Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 1293–1299 | Cite as

Comparison of Prospective and Retrospective Measurements of Frequency of Sexual Intercourse

  • Larissa R. Brunner HuberEmail author
  • Jordan E. Lyerly
  • Ashley M. Young
  • Jacek Dmochowski
  • Tara M. Vick
  • Delia Scholes
Methodological Notes


Measurements of sexual intercourse frequency are informative for research on pregnancy, contraception, and the transmission of sexually transmitted infections; however, efficiently collecting data on this sensitive topic is complex. The purpose of this study was to determine whether retrospective recall of sexual intercourse frequency was consistent with information obtained through the use of prospective daily diary methods corresponding to the same time period in a diverse sample of women. A total of 185 women participated in a longitudinal, prospective cohort study of oral contraceptive users and 98 of these women provided complete information on sexual intercourse frequency on diaries (prospective) and postcards (retrospective). Linear mixed models were used to test for variation in response within categories of demographic and other variables. The mean number of days women had sexual intercourse per week was 1.5 days using prospective diary information versus 2.0 days when using 3-month retrospective recall (p < 0.001). Mean differences for the various sociodemographic subgroups were positive for all groups indicating that women consistently reported a higher frequency of sexual intercourse on the retrospective postcards than they recorded on their prospective diaries; however, these mean differences did not vary significantly. If confirmed in other samples, the use of retrospective methods may be adequate to accurately collect data on sexual intercourse frequency—and may be preferable. Using only retrospective measurements could decrease study costs, the burden to participants, and have a higher response rate.


Measurement of sexual intercourse Sexual behavior Coitus Reproducibility of results 



This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant 1R21HD056173-01A2. We thank the Fertility and Oral Contraceptive Use Study (FOCUS) research staff for their assistance with this project.


  1. 1.
    Hornsby, P. P., & Wilcox, A. J. (1989). Validity of questionnaire information on frequency of coitus. American Journal of Epidemiology, 130, 94–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coxon, A. P. (1999). Parallel accounts? Discrepancies between self-report (diary) and recall (questionnaire) measures of the same sexual behaviour. AIDS Care, 11, 221–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leigh, B. C., Gillmore, M. R., & Morrison, D. M. (1998). Comparison of diary and retrospective measures for recording alcohol consumption and sexual activity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 119–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ramjee, G., Weber, A. E., & Morar, N. S. (1999). Recording sexual behavior: Comparison of recall questionnaires with a coital diary. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 26, 374–380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Minnis, A. M., & Padian, N. S. (2001). Reliability of adolescents’ self-reported sexual behavior: A comparison of two diary methodologies. Journal of Adolescent Health, 28, 394–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shrier, L. A., Shih, M. C., & Beardslee, W. R. (2005). Affect and sexual behavior in adolescents: A review of the literature and comparison of momentary sampling with diary and retrospective self-report methods of measurement. Pediatrics, 115, e573–e581.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graham, C. A., Catania, J. A., Brand, R., Duong, T., & Canchola, J. A. (2003). Recalling sexual behavior: A methodological analysis of memory recall bias via interview using the diary as the gold standard. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 325–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hays, M. A., Irsula, B., McMullen, S. L., & Feldblum, P. J. (2001). A comparison of three daily coital diary designs and a phone-in regimen. Contraception, 63, 159–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steiner, M. J., Hertz-Picciotto, I., Taylor, D., Schoenbach, V., & Wheeless, A. (2001). Retrospective vs. prospective coital frequency and menstrual cycle length in a contraceptive effectiveness trial. Annals of Epidemiology, 11, 428–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lauritsen, J. L., & Swicegood, C. G. (1997). The consistency of self-reported initiation of sexual activity. Family Planning Perspectives, 29, 215–221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anderson, B. L., & Broffitt, B. (1988). Is there a reliable and valid self-report measure of sexual behavior? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 17, 509–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones, J., Mosher, W., & Daniels, K. (2012). Current contraceptive use in the United States 2006–2010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995. National Health Statistics Reports, 60, 1–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kornich, S., Brines, J., & Leupp, K. (2012). Egalitarianism, housework, and sexual frequency in marriage. American Sociological Review, 78, 26–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaiser Family Foundation. State health facts: Population distribution by race/ethnicity. Accessed 5 Sept 2013.
  15. 15.
    Verbrugge, L. M. (1980). Health diaries. Medical Care, 18, 73–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wiseman, V., Conteh, L., & Matovui, F. (2005). Using diaries to collect data in resource-poor settings: Questions on design and implementation. Health Policy Plan, 20, 394–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Larissa R. Brunner Huber
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jordan E. Lyerly
    • 1
  • Ashley M. Young
    • 1
  • Jacek Dmochowski
    • 2
  • Tara M. Vick
    • 3
  • Delia Scholes
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Public Health SciencesUNC CharlotteCharlotteUSA
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUNC CharlotteCharlotteUSA
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyCarolinas Medical CenterCharlotteUSA
  4. 4.Group Health Research InstituteGroup Health CooperativeSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations