Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1280–1290 | Cite as

Positive Childbirth Experiences in US Hospitals: A Mixed Methods Analysis

  • Laura B. Attanasio
  • Marianne E. McPherson
  • Katy B. Kozhimannil
Article

Abstract

Research on maternity care quality in the US often focuses on avoiding adverse events. Positive birth experiences receive less attention. This analysis used a mixed methods approach to identify factors associated with confidence and positive experiences during birth among a national sample of US mothers. Data are from a nationally representative survey of women who delivered a singleton baby in a US hospital in 2005 (N = 1,573). We explored the relationship between confidence, positive birth experiences and socio-demographic characteristics as well as factors related to the clinical encounter and health systems, including common obstetric procedures and interventions. Self-reported confidence during birth was the outcome in quantitative analyses. We used logistic regression analysis and qualitative analysis of open-ended survey responses. Approximately 42 % of mothers reported feeling confident during birth. Confidence going into labor was the strongest predictor of confidence during birth (adjusted odds ratio 12.88 for nulliparous women, 8.54 for parous women). Black and Hispanic race/ethnicity (compared to white) and having partner support were positively associated with confidence during birth for nulliparous women. Qualitative analyses revealed that positive experiences were related to previous birth experiences, communication between women and their clinicians, perceptions of shared decision-making, and communication among clinicians related to the timing and logistics of managing complications and coordinating care. For clinicians who care for women during pregnancy and childbirth, thoughtful, deliberate attention to factors promoting positive birth experiences may help create circumstances amenable to enhancing the quality of obstetric care and improving outcomes for mothers and infants.

Keywords

Obstetrics Birth Mixed methods Patient satisfaction Patient communication 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD; Grant Number R03HD070868) and the Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health Grant (Grant Number K12HD055887) from NICHD, the Office of Research on Women’s Health, and the National Institute on Aging, at the National Institutes of Health, administered by the University of Minnesota Deborah E. Powell Center for Women’s Health. We also wish to thank Amy Romano, CNM, and Christina McPherson, CNM for their valuable feedback on the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Behrman, R. E., & Butler, A. S. (Eds.). (2007). Preterm birth: Causes, consequences, and prevention. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Angood, P. B., Armstrong, E. M., Ashton, D., Burstin, H., Corry, M. P., Delbanco, S. F., et al. (2010). Blueprint for action: Steps toward a high-quality, high-value maternity care system. Women’s Health Issues, 20, S18–S49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Ventura, S. J., Osterman, M. J. K., Wilson, E. C., & Mathews, T. J. (2012). Births: Final data for 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep, 61(1). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_01.pdf.
  4. 4.
    Lowe, N. K. (1991). Maternal confidence in coping with labor A self-efficacy concept. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 20(6), 457.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Booth, C. L., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1984). Expected and actual experience in labour and delivery and their relationship to maternal attachment. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 2(2), 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crowe, K., & von Baeyer, C. (1989). Predictors of a positive childbirth experience. Birth, 16(2), 59–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alehagen, S. (2001). Fear during labor. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 80(4), 315–320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adams, S., Eberhard-Gran, M., & Eskild, A. (2012). Fear of childbirth and duration of labour: A study of 2,206 women with intended vaginal delivery. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 119(10), 1238–1246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laursen, M., Johansen, C., & Hedegaard, M. (2009). Fear of childbirth and risk for birth complications in nulliparous women in the Danish National Birth Cohort. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 116(10), 1350–1355.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ryding, E. L., Wijma, B., Wijma, K., & Rydhstrom, H. (1998). Fear of childbirth during pregnancy may increase the risk of emergency cesarean section. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 77(5), 542–547.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson, R., & Slade, P. (2002). Does fear of childbirth during pregnancy predict emergency caesarean section? British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 109(11), 1213–1221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fair, C., & Morrison, T. (2012). The relationship between prenatal control, expectations, experienced control, and birth satisfaction among primiparous women. Midwifery, 28(1), 39–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Green, J. M. (1990). Expectations, experiences, and psychological outcomes of childbirth: A prospective study of 825 women. Birth, 17(1), 15–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hodnett, E. D. (2002). Pain and women’s satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 186(5), S160–S172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gibbins, J., & Thomson, A. M. (2001). Women’s expectations and experiences of childbirth. Midwifery, 17(4), 302–313.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Drummond, J., & Rickwood, D. (1997). Childbirth confidence: Validating the childbirth self-efficacy inventory (CBSEI) in an Australian sample. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(3), 613–622.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leap, N., Sandal, J., Buckland, S., & Huber, U. (2010). Journey to confidence: Women’s experiences of pain in labour and relational continuity of care. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 55(3), 234–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Waldenström, U., Borg, I., Olsson, B., Sköld, M., & Wall, S. (1996). The childbirth experience: A study of 295 new mothers. Birth, 23(3), 144–153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Waldenström, U. (1999). Experience of labor and birth in 1111 women. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 47(5), 471–482.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Christiaens, W., & Bracke, P. (2007). Assessment of social psychological determinants of satisfaction with childbirth in a cross-national perspective. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 7, 26.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bryanton, J. (2008). Predictors of women’s perceptions of the childbirth experience. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 37(1), 24–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lavender, T., Walkingshaw, S. A., & Walton, I. (1999). A prospective study of women’s views of factors contributing to a positive birth experience. Midwifery, 15(1), 40–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Walker, B., & Erdman, A. (1984). Childbirth education programs: The relationship between confidence and knowledge. Birth, 11(2), 103–108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hillier, C. A., & Slade, P. (1989). The impact of antenatal classes on knowledge, anxiety and confidence in primiparous women. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 7(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gagnon, A. J., & Sandall, J. (2011). Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011(10), 1–30.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Taylor, H., Brenner, J., Overmeyer, G., Siegel, J. W., & Terhanian, G. (2001). Touchdown! Online polling scores big in November 2000. Public Perspective, 12, 38–39.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Terhanian, G., Bremer, J., Smith, R., & Thomas, R. (2001). Correcting data from online surveys for the effects of nonrandom selection and nonrandom assignment. Harris Interactive White Paper, 2000, 1–13.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Declercq, E., Cunningham, D. K., Johnson, C., & Sakala, C. (2008). Mothers’ reports of postpartum pain associated with vaginal and cesarean deliveries: Results of a national survey. Birth, 35(1), 16–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Declercq, E., Labbok, M. H., Sakala, C., & O’Hara, M. A. (2009). Hospital practices and women’s likelihood of fulfilling their intention to exclusively breastfeed. American Journal of Public Health, 99(5), 929–935.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Declercq, E. R., Sakala, C., Corry, M. P., & Applebaum, S. (2006). Listening to mothers II: Report of the second national survey of women’s childbearing experiences. New York: Childbirth Connection.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tatano Beck, C., Gable, R. K., Sakala, C., & Declercq, E. R. (2011). Postpartum depressive symptomatology: Results from a two-stage US national survey. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 56(5), 427–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Young, R. L., & Declercq, E. (2010). Implications of subdividing marital status: Are unmarried mothers with partners different from unmarried mothers without partners? An exploratory analysis. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(2), 209–214.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kozhimannil, K. B., Attanasio, L. B., McGovern, P. M., Gjerdingen, D. K., & Johnson, P. J. (2013). Reevaluating the relationship between prenatal employment and birth outcomes: A policy-relevant application of propensity score matching. Women’s Health Issues, 23(2), e77–e85.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dannenbring, D., Stevens, M. J., & House, A. E. (1997). Predictors of childbirth pain and maternal satisfaction. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20(2), 127–142.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Blüml, V., Stammler-Safar, M., Reitinger, A. K., Resch, I., Naderer, A., & Leithner, K. (2012). A qualitative approach to examine women’s experience of planned cesarean. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 41(6), E82–E90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Knox, G. E., Simpson, K. R., & Townsend, K. E. (2003). High reliability perinatal units: Further observations and a suggested plan for action. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management, 23(4), 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Miller, K., Riley, W., & Davis, S. (2009). Identifying key nursing and team behaviours to achieve high reliability. Journal of Nursing Management, 17(2), 247–255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bergstrom, L., Seidel, J., Skillman-Hull, L., & Roberts, J. (1997). “I gotta push: Please let me push!” Social interactions during the change from first to second stage labor. Birth, 24(3), 173–180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lyerly, A. D., Mitchell, L. M., & Armstrong, E. M. (2007). Risks, values, and decision making surrounding pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109(4), 979–984.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Goldberg, H. (2009). Informed decision making in maternity care. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 18(1), 32–40.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Broaddus, B. M., & Chandrasekhar, S. (2011). Informed consent in obstetric anesthesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 112(4), 912–915.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2009). ACOG committee opinion #439: Informed consent. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 114, 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura B. Attanasio
    • 1
  • Marianne E. McPherson
    • 2
  • Katy B. Kozhimannil
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Health Policy and ManagementUniversity of Minnesota School of Public HealthMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.National Initiative for Children’s Healthcare QualityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations