Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 77–86 | Cite as

An Assessment of State Level Sexual Assault Prevalence Estimates

Article

Abstract

The purpose of our research is to compare sexual violence prevalence rates from three sources of state level data. Public health officials, legislators and other policymakers often require state-level sexual assault prevalence estimates to justify funding and rationalize both new and ongoing sexual violence prevention programs, as well as programs for victims. We compared survey design and resulting prevalence rates of the three surveys frequently used at the state level: the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), the National Violence Against Women Survey (NVAWS) extrapolations, and replications of the NVAWS. Although the specificity of the questions used in the NVAWS provides a clearer picture of the prevalence of sexual assault than the BRFSS questions, the sexual violence module on the BRFSS survey has the advantage that it is used regularly by some states. Currently available female sexual assault prevalence estimates differ widely at the state level but can be used when interpreted with informed caution. The new National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Surveillance System holds promise for providing better estimates in the future.

Keywords

BRFSS NVAW Sexual assault State level estimates 

References

  1. 1.
    Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women. U.S. Department of Justice: Office of Justice Programs NCJ 183781.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fisher, B. S., Daigle, L. E., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2003). Reporting sexual victimization to the police and others: Results from a national-level study of college women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(1), 6–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rennison, C. M. (2002). Rape and sexual assault: Reporting to police and medical attention, 1992–2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dube, S. R., Anda, R. F., Whitfield, C. L., et al. (2005). Long-term consequences of childhood sexual abuse by gender of victim. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(5), 430–438.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schneider, V. W., & Wiersema, B. (1990). Limits and the use of the uniform crime reports. In P. J. Baunach & R. R. Roberg (Eds.), Measuring crime: Large-scale, long-range efforts. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Belknap, J., Fisher, B. S., & Cullen, F. T. (1999). The development of a comprehensive measure of the sexual victimization of college women. Violence Against Women, 5(2), 185–214.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bachman, R. (2000). A comparison of annual incidence rates and contextual characteristics of intimate partner violence against women from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCSV) and the National Violence Against Women Survey (NVAWS). Violence Against Women, 6, 839–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koss, M. P. (1996). The measurement of rape victimization in crime surveys. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koss, M. P., Gidcyz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162–170.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fischer, B. S. (2009). The effects of survey question wording on rape estimates: Evidence from a quasi-experimental design. Violence Against Women, 15, 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Masho, S. W., Odor, R. K., & Adera, T. (2005). Sexual assault in Virginia: A population-based study. Women’s Health Issues, 15(4), 157–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Busch, N. B., Bell, H., DiNitto, D., & Neff, J. A. (2003). A health survey of Texans: A focus on sexual assault. Austin, TX: Institute on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berliner, L., Fine, D., & Moore, D. (2001). Sexual assault experiences and perceptions of community response to sexual assault: A survey of Washington State women. Harbor View Center for Sexual Assault and Traumatic Stress and Washington State University.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Potter, S. J., Laflamme, D., Banyard, V. L., Mattern, G., Moynihan, M. M., & Stapleton, J. G. (2006). NH state wide sexual assault survey. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire and the New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peterson, B. (2009). Research Consultant, Utah Commission on Criminal And Juvenile Justice. Salt Lake City, UT.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1999). Prevalence and incidence of violence against women: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. The Criminologist, 24(3), 1, 4, 13–14.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to female and female-to male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6(2), 142–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Basile, K. C., Chen, J., Black, M. C., & Saltzman, L. E. (2007). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence victimization among U.S. adults, 2001–2003. Violence and Victims, 22(4), 437–448.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kilpatrick, D. G., & Ruggiero, K. J. (2003). Rape in New Hampshire: A report to the state. Charleston, SC: National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kilpatrick, D. G., & Ruggiero, K. J. (2003). Rape in Virginia: A report to the commonwealth. Charleston, SC: National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kilpatrick, D. G., & Ruggiero, K. J. (2003). Rape in Washington: A report to the state. Charleston, SC: National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kilpatrick, D. G., & Ruggiero, K. J. (2003). Rape in Texas: A report to the state. Charleston, SC: National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kilpatrick, D., & Ruggiero, K. (2003). Rape in Utah: A report to the state. Charleston, SC: National Violence Against Women Prevention Research Center, Medical University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). Behavioral risk factor surveillance, operational and user’s guide, version 3.0.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Figgs, L. W., Bloom, Y., Dugbatey, K., Stanwyck, C. A., Nelson, D. E., & Brownson, R. C. (2000). Uses of behavioral risk factor surveillance system data, 1993–1997. American Journal of Public Health, 90(5), 774–776.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yu, E. S. H., Chen, E. H., Kim, K. K., & Abdulrahim, S. (2002). Smoking among Chinese Americans: Behavior, knowledge, and beliefs. American Journal of Public Health, 92(6), 1007–1013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Keeter, S., Miller, C., Kohut, A., Groves, R., & Presser, S. (2000). Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 125–148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Piazza, T. (1993). Meeting the challenge of answering machines. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kinne, S., & Topolski, T. D. (2005). Inclusion of people with disabilities in telephone health surveillance surveys. American Journal of Public Health, 95(3), 512–517.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nelson, D. E., Powell-Griner, E., Town, M., & Kovar, M. G. (2003). A comparison of national estimates from the National Health Interview Survey and the behavioral risk factor surveillance system. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1335–1341.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Siegel, P. Z., Qualters, J. R., Mowery, P. D., Campostrini, S., Leutzinger, C., & McQueen, D. V. (2001). Subgroup-specific effects of questionnaire wording on population-based estimates of mammography prevalence. American Journal of Public Health, 91(5), 817–820.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Waller, A. E., Martin, S. L., & Ornstein, M. L. (2000). Health related surveillance data on violence against women: State and local sources. Violence Against Women, 6(8), 868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Choudhary, E., Coben, J. H., & Bossarte, R. M. (2008). Gender and time differences in the associations between sexual violence victimization, health outcomes, and risk behaviors. American Journal of Men’s Health, 2(3), 254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Couper, M. P. (1997). Survey introductions and data quality. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    O’Brien, E. M., Black, M. C., Carley-Baxter, L. R., & Simon, T. R. (2006). Sensitive topics, survey nonresponse, and considerations for interviewer training. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 31(5), 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Smith, D. M., Schwarz, N., Roberts, T. R., & Ubel, P. A. (2006). Why are you calling me? How study introductions change response patterns. Quality of Life Research, 15(4), 621–630.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., & Van Den Bergh, H. (2000). Effects of introductions in Large-Scale Telephone Survey interviews. Sociological Methods & Research, 28(3), 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dekeseredy, W. S. (1995). Enhancing the quality of survey data on women abuse: Examples from a national Canadian study. Violence Against Women, 1, 158–173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Koss, M. P. (1993). Detecting the scope of rape: A review of prevalence research methods. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 198–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Catania, J. A., Binson, D., Canchola, J., Pollack, L. M., Hauck, W., & Coates, T. J. (1996). Effects of interviewer gender, interviewer choice, and item wording on responses to questions concerning sexual behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(3), 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Violence and threats of violence against women and men in the United States, 1994–1996. Denver, CO/Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Policy Research/Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research 1999.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Koss, M. P. (1992). The underdetection of rape: Methodological choices influence incidence estimates. Journal of Social Issues, 48(1), 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wrathall, J. (2009). Survey Coordinator, Utah Department of Health. Salt Lake City, Utah.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Intimate partner violence prevention scientific information: Data sources. http://www.cdc.gov/NCIPC/dvp/IPV/ipv-data.htm. Accessed July 1, 2009.
  45. 45.
    National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (1984–2008). Behavioral risk factor surveillance system.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (1991–2007). YRBSS: Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Federal Bureau of Investigation. (1995–2008). Uniform crime reports: U.S. Federal Government.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (1997). Youth risk behavior surveillance: National College Health Risk Behavior Survey—United States, 1995.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1992–2008). National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wasco, S. M. (2006). Responding to sexual assault victims’ medical and emotional needs: A national study of the services provided by SANE programs. Research in Nursing and Health, 29, 384–398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Speck, P., & Aiken, M. (1995). 20 Years of community nursing service: Memphis sexual assault resource center. Tennessee Nurse, 58, 15–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Horton Social Science CenterUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health Management & PolicyUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  3. 3.State Maternal & Child Health EpidemiologistNH Division of Public Health ServicesConcordUSA

Personalised recommendations