Abstract
Objectives To compare the prevalence of major malformations using different case ascertainment definitions and to evaluate their impact on maternal asthma-major malformations association. Methods A cohort of pregnancies with and without asthma between 1990 and 2010 was formed. We used two classification methods: the Two step Congenital Malformation Classification (TCMC) and the Canadian Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System (CCASS). Within each method, three case definitions were compared: (1) ≥1 diagnosis in the hospital database; (2) ≥1 diagnosis in the hospital database or ≥2 in the medical claims; and (3) ≥1 diagnosis in the hospital database or ≥1 in the medical claims. We calculated the prevalence of major malformations and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for maternal asthma association. Results Of 467,946 pregnancies, 12.3 % were with active asthma. The prevalence estimates were: TCMC 5.10–7.08 % and CCASS 7.03–10.57 %. Asthma-major malformations association was weaker with the CCASS (aOR 1.14–1.20) versus TCMC (aOR 1.22–1.26). Discussion The case ascertainment definitions with ≥1 hospitalization are likely to be the most reliable in similar administrative databases. The case ascertainment definition had a considerable impact on the prevalence of major malformations, but hardly influenced the aORs. Future studies should formally assess the validity of the case ascertainment definitions and allow generalizability to other maternal exposures.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bedard, T., Lowry, R. B., & Sibbald, B. (2012). ICD-10 coding for congenital anomalies: a Canadian experience. Journal of registry management, 39(1), 4–7. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23270084
Bedard, T., Lowry, R. B., Sibbald, B., Harder, J. R., Trevenen, C., Horobec, V., et al. (2012b). Congenital heart defect case ascertainment by the Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 94(6), 449–458. doi:10.1002/bdra.23007.
Berard, A., Ramos, E., Rey, E., Blais, L., St-Andre, M., & Oraichi, D. (2007). First trimester exposure to paroxetine and risk of cardiac malformations in infants: the importance of dosage. Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology, 80(1), 18–27. doi:10.1002/bdrb.20099
Blais, L., Beauchesne, M. F., Lemiere, C., & Elftouh, N. (2009). High doses of inhaled corticosteroids during the first trimester of pregnancy and congenital malformations. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 124(6), 1229–1234 e1224. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.09.025
Blais, L., Berard, A., Kettani, F. Z., & Forget, A. (2013). Validity of congenital malformation diagnostic codes recorded in Quebec’s administrative databases. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 22(8), 881–889. doi:10.1002/pds.3446.
Blais, L., & Forget, A. (2008). Asthma exacerbations during the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations among asthmatic women. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 121(6), 1379–1384, 1384 e1371. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.02.038
Blais, L., Kettani, F. Z., Elftouh, N., & Forget, A. (2010). Effect of maternal asthma on the risk of specific congenital malformations: A population-based cohort study. Birth Defects Res Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 88(4), 216–222. doi:10.1002/bdra.20651.
Brent, R. L. (2001). Addressing environmentally caused human birth defects. Pediatrics in review/American Academy of Pediatrics, 22(5), 153–165. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11331737
Callif-Daley, F. A., Huether, C. A., & Edmonds, L. D. (1995). Evaluating false positives in two hospital discharge data sets of the Birth Defects Monitoring Program. Public health reports, 110(2), 154–160. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7630991
Cooper, W. O., Hernandez-Diaz, S., Gideon, P., Dyer, S. M., Hall, K., Dudley, J., et al. (2008). Positive predictive value of computerized records for major congenital malformations. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 17(5), 455–460. doi:10.1002/pds.1534.
Correa, A., & Kirby, R. S. (2010). An expanded public health role for birth defects surveillance. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 88(12), 1004–1007. doi:10.1002/bdra.20730.
De Wals, P., Rusen, I. D., Lee, N. S., Morin, P., & Niyonsenga, T. (2003). Trend in prevalence of neural tube defects in Quebec. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 67(11), 919–923. doi:10.1002/bdra.10124.
Eltonsy, S., Forget, A., Beauchesne, M. F., & Blais, L. (2014). Risk of congenital malformations for asthmatic pregnant women using a long-acting beta-agonist and inhaled corticosteroid combination versus higher-dose inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology,. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.051.
Gershon, A. S., Wang, C., Guan, J., Vasilevska-Ristovska, J., Cicutto, L., & To, T. (2009). Identifying patients with physician-diagnosed asthma in health administrative databases. Canadian respiratory journal: journal of the Canadian Thoracic Society, 16(6), 183–188. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20011725
Gill, S. K., Broussard, C., Devine, O., Green, R. F., Rasmussen, S. A., & Reefhuis, J. (2012). Association between maternal age and birth defects of unknown etiology: United States, 1997–2007. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 94(12), 1010–1018. doi:10.1002/bdra.23049.
Heinonen, O. P., Slone, D., & Shapiro, S. (1977). Birth defects and drugs in pregnancy. Littleton: Publishing Sciences Group.
Hobbs, C. A., Hopkins, S. E., & Simmons, C. J. (2001). Sources of variability in birth defects prevalence rates. Teratology, 64(Suppl 1), S8–S13. doi:10.1002/tera.1078.
Khoshnood, B., Greenlees, R., Loane, M., Dolk, H., Committee, E. P. M., & Group, E. W. (2011). Paper 2: EUROCAT public health indicators for congenital anomalies in Europe. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 91(Suppl 1), S16–S22. doi:10.1002/bdra.20776.
Kulaga, S., & Berard, A. (2010). Congenital malformations: agreement between diagnostic codes in an administrative database and mothers’ reports. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 32(6), 549–554. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20569535
Langlois, P. H., Scheuerle, A., Horel, S. A., & Carozza, S. E. (2009). Urban versus rural residence and occurrence of septal heart defects in Texas. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 85(9), 764–772. doi:10.1002/bdra.20586.
Liu, S., Joseph, K. S., Lisonkova, S., Rouleau, J., Van den Hof, M., Sauve, R., et al. (2013). Association between maternal chronic conditions and congenital heart defects: A population-based cohort study. Circulation, 128(6), 583–589. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.112.001054.
Messer, L. C., Luben, T. J., Mendola, P., Carozza, S. E., Horel, S. A., & Langlois, P. H. (2010). Urban-rural residence and the occurrence of cleft lip and cleft palate in Texas, 1999–2003. Annals of Epidemiology, 20(1), 32–39. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.09.006.
Metcalfe, A., Sibbald, B., Lowry, R. B., Tough, S., & Bernier, F. P. (2014). Validation of congenital anomaly coding in Canada’s administrative databases compared with a congenital anomaly registry. Birth Defects Research Part A Clinical Molecular Teratology, 100(2), 59–66. doi:10.1002/bdra.23206.
Murphy, V. E., Wang, G., Namazy, J. A., Powell, H., Gibson, P. G., Chambers, C., et al. (2013). The risk of congenital malformations, perinatal mortality and neonatal hospitalisation among pregnant women with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 120(7), 812–822. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12224.
Public Health Agency of Canada. Congenital Anomalies in Canada 2013: A Perinatal Health Surveillance Report. Ottawa, 2013. Retrieved from
Public Health Agency of Canada. Perinatal Health Indicators for Canada 2013: a Report of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Ottawa, 2013. Retrieved from
Rasmussen, S. A., & Moore, C. A. (2001). Effective coding in birth defects surveillance. Teratology, 64(Suppl 1), S3–7. doi:10.1002/tera.1077.
Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern epidemiology (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Salemi, J. L., Tanner, J. P., Block, S., Bailey, M., Correia, J. A., Watkins, S. M., & Kirby, R. S. (2011). The relative contribution of data sources to a birth defects registry utilizing passive multisource ascertainment methods: does a smaller birth defects case ascertainment net lead to overall or disproportionate loss? Journal of registry management, 38(1), 30–38. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22097703
Statistics Canada-Components of population growth, Canada, provinces and territories. Retrieved from http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&retrLang=eng&id=0510004&paSer=&pattern=&stByVal=1&p1=1&p2=37&tabMode=dataTable&csid
Tairou, F., De Wals, P., & Bastide, A. (2006). Validity of death and stillbirth certificates and hospital discharge summaries for the identification of neural tube defects in Quebec City. Chronic diseases in Canada, 27(3), 120–124. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17306063
Yang, J., Carmichael, S. L., Canfield, M., Song, J., & Shaw, G. M. (2008). Socioeconomic status in relation to selected birth defects in a large multicentered US case-control study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167(2), 145–154. doi:10.1093/aje/kwm283.
Zeger, S. L., Liang, K. Y., & Albert, P. S. (1988). Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics, 44(4), 1049–1060. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3233245
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Grant Number: MOP-97731. We are grateful to the Commission d’accès à l’information du Québec for authorising the study and to the Régie de l’assurance-mladie du Québec for providing the data.
Financial Diclosure
L. Blais reports grants from CIHR during the conduct of the study; S.Eltonsy is the recipient of The Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQS) doctoral grant. A.Forget has nothing to disclose. This study was funded the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, grant number: MOP-97731.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical Statement
This research project was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal. Authorization was obtained from the Commission d’Accès à l’Information du Québec to access and link the RAMQ and MED-ECHO databases.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eltonsy, S., Forget, A. & Blais, L. The Impact of Different Case Ascertainment Definitions on the Prevalence of Major Congenital Malformations and their Association with Asthma During Pregnancy. Matern Child Health J 21, 616–625 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2147-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2147-1