Beauchesne, M. F., & Blais, L. (2014). Risk of congenital malformations for asthmatic pregnant women using a long-acting beta-agonist and inhaled corticosteroid combination versus higher-dose inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology,. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.051.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gershon, A. S., Wang, C., Guan, J., Vasilevska-Ristovska, J., Cicutto, L., & To, T. (2009). Identifying patients with physician-diagnosed asthma in health administrative databases. Canadian respiratory journal: journal of the Canadian Thoracic Society, 16(6), 183–188. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20011725

  • Gill, S. K., Broussard, C., Devine, O., Green, R. F., Rasmussen, S. A., & Reefhuis, J. (2012). Association between maternal age and birth defects of unknown etiology: United States, 1997–2007. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 94(12), 1010–1018. doi:10.1002/bdra.23049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinonen, O. P., Slone, D., & Shapiro, S. (1977). Birth defects and drugs in pregnancy. Littleton: Publishing Sciences Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, C. A., Hopkins, S. E., & Simmons, C. J. (2001). Sources of variability in birth defects prevalence rates. Teratology, 64(Suppl 1), S8–S13. doi:10.1002/tera.1078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshnood, B., Greenlees, R., Loane, M., Dolk, H., Committee, E. P. M., & Group, E. W. (2011). Paper 2: EUROCAT public health indicators for congenital anomalies in Europe. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 91(Suppl 1), S16–S22. doi:10.1002/bdra.20776.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kulaga, S., & Berard, A. (2010). Congenital malformations: agreement between diagnostic codes in an administrative database and mothers’ reports. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 32(6), 549–554. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20569535

  • Langlois, P. H., Scheuerle, A., Horel, S. A., & Carozza, S. E. (2009). Urban versus rural residence and occurrence of septal heart defects in Texas. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 85(9), 764–772. doi:10.1002/bdra.20586.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Joseph, K. S., Lisonkova, S., Rouleau, J., Van den Hof, M., Sauve, R., et al. (2013). Association between maternal chronic conditions and congenital heart defects: A population-based cohort study. Circulation, 128(6), 583–589. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.112.001054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Messer, L. C., Luben, T. J., Mendola, P., Carozza, S. E., Horel, S. A., & Langlois, P. H. (2010). Urban-rural residence and the occurrence of cleft lip and cleft palate in Texas, 1999–2003. Annals of Epidemiology, 20(1), 32–39. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.09.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, A., Sibbald, B., Lowry, R. B., Tough, S., & Bernier, F. P. (2014). Validation of congenital anomaly coding in Canada’s administrative databases compared with a congenital anomaly registry. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 100(2), 59–66. doi:10.1002/bdra.23206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, V. E., Wang, G., Namazy, J. A., Powell, H., Gibson, P. G., Chambers, C., et al. (2013). The risk of congenital malformations, perinatal mortality and neonatal hospitalisation among pregnant women with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 120(7), 812–822. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Public Health Agency of Canada. Congenital Anomalies in Canada 2013: A Perinatal Health Surveillance Report. Ottawa, 2013. Retrieved from

  • Public Health Agency of Canada. Perinatal Health Indicators for Canada 2013: a Report of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Ottawa, 2013. Retrieved from

  • Rasmussen, S. A., & Moore, C. A. (2001). Effective coding in birth defects surveillance. Teratology, 64(Suppl 1), S3–7. doi:10.1002/tera.1077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern epidemiology (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salemi, J. L., Tanner, J. P., Block, S., Bailey, M., Correia, J. A., Watkins, S. M., & Kirby, R. S. (2011). The relative contribution of data sources to a birth defects registry utilizing passive multisource ascertainment methods: does a smaller birth defects case ascertainment net lead to overall or disproportionate loss? Journal of registry management, 38(1), 30–38. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22097703

  • Statistics Canada-Components of population growth, Canada, provinces and territories. Retrieved from http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&retrLang=eng&id=0510004&paSer=&pattern=&stByVal=1&p1=1&p2=37&tabMode=dataTable&csid

  • Tairou, F., De Wals, P., & Bastide, A. (2006). Validity of death and stillbirth certificates and hospital discharge summaries for the identification of neural tube defects in Quebec City. Chronic diseases in Canada, 27(3), 120–124. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17306063

  • Yang, J., Carmichael, S. L., Canfield, M., Song, J., & Shaw, G. M. (2008). Socioeconomic status in relation to selected birth defects in a large multicentered US case-control study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167(2), 145–154. doi:10.1093/aje/kwm283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeger, S. L., Liang, K. Y., & Albert, P. S. (1988). Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics, 44(4), 1049–1060. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3233245

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Grant Number: MOP-97731. We are grateful to the Commission d’accès à l’information du Québec for authorising the study and to the Régie de l’assurance-mladie du Québec for providing the data.

Financial Diclosure

L. Blais reports grants from CIHR during the conduct of the study; S.Eltonsy is the recipient of The Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQS) doctoral grant. A.Forget has nothing to disclose. This study was funded the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, grant number: MOP-97731.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucie Blais.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Statement

This research project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal. Authorization was obtained from the Commission d’Accès à l’Information du Québec to access and link the RAMQ and MED-ECHO databases.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 317 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PDF 159 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eltonsy, S., Forget, A. & Blais, L. The Impact of Different Case Ascertainment Definitions on the Prevalence of Major Congenital Malformations and their Association with Asthma During Pregnancy. Matern Child Health J 21, 616–625 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2147-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2147-1

Keywords

Navigation