Abstract
The purpose of this article is to describe the initial assessment for the development of a home visiting (HV) system in a state with no existing system. We outline a mixed methods process where the quantitative component was used to identify the communities that possess “at-risk” profiles, and the qualitative component explored the resources and gaps in existing HV services. We employed a mixed methods approach, using six categories of indicators from quantitative secondary data sources to identify “at-risk” profiles for Alabama’s 67 counties. A weighted score for each indicator was calculated and counties were ranked. Surveys and focus groups were conducted to further define resources and gaps of existing HV programs. The composite indicator scores identified 13 counties as having the highest level of risk. Five of these 13 communities had no HV home visitation services. Areas of focus for future HV system development include trust, communication, availability, cost, and timeliness. In this assessment related to the Alabama HV system, we used quantitative data to apply criteria to the indicators being measured and qualitative data to supplement the quantitative findings. We examined resources, gaps, program quality, and capacity of the existing HV programs in order to assist in the future development of the HV system and early childhood system. The methods presented in this paper have potential applications beyond HV programs and systems, including broader examinations of complex systems for service provision to the maternal and child health populations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gomby, D. S., et al. (1993). Home visiting: Analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children: Home Visiting, 3(3), 6–22.
Weiss, H., & Klein, L. (2006). Changing the conversation about home visiting: Scaling up with quality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
The role of home-visitation programs in improving health outcomes for children and families. American Academy of Pediatrics. Council on Child and Adolescent Health. Pediatrics, 1998. 101(3 Pt 1): p. 486–9.
The role of preschool home-visiting programs in improving children’s developmental and health outcomes. Pediatrics, 2009. 123(2): p. 598-603.
Wasik, B. H., Bryant, D. M., & Lyons, C. M. (1990). Home visiting: Procedures for helping families. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Issel, L. M., et al. (2011). A review of prenatal home-visiting effectiveness for improving birth outcomes. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 40(2), 157–165.
Hargreaves, M., et al. (2013). Evaluating infrastructure development in complex home visiting systems. American Journal of Evaluation, 34(2), 147–169.
Greene, J., Caracelli, V., & Graham, W. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274.
Creswell, J. W., et al. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. County Health Rankings. (2012). Available from: www.countyhealthrankings.org.
Goldhagen, J., et al. (2005). The health status of southern children: A neglected regional disparity. Pediatrics, 116(6), e746–e753.
Geronimus, A. T. (2000). To mitigate, resist, or undo: Addressing structural influences on the health of urban populations. American Journal of Public Health, 90(6), 867–872.
Collins, J. W, Jr., & Hawkes, E. K. (1997). Racial differences in post-neonatal mortality in Chicago: What risk factors explain the black infant’s disadvantage? Ethnicity and Health, 2(1–2), 117–125.
Paneth, N. S. (1995). The problem of low birth weight. The Future of Children: Low Birth Weight, 5(1), 19–34.
Kennedy, B. P., Kawachi, I., & Prothrow-Stith, D. (1996). Income distribution and mortality: Cross sectional ecological study of the Robin Hood index in the United States. BMJ, 312(7037), 1004–1007.
Miller, D. C., & Salkind, N. J. (2002). Handbook of research design and social measurement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
KIDS COUNT Data Center. (2010). Available from: www.kidscount.org.
ESRI. (2010). ArcGIS Desktop: Release 9. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
Brown, S. L., & Rinelli, L. N. (2010). Family structure, family processes, and adolescent smoking and drinking. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(2), 259–273.
Olds, D. L., et al. (1997). Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect. Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(8), 637–643.
Olds, D. L. (2002). Prenatal and infancy home visiting by nurses: From randomized trials to community replication. Prevention Science, 3(3), 153–172.
Olds, D. L., et al. (2004). Effects of nurse home-visiting on maternal life course and child development: Age 6 follow-up results of a randomized trial. Pediatrics, 114(6), 1550–1559.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding and support provided by Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Alabama Department of Public Health (contract # 001131165). The authors would like to thank Deanna Gomby, Ph.D., for her in-depth and valuable critique of the manuscript, and the Birmingham Atlas of Health Outcomes (BAHO) for mapping home visiting services and communities of greatest need on the statewide map.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wingate, M.S., Fifolt, M., Preskitt, J. et al. Assessing Needs and Resources for the Home Visiting System in Alabama: A Mixed Methods Approach. Matern Child Health J 18, 1075–1084 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1335-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1335-5