Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 20, Issue 10, pp 2003–2011 | Cite as

The Obstetric Hemorrhage Initiative (OHI) in Florida: The Role of Intervention Characteristics in Influencing Implementation Experiences among Multidisciplinary Hospital Staff

  • Cheryl A. VamosEmail author
  • Allison Cantor
  • Erika L. Thompson
  • Linda A. Detman
  • Emily A. Bronson
  • Annette Phelps
  • Judette M. Louis
  • Anthony R. Gregg
  • John S. Curran
  • William M. Sappenfield


Objectives Obstetric hemorrhage is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. The Florida Perinatal Quality Collaborative coordinates a state-wide Obstetric Hemorrhage Initiative (OHI) to assist hospitals in implementing best practices related to this preventable condition. This study examined intervention characteristics that influenced the OHI implementation experiences among Florida hospitals. Methods Purposive sampling was employed to recruit diverse hospitals and multidisciplinary staff members. A semi-structured interview guide was developed based on the following constructs from the intervention characteristics domain of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: evidence strength; complexity; adaptability; and packaging. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using Atlas.ti. Results Participants (n = 50) across 12 hospitals agreed that OHI is evidence-based and supported by various information sources (scientific literature, experience, and other epidemiologic or quality improvement data). Participants believed the OHI was ‘average’ in complexity, with variation depending on participant’s role and intervention component. Participants discussed how the OHI is flexible and can be easily adapted and integrated into different hospital settings, policies and resources. The packaging was also found to be valuable in providing materials and supports (e.g., toolkit; webinars; forms; technical assistance) that assisted implementation across activities. Conclusions for Practice Participants reflected positively with regards to the evidence strength, adaptability, and packaging of the OHI. However, the complexity of the initiative adversely affected implementation experiences and required additional efforts to maximize the initiative effectiveness. Findings will inform future efforts to facilitate implementation experiences of evidence-based practices for hemorrhage prevention, ultimately decreasing maternal morbidity and mortality.


Obstetric hemorrhage Quality improvement Implementation Evaluation Qualitative 



This project was supported by funds from the Florida Department of Health. We would like to thank all of the hospitals and multidisciplinary staff members who participated in this study for their time and willingness to share their candid experiences implementing this quality improvement initiative.


  1. 1.
    Andreatta, P., & Marzano, D. (2012). Healthcare management strategies: Interdisciplinary team factors. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 24(6), 445–452. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328359f007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armstrong, C. E., Lange, I. L., Magoma, M., Ferla, C., Filippi, V., & Ronsmans, C. (2014). Strengths and weaknesses in the implementation of maternal and perinatal death reviews in Tanzania: Perceptions, processes and practice. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 19(9), 1087–1095. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12353.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belizan, J. M., Salaria, N., Valanzasca, P., & Mbizvo, M. (2014). How can we improve the use of essential evidence-based interventions? Reproductive Health, 11, 69. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bingham, D., & Jones, R. (2012). Maternal death from obstetric hemorrhage. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 41(4), 531–539. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01372.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bingham, D., Lyndon, A., Lagrew, D., & Main, E. K. (2011). A state-wide obstetric hemorrhage quality improvement initiative. MCN The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 36(5), 297–304. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0b013e318227c75f.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Coding Analysis Toolkit. (2007–2015). Qualitative data analysis program. University Center for Social and Urban Research, University of Pittsburgh, Qualitative Data Analysis Program, College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst. Retrieved July 26, 2015 from
  7. 7.
    Creanga, A. A., Berg, C. J., Syverson, C., Seed, K., Bruce, F. C., & Callaghan, W. M. (2015). Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2006–2010. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 125(1), 5–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Damschroder, L. J., & Hagedorn, H. J. (2011). A guiding framework and approach for implementation research in substance use disorders treatment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25(2), 194–205. doi: 10.1037/a0022284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Florida Perinatal Quality Collaborative. (2014). Florida obstetric hemorrhage initiative toolkit: A quality improvement initiative for obstetric hemorrhage management.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hartzler, B., Lash, S. J., & Roll, J. M. (2012). Contingency management in substance abuse treatment: A structured review of the evidence for its transportability. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 122(1–2), 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.11.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kennedy, C., Finkelstein, N., Hutchins, E., & Mahoney, J. (2004). Improving screening for alcohol use during pregnancy: The Massachusetts ASAP program. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 8(3), 137–147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lash, S. J., Timko, C., Curran, G. M., McKay, J. R., & Burden, J. L. (2011). Implementation of evidence-based substance use disorder continuing care interventions. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25(2), 238–251. doi: 10.1037/a0022608.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, H. C., Powers, R. J., Bennett, M. V., Finer, N. N., Halamek, L. P., Nisbet, C., & Sharek, P. J. (2014). Implementation methods for delivery room management: A quality improvement comparison study. Pediatrics, 134(5), e1378–e1386. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0863.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levison, J., Williams, L. T., Moore, A., McFarlane, J., & Davila, J. A. (2011). Increasing use of rapid HIV testing in labor and delivery among women with no prenatal care: A local initiative. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15(6), 822–826. doi: 10.1007/s10995-010-0636-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia medica (Zagreb), 22(3), 276–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morris, Z. S., Wooding, S., & Grant, J. (2011). The answer is 17 years, what is the question: Understanding time lags in translational research. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104(12), 510–520. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nikolopoulos, H., Farmer, A., Berry, T. R., McCargar, L. J., & Mager, D. R. (2015). Perceptions of the characteristics of the Alberta Nutrition Guidelines for Children and Youth by child care providers may influence early adoption of nutrition guidelines in child care centres. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 11(2), 271–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00460.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Porter, K. J. (2013). Bringing nutrition education programs from outside sources into the classroom: The experience of New York City public elementary schools. (PhD), Columbia University, New York. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text database database.
  20. 20.
    Rabin, B. A., Brownson, R. C., Haire-Joshu, D., Kreuter, M. W., & Weaver, N. L. (2008). A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 14(2), 117–123. doi: 10.1097/ Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robins, L. S., Jackson, J. E., Green, B. B., Korngiebel, D., Force, R. W., & Baldwin, L. M. (2013). Barriers and facilitators to evidence-based blood pressure control in community practice. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 26(5), 539–557. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.130060.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ryan, R. W., Harris, K. K., Mattox, L., Singh, O., Camp, M., & Shirey, M. R. (2015). Nursing leader collaboration to drive quality improvement and implementation science. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 229–238. doi: 10.1097/naq.0000000000000111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Segre, L. S., Brock, R. L., O’Hara, M. W., Gorman, L. L., & Engeldinger, J. (2011). Disseminating perinatal depression screening as a public health initiative: A train-the-trainer approach. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15(6), 814–821. doi: 10.1007/s10995-010-0644-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Serruya, S. J., Duran, P., Martinez, G., Romero, M., Caffe, S., Alonso, M., & Silveira, M. F. (2015). Maternal and congenital syphilis in selected Latin America and Caribbean countries: A multi-country analysis using data from the Perinatal Information System. Sexual Health. doi: 10.1071/sh14191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shah, V., Warre, R., & Lee, S. K. (2013). Quality improvement initiatives in neonatal intensive care unit networks: Achievements and challenges. Academic Pediatric, 13(6 Suppl), S75–S83. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sorensen, J. L., & Kosten, T. (2011). Developing the tools of implementation science in substance use disorders treatment: Applications of the consolidated framework for implementation research. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25(2), 262–268. doi: 10.1037/a0022765.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheryl A. Vamos
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Allison Cantor
    • 1
  • Erika L. Thompson
    • 1
    • 2
  • Linda A. Detman
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Emily A. Bronson
    • 2
    • 3
  • Annette Phelps
    • 3
  • Judette M. Louis
    • 3
    • 4
  • Anthony R. Gregg
    • 5
  • John S. Curran
    • 3
    • 6
  • William M. Sappenfield
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public HealthUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.The Chiles Center, College of Public HealthUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  3. 3.Florida Perinatal Quality CollaborativeThe Chiles Center, College of Public Health, University of South FloridaTampaUSA
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morsani College of MedicineUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  5. 5.Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  6. 6.Faculty and Academic Affairs, USF Health, Morsani College of MedicineUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations