Skip to main content

Variation in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean by Maternal Race and Detailed Ethnicity

Maternal and Child Health Journal volume 20, pages 1114–1123 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective Our objective was to examine the likelihood of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) for women in Massachusetts. Methods We used birth certificate data among term, singleton, vertex presentation births by repeat cesarean or VBAC to conduct logistic regression models to examine the likelihood of VBAC for women categorized into standard classifications of race and ethnicity and into 31 detailed ethnicities. Data were analyzed for the entire study period (1996–2010, N = 119,752) and for the last 5 years (2006–2010, N = 46,081). Results The adjusted odds of VBAC were lowest for non-Hispanic Black mothers (0.91, CI [0.85, 0.98]) and highest for Asian/Pacific Islander mothers (1.41, CI [1.31, 1.53]) relative to non-Hispanic White women. VBAC rates ranged from 5.8 % among Brazilians to 29.3 % among Cambodians. The adjusted odds of VBAC were lower for 7 of the 30 ethnic groups (range of AORs 0.40–0.89) and higher for 8 of the 30 ethnic groups (range of AORs 1.18–2.11) relative to self-identified American mothers. For the last 5 years, Asian/Pacific Islander mothers had a higher adjusted VBAC rate (1.39, CI [1.21, 1.60]), as did 9 of the 30 ethnic groups (range of 1.25–1.84). Only Brazilian mothers had lower rates (0.37, CI [0.27, 0.50]), relative to self-identified American mothers. Conclusions Detailed maternal ethnicity explains the variation in VBAC rates more precisely than broad race/ethnicity categories. Improvements in our public health data infrastructure to capture detailed ethnicity are recommended to identify and address disparities and improve the quality of maternity care.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Macdorman, M. F., Menacker, F., & Declercq, E. (2008). Cesarean birth in the United States: Epidemiology, trends, and outcomes. Clinics in Perinatology, 35(2), 293–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. MacDorman, M., Declercq, E., & Menacker, F. (2011). Recent trends and patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States. Delivery After Previous Cesarean, 38(2), 179–192. doi:10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2010). Healthy People 2020. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/about/new2020.aspx. Accessed 21 April 2011.

  4. Lavin, J. P., Stephens, R. J., Miodovnik, M., et al. (1982). Vaginal delivery in patients with a prior cesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 59(2), 135–148.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Flamm, B., Newman, L. A., Thomas, S. J., et al. (1990). Vaginal birth after cesaeran delivery: Results of a 5 year multicenter collaborative study. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 76, 750–754.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, D. A., Diaz, F. G., & Paul, R. H. (1994). Vaginal birth after cesarean: A 10-year experience. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 84(2), 255–258.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Knight, H., Gurol-Urganci, I., van der Meulen, J., et al. (2014). Vaginal birth after cesarean section: A cohort study investigating factors associated with its uptake and success. BJOG, 121, 183–193.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guise, J. M., Eden, K. B., Emeis, C., et al. (2010). Vaginal birth after cesarean: New insights. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No 191. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grobman, W. A. (2010). Rates and prediction of successful vaginal birth after cesarean. Seminars in Perinatology, 34(4), 244–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2012). Inpatient quality indicators #22: technical specifications. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) delivery rate, uncomplicated [version 4.4] (p. 2). Rockville, MD

  12. Bryant, A. S., Worjoloh, A., Caughey, A. B., et al. (2010). Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: Prevalence and determinants. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 202(4), 335–343. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.864.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hawkins, S. S., Torres, B., May, G. S., et al. (2011). Setting the standards for collecting ethnicity data in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 17(6), 550–553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Comstock, R., Castillo, E., & Lidsay, S. (2004). Four-year review of the use of race and ethnicity in epidemiologic and public health research. American Journal Epidemiology, 159(6), 611–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Edmonds, J. K., Hawkins, S. S., & Cohen, B. B. (2014). The influence of detailed maternal ethnicity on cesarean delivery: Findings from the US birth certificate in the State of Massachusetts. Birth, 41(3), 290–298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Roberts, C. L., Bell, J. S., Ford, J. B., et al. (2008). Monitoring the quality of maternity care: How well are labour and delivery events reported in population health data? Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 23(2), 144–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. DiGiuseppe, D. L., Aron, D. C., Ranbom, L., et al. (2002). Reliability of birth certificate data: A multi-hospital comparison to medical records information. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 6(3), 169–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Massachusetts Department of Public Health. (2012). Massachusetts Births 2010. Boston, MA: Division of Research and Epidemiology Bureau of Health Information, Statistics, Research, and Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kotelchuck, M. (1994). The adequacy of prenatal care utilization index: Its US distribution and association with low birthweight. American Journal of Public Health, 84(9), 1486–1489.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Srinivas, S. K., Stamilio, D. M., Sammel, M. D., et al. (2007). Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: Does maternal age affect safety and success? Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 21(2), 114–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Caceres, I. A., Arcaya, M., Decleraq, E., et al. (2013). Hospital differences in cesarean deliveries in Massachusettes (US) 2004–2006: The case against case-mix artifact. PLoS One, 8(3), e57817.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. (1999). ACOG practice bulletin. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Number 5, July 1999. International Journal Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 66(2), 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grobman, W. A., Lai, Y., Landon, M. B., et al. (2011). The change in the VBAC rate: An epidemiologic analysis. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 25(1), 37–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Yeh, J., Wactawski-Wende, J., Shelton, J. A., et al. (2006). Temporal trends in the rates of trial of labor in low-risk pregnancies and their impact on the rates and success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 194(1), 144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin, S. S., & Kelsey, J. L. (2000). Use of race and ethnicity in epidemiologic research: Concepts, methodological issues, and suggestions for research. Epidemiological Review, 22(2), 187–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McMahon, M., Luther, E., Bowes, W., et al. (1996). Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second Cesarean section. New England Journal of Medicine, 335, 689–695.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Massachusetts Department of Public Health. (2014). Massachusetts Births 2011 and 2012. Boston, MA: Office of Data Management and Outcomes Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  28. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. (2010). ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 116(2 Pt 1), 450.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hunt, L. M., & Megyesi, M. S. (2008). The ambiguous meanings of the racial/ethnic categories routinely used in human genetics research. Social Science and Medicine, 66(2), 349–361.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Owen, C. M., Goldstein, E. H., Clayton, J. A., et al. (2013). Racial and ethnic health disparities in reproductive medicine: An evidence-based overview. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 31(5), 317–324.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lewallen, L. P. (2011). The importance of culture in childrearing. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 40(1), 4–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Helsel, D., Petitti, D. B., & Kunstadter, P. (1992). Pregnancy among the Hmong: Birthweight, age, and parity. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 1361–1364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Leeman, L., & Leeman, R. (2003). A Native American community with a 7 % cesarean delivery rate: Does case mix, ethnicity, or labor management explain the low rate? The Annals of Family Medicine, 1(1), 36–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Walker, R., Turnbull, D., & Wilkinson, C. (2004). Increasing cesarean section rates: Exploring the role of culture in an Australian community. Birth, 31(2), 117–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zlot, A., Jackson, D., & Korenbrot, C. (2005). Association of acculturation with cesarean section among Latinos. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 9(1), 11–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gamble, J., Creedy, D. K., McCourt, C., et al. (2007). A critique of the literature on women’s request for cesarean section. Birth-Issues in Perinatal Care, 34(4), 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Callister, L. C., Khalaf, I., Semenic, S., et al. (2003). The pain of childbirth: Perceptions of culturally diverse women. Pain Management Nursing, 4(4), 145–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Eden, K. B., Hashima, J. N., Osterweil, P., et al. (2004). Childbirth preferences after cesarean birth: A review of the evidence. Birth., 31(1), 49–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Essén, B., Binder, P., & Johnsdotter, S. (2011). An anthropological analysis of the perspectives of Somali women in the West and their obstetric care providers on caesarean birth. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 32(1), 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Guo, S., Munshi, D., Cockburn-Wootten, C., et al. (2014). Cultural dilemmas of choice: Deconstructing consumer choice in health communication between maternity-care providers and ethnic Chinese mothers in New Zealand. Health Communication, 29(10), 1020–1028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R00HD068506 to SSH. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funder did not have any role in the study design; in the collection analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Boston College School of Nursing, Maloney Hall 358, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA

    Joyce K. Edmonds

  2. Boston College School of Social Work, McGuinn Hall 210, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA

    Summer Sherburne Hawkins

  3. Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    Bruce B. Cohen

Authors
  1. Joyce K. Edmonds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Summer Sherburne Hawkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bruce B. Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joyce K. Edmonds.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Edmonds, J.K., Hawkins, S.S. & Cohen, B.B. Variation in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean by Maternal Race and Detailed Ethnicity. Matern Child Health J 20, 1114–1123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1897-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-015-1897-5

Keywords

  • Vaginal birth after cesarean
  • VBAC
  • Race/ethnicity
  • Disparity
  • Variation