Skip to main content

Initiation of and Barriers to Prenatal Care Use Among Low-Income Women in San Antonio, Texas

Maternal and Child Health Journal volume 14, Article number: 133 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Healthy People 2010 goals set a target of 90% of mothers starting prenatal care in the first trimester of pregnancy. While there are questions about the value of prenatal care (PNC), there is much observational evidence of the benefits of PNC including reduction in maternal, fetal, perinatal, and infant deaths. The objective of this study was to understand barriers to PNC as well as factors that impact early initiation of care among low-income women in San Antonio, Texas. A survey study was conducted among low-income women seeking care at selected public health clinics in San Antonio. Interviews were conducted with 444 women. Study results show that women with social barriers, those who were less educated, who were living alone (i.e. without an adult partner or spouse), or who had not planned their pregnancies were more likely to initiate PNC late in their pregnancies. It was also observed that women who enrolled in the WIC program were more likely to initiate PNC early in their pregnancies. Women who initiated PNC late in pregnancy had the highest odds of reporting service-related barriers to receiving care. However, financial and personal barriers created no significant obstacles to women initiating PNC. The majority of women in this study reported that they were aware of the importance of PNC, knew where to go for care during pregnancy, and were able to pay for care through financial assistance, yet some did not initiate early prenatal care. This clearly establishes that the decision making process regarding PNC is complex. It is important that programs consider the complexity of the decision-making process and the priorities women set during pregnancy in planning interventions, particularly those that target low-income women. This could increase the likelihood that these women will seek PNC early in their pregnancies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Sutton, P. D., et al. (2003). Births: Final data for 2002. National Statistics Report; Vol. 52, no. 10. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2003. Available at http://wonder.cdc.gov/data2010/obj.htm.

  2. US Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy people 2010 2nd ed. With understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health. Vols. 2 November 2000. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moos, M. K. (2006). Prenatal care: Limitations and opportunities. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 35, 278–285. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00039.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexander, G. R., & Kotelchuck, M. (2001). Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: History, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Reports, 116, 306–316.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hulsey, T. M. (2001). Association between early prenatal care and mother’s intention of a desire for the pregnancy. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 30, 275–282. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2001.tb01545.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Misra, D. P., & Guyer, B. (1998). Benefits and limitations of prenatal care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 2073. doi:10.1001/jama.280.24.2073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alexander, G. R., & Korenbrot, C. C. (1995). The role of prenatal care in preventing low birth weight. The Future of Children, 5(1), 103–120. doi:10.2307/1602510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fiscella, K. (1992). Does prenatal care improve birth outcomes? A critical review. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 80, 867–879.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tossounian, S. A., Schoendorf, K. C., & Kiely, J. L. (1997). Racial differences in perceived barriers to prenatal care. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 1(4), 229–236. doi:10.1023/A:1022370627706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Institute of Medicine. (1988). Prenatal care: Reaching mothers, reaching infants. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alexander, G. R., Kogan, M. D., & Himes, J. H. (1999). 1994–1996 U.S. singleton birth weight percentiles for gestational age by race, Hispanic origin, and gender. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 3, 225–231. doi:10.1023/A:1022381506823.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Butz, M., Funkhouser, A., Caleb, L., & Rosenstein, B. J. (1993). Infant health utilization predicted by pattern of prenatal care. Pediatrics, 92, 50–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. York, R., Tulman, L., & Brown, K. (2000). Postnatal care in low-income urban African American women: Relationship to level of prenatal care sought. Journal of Perinatology, 1, 34–40. doi:10.1038/sj.jp.7200302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pagnini, D. L., & Reichman, N. E. (2000). Psychosocial factors and the timing of prenatal care among women in New Jersey’s healthy start program. Family Planning Perspectives, 32(2), 56–64. doi:10.2307/2648213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalmuss, D., & Fennelly, K. (1990). Barriers to prenatal care among low-income women in New York city. Family planning perspectives, 22, 215–218; 231.

  16. Meis, P. J., Klebanoff, M., Thom, E., Dombrowski, M. P., Sibai, B., Moawad, H., et al. (2003). Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha hydroxyprogersterone caproate. The New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 2379–2385. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa035140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Centers for Disease Control, Prevention [CDC]. (2000). Entry into prenatal care, United States, 1989–1997. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 49(18), 393–398.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Park, J. H., Vincent, D., & Hastings-Tolsma, M. (2007). Disparity in prenatal care among women of color in the USA. Midwifery, 23(1), 28–37. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2005.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Frisbie, W. P., Echevarria, S., & Hummer, R. A. (2001). Prenatal care utilization among non-Hispanic Whites, African Americans, and Mexican Americans. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 5(1), 21–33. doi:10.1023/A:1011393717603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zaid, A., Fullerton, J. T., & Moore, T. (1996). Factors affecting access to prenatal care for U.S./Mexico border-dwelling Hispanic women. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 41(4), 277–284. doi:10.1016/0091-2182(96)00030-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aved, B. M., Irwin, M. M., Cummings, L. S., & Findeisen, N. (1993). Barriers to prenatal care for low-income women. The Western Journal of Medicine, 158, 493–498.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Claire, P. A., Smeriglio, V. L., Alexander, C. S., Connell, F. A., & Niebyl, J. R. (1990). Situational and financial barriers to prenatal care in a sample of low-income, inner-city women. Public Health Reports, 105(3), 264–267.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Braveman, P., Egerter, S., Marchi, K., Neuhaus, J., & Pearl, M. (2000). Barriers to timely prenatal care among women with insurance: The importance of pre-pregnancy factors. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 95, 874–880. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00780-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mayer, J. P. (1997). Unintended childbearing, maternal beliefs, and delay of prenatal care. Birth, 24(4), 247–252. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.tb00598.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Curry, M. A. (1990). Factors associated with inadequate prenatal care. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 7, 245–252. doi:10.1207/s15327655jchn0704_7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lia-Hoagberg, B., Rode, P., Skovholt, C., Oberg, C., Mullett, S., & Choi, T. (1990). Barriers and motivators to prenatal care among low-income women. Social Science & Medicine, 30, 487–495. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(90)90351-R.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Beckman, C. A., Buford, T. A., & Witt, J. B. (2000). Perceived barriers to prenatal care services. The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 25(1), 43–46. doi:10.1097/00005721-200001000-00009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gazmararian, J. A., Schwartz, K. S., Amacker, L. B., et al. (1997). Barriers to prenatal care among Medicaid managed care enrollees: Patient and provider perceptions. HMO Practice, 11(1), 18–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Byrd, T. L., Mullen, P. D., Selwyn, B. J., & Lorimor, R. (1996). Initiation of prenatal care by low-income Hispanic women in Houston. Public Health Reports, 111, 536–540.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Napravnik, S., Royce, R., Walter, E., et al. (2000). HIV-1 infected women and prenatal care utilization: Barriers and facilitators. AIDS Patient Care and STDs, 14(8), 411–420. doi:10.1089/108729100416623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Delgado-Rodriguez, M., Gomez-Olmedo, M., Bueno-Cavanillas, A., & Galvez-Vargas, R. (1997). Unplanned pregnancy as a major determinant in inadequate use of prenatal care. Preventive Medicine, 26, 834–838. doi:10.1006/pmed.1997.0217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Campbell, J. D., Stanford, J. B., & Ewigman, B. (1996). The social pregnancy interaction model: Conceptualizing cognitive, social and cultural barriers to prenatal care. Applied Behavioral Science Review, 4(1), 81–97. doi:10.1016/S1068-8595(96)80018-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Egerter, S., Braveman, P., & Marchi, K. (2002). Timing of insurance coverage and use of prenatal care among low-income women. American Journal of Public Health, 92(3), 423–427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Johnson, A., Hatcher, B. J., El-Khorazaty, M. N., Milligan, R. A., Bhaskar, B., Rodan, M. F., et al. (2007). Determinants of inadequate prenatal care utilization by African American women. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 18, 620–636. doi:10.1353/hpu.2007.0059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kahler, L. R., O’Shea, R. M., Duffy, L. C., et al. (1992). Factors associated with rates of participation in WIC by eligible women. Public Health Reports, 107(1), 60–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX, 78249, USA

    T. S. Sunil

  2. Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, OH, USA

    William D. Spears

  3. University Health Systems, San Antonio, TX, USA

    Linda Hook

  4. San Antonio Metropolitan Health District, San Antonio, TX, USA

    Josephine Castillo & Cynthia Torres

Authors
  1. T. S. Sunil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William D. Spears
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda Hook
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Josephine Castillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cynthia Torres
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. S. Sunil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sunil, T.S., Spears, W.D., Hook, L. et al. Initiation of and Barriers to Prenatal Care Use Among Low-Income Women in San Antonio, Texas. Matern Child Health J 14, 133 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0419-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0419-0

Keywords

  • Prenatal care
  • Barriers
  • Preconception care
  • Pregnancy