Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 20, Issue 8, pp 1735–1744

WIC Participation and Breastfeeding at 3 Months Postpartum

  • Emily F. Gregory
  • Susan M. Gross
  • Trang Q. Nguyen
  • Arlene M. Butz
  • Sara B. Johnson
Article

Abstract

Objectives Participation in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) has been associated with lower breastfeeding initiation and duration. This study examines breastfeeding-related factors among WIC participants and nonparticipants that might explain these previous findings. Methods Respondents to the 2007 Infant Feeding Practices Study II who were income-eligible for WIC were categorized as follows: no WIC participation (No-WIC); prenatal participation and infant entry while ≥60 % breastfeeding (WIC BF-high); prenatal participation and infant entry while <60 % breastfeeding (WIC BF-low). Percent breastfeeding was the number of breast milk feeds divided by the total number of liquid feeds. Using propensity scores, we matched WIC BF-high respondents to No-WIC respondents on demographic and breastfeeding factors. We used logistic regression to estimate the impact of WIC participation on breastfeeding at 3 months postpartum in the matched sample. Within-WIC differences were explored. Results Of 743 income-eligible respondents, 293 never enrolled in WIC, 230 were categorized as WIC BF-high, and 220 as WIC BF-low. Compared to matched No-WIC respondents, WIC BF-high respondents had increased odds of breastfeeding at 3 months, though this difference was not statistically significant (OR 1.92; 95 % CI 0.95–3.67; p value 0.07). WIC BF-high respondents were more similar on breastfeeding-related characteristics to No-WIC respondents than to WIC BF-low respondents. Conclusions for Practice Accounting for prenatal breastfeeding intentions and attitudes, we find no negative association between WIC participation and breastfeeding at 3 months postpartum. This is in contrast to prior studies, and highlights the importance of understanding within-WIC differences.

Keywords

Breastfeeding WIC Health promotion Low-income women 

References

  1. 1.
    Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1998). Survival probabilities (the kaplan-meier method). BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 317(7172), 1572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burnham, L., Buczek, M., Braun, N., Feldman-Winter, L., Chen, N., & Merewood, A. (2014). Determining length of breastfeeding exclusivity: Validity of maternal report 2 years after birth. Journal of Human Lactation, 30(2), 190–194. doi:10.1177/0890334414525682.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Couper, M. P. (2011). The future of modes of data collection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5), 889–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cricco-Lizza, R. (2005). The milk of human kindness: Environmental and human interactions in a WIC clinic that influence infant-feeding decisions of black women. Qualitative Health Research, 15(4), 525–538.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Currie, J. (2006). The take-up of social benefits. In A. Auerbach, D. Card, & J. Quigley (Eds.), Public policy and the income distribution (p. 80). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fein, S. B., Labiner-Wolfe, J., Shealy, K. R., Li, R., Chen, J., & Grummer-Strawn, L. M. (2008). Infant feeding practices study II: Study methods. Pediatrics, 122(Suppl 2), S28–S35. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-1315c.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fishbein, M., & Cappella, J. N. (2006). The role of theory in developing effective health communications. Journal of Communication, 56(s1), S1–S17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fishbein, M. (2000). The role of theory in HIV prevention. AIDS Care, 12(3), 273–278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flaherman, V. J., Chien, A. T., McCulloch, C. E., & Dudley, R. A. (2011). Breastfeeding rates differ significantly by method used: A cause for concern for public health measurement. Breastfeeding Medicine, 6(1), 31–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gross, S. M., Resnik, A. K., Nanda, J. P., Cross-Barnet, C., Augustyn, M., Kelly, L., & Paige, D. M. (2011). Early postpartum: A critical period in setting the path for breastfeeding success. Breastfeeding Medicine, 6(6), 407–412.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hauff, L. E., Leonard, S. A., & Rasmussen, K. M. (2014). Associations of maternal obesity and psychosocial factors with breastfeeding intention, initiation, and duration. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 99(3), 524–534. doi:10.3945/ajcn.113.071191.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ip, S., Chung, M., Raman, G., Chew, P., Magula, N., DeVine, D., et al. (2007). Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, 153, 1–186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jensen, E. (2012). Participation in the supplemental nutrition program for women, infants and children (WIC) and breastfeeding: National, regional, and state level analyses. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 16(3), 624–631.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jiang, M., Foster, E. M., & Gibson-Davis, C. M. (2010). The effect of WIC on breastfeeding: A new look at an established relationship. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(2), 264–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Joyce, T., Gibson, D., & Colman, S. (2005). The changing association between prenatal participation in WIC and birth outcomes in new york city. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(4), 661–685.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaiser, L. (2008). Why do low-income women not use food stamps? Findings from the california women’s health survey. Public Health Nutrition, 11(12), 1288–1295.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Langellier, B. A., Chaparro, M. P., Wang, M. C., Koleilat, M., & Whaley, S. E. (2014). The new food package and breastfeeding outcomes among women, infants, and children participants in los angeles county. American Journal of Public Health, 104(S1), S112–S118.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lumley, T. (2004). Analysis of complex survey samples. Journal of Statistical Software, 9(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin-Anderson, S. (2013). Prenatal attitudes and parity predict selection into a US child health program: A short report. Social Science and Medicine, 95, 128–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Metallinos-Katsaras, E., Brown, L., & Colchamiro, R. (2015). Maternal WIC participation improves breastfeeding rates: A statewide analysis of WIC participants. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 19(1), 136–143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mitra, R., & Reiter, J. P. (2016). A comparison of two methods of estimating propensity scores after multiple imputation. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 25(1), 188–204. doi:10.1177/0962280212445945.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Raghunathan, T. E., Lepkowski, J. M., Van Hoewyk, J., & Solenberger, P. (2001). A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodology, 27(1), 85–96.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosenberg, T. J., Alperen, J. K., & Chiasson, M. A. (2003). Why do WIC participants fail to pick up their checks? An urban study in the wake of welfare reform. American Journal of Public Health, 93(3), 477–481.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rossin-Slater, M. (2013). WIC in your neighborhood: New evidence on the impacts of geographic access to clinics. Journal of Public Economics, 102, 51–69.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ryan, A. S., & Zhou, W. (2006). Lower breastfeeding rates persist among the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children participants, 1978–2003. Pediatrics, 117(4), 1136–1146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shafai, T., Mustafa, M., & Hild, T. (2014). Promotion of exclusive breastfeeding in low-income families by improving the WIC food package for breastfeeding mothers. Breastfeeding Medicine, 9(8), 375–376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    StataCorp. (2011). Stata statistical software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science : A Review Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 25(1), 1–21. doi:10.1214/09-STS313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2011). The surgeon general’s call to action to support breastfeeding. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    United States Department of Agriculture. (2014a). Monthly data—state level participation by category and program costs: 2013. http://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/wic-program.
  32. 32.
    United States Department of Agriculture. (2014b). Special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants and children (WIC): Revisions in the WIC food packages; final rule. Federal Register, 79(42), 12273.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    USDA/FNS Supplemental Food Programs Division. (2014). WIC breastfeeding data local agency report: 2013. http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/wic/FY-2013-Breastfeeding-Data-Local-Agency-Report.pdf.
  34. 34.
    Wilde, P., Wolf, A., Fernandes, M., & Collins, A. (2012). Food-package assignments and breastfeeding initiation before and after a change in the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 96(3), 560–566. doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.037622.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zubizarreta, J. R., Cerda, M., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (2013). Effect of the 2010 Chilean earthquake on posttraumatic stress: Reducing sensitivity to unmeasured bias through study design. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 24(1), 79–87. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e318277367e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily F. Gregory
    • 1
    • 4
  • Susan M. Gross
    • 2
  • Trang Q. Nguyen
    • 3
  • Arlene M. Butz
    • 1
  • Sara B. Johnson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.General Pediatrics and Adolescent MedicineJohns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of Population, Family and Reproductive HealthJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mental HealthJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.Children’s Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations