Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 949–958 | Cite as

Effects of Interdisciplinary Training on MCH Professionals, Organizations and Systems

  • Lewis H. Margolis
  • Angela Rosenberg
  • Karl Umble
  • Linda Chewning
Article

Abstract

We studied the effects of the Interdisciplinary Leadership Development Program (ILDP) on MCH trainees from five MCHB-funded training programs at the UNC-Chapel Hill from the years 2001–2008. Specifically, we examined attitudes/beliefs about interdisciplinary practice and the frequency of use of interdisciplinary skills; identified effects of interdisciplinary training on career choices; and, examined the ways in which graduates used their interdisciplinary skills to effect change in MCH organizations and systems, up to 8 years after completion of training. Using a post-test design, participants in the ILDP were contacted to complete a web-based survey. Non-participating LEND and public health graduates were recruited for comparison. Guided by EvaluLEAD, we designed questions that asked graduates to rate the influence of their programs on their attitudes/beliefs and skills (on 5-point Likert scales), and to describe those influences in some detail in open-ended questions. The 208 respondents represented 59.6 % of the graduates from 2001 through 2008. Model-predicted mean levels of frequency of use of interdisciplinary skilIs was associated with ILDP participation (p = 0.008) and nearly so for interdisciplinary attitudes/beliefs (p = 0.067). There is an association between four domains of systems changes and frequency of skill use: develop/improve a program (3.24 vs. 2.74, p < 0.0001); improve the way an organization works (3.31 vs. 2.88, p < 0.0001); develop/improve a partnership (3.22 vs. 2.83, p < 0.0003); and, develop a policy (3.32 vs. 2.98, p < 0.0013). Graduates used interdisciplinary training to improve outcomes for families and to effect change in MCH systems. MCH leaders should disseminate, more broadly, rigorous assessments of the training intended to develop leadership competencies that underpin effective interdisciplinary practice.

Keywords

Interdisciplinary training Leadership training Inter-professional training 

References

  1. 1.
    Kreider, R., & Elliott, D. (2009). America’s families and living arrangements: 2007 P20-561. Current Population Reports.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goulding, M., Rogers, M., & Smith, S. (2003). Public health and aging: trends in aging—United States and worldwide. MMWR, 52, 101–106.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frey, W. (2012). America reaches its demographic tipping point. Demographics, ethnicity, race, children and families. Brookings Institution. February 9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyle, C., Boulet, S., Schieve, L., Cohen, R., Blumberg, S., Yeargin-Allsopp, M., et al. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997–2008. Pediatrics, 127, 1034–1042.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dodds, J., Vann, W., Lee, J., Rosenberg, A., Rounds, K., Roth, M., et al. (2010). The UNC-CH MCH Leadership Training Consortium: Building the capacity to develop interdisciplinary MCH leaders. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14, 642–648.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    MCH Leadership Competencies Workgroup (Eds). (2009). Maternal and child health leadership competencies. June 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Athey, J., Kavanagh, L., & Bagley, K. (2001). The MCH Training Program: an evaluation. Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cooper, H., Carlisle, C., Gibbs, T., & Watkins, C. (2001). Developing an evidence base for interdisciplinary learning: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(2), 228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hammick, M., Freeth, D., Koppel, I., Reeves, S., & Barr, H. (2007). A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9. Medical Teacher, 29(8), 735–751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reeves, S., Zwarenstein, M., Goldman, J., Barr, H., Freeth, D., Hammick, M., et al. (2008). Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 23(1), CD002213.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Remington, T. L., Foulk, M. A., & Williams, B. C. (2006). Evaluation of evidence for interprofessional education. American Journal of Pharmacy Education, 70(3), 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hall, P., & Weaver, L. (2001). Interdisciplinary education and teamwork: A long and winding road. Medical Education, 35(9), 867–875.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grove, J., Kibel, B., & Haas, T. (2005). EvaluLEAD: A guide for shaping and evaluating leadership development programs. Oakland: W.K. Kellogg Foundation and Public Health Institute.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lewis H. Margolis
    • 1
  • Angela Rosenberg
    • 2
  • Karl Umble
    • 3
  • Linda Chewning
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities, Department of Allied Health SciencesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.North Carolina Institute for Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations