Skip to main content

Reviewing Performance of Birth Certificate and Hospital Discharge Data to Identify Births Complicated by Maternal Diabetes

Maternal and Child Health Journal volume 13, Article number: 660 (2009) Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives Public health surveillance of diabetes during pregnancy is needed. Birth certificate and hospital discharge data are population-based, routinely available and economical to obtain and analyze, but their quality has been criticized. It is important to understand the usefulness and limitations of these data sources for surveillance of diabetes during pregnancy. Methods We conducted a comprehensive literature review to summarize the validity of birth certificate and hospital discharge data for identifying diabetes-complicated births. Results Sensitivities for birth certificate data identifying prepregnancy diabetes mellitus (PDM) ranged from 47% to 52%, median 50% (kappas: min = 0.210, med = 0.497, max = 0.523). Sensitivities for birth certificate data identifying gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) ranged from 46% to 83%, median 65% (kappas: min = 0.545, med = 0.667, max = 0.828). Sensitivities for the two studies using hospital discharge data for identifying PDM were 78% and 95% (kappas: 0.839 and 0.964), and for GDM were 71% and 81% (kappas: 0.584 and 0.840). Specificities were consistently above 98% for both data sources. Conclusions Overall, hospital discharge data performed better than birth certificates, marginally so for identifying GDM but substantially so for identifying PDM. Reports based on either source alone should focus on trends and disparities and include the caveat that results under represent the problem. Linking the two data sources may improve identification of both GDM and PDM cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Boyle, J. P., Honeycutt, A. A., Narayan, K. M., et al. (2001). Projection of diabetes burden through 2050: Impact of changing demography and disease prevalence in the U.S. Diabetes Care, 24(11), 1936–1940. doi:10.2337/diacare.24.11.1936.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. American Diabetes Association. (2004). Preconception care of women with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 27(Suppl 1), S76–S78. doi:10.2337/diacare.27.2007.S76.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Diabetes Association. (2004). Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 27(Suppl 1), S88–S90. doi:10.2337/diacare.27.2007.S88.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ben Haroush, A., Yogev, Y., & Hod, M. (2004). Epidemiology of gestational diabetes mellitus and its association with Type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 21(2), 103–113. doi:10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00985.x.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hunt, K. J., & Schuller, K. L. (2007). The increasing prevalence of diabetes in pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 34(2), 173–199. vii. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2007.03.002.

  6. Russell, M. A., Carpenter, M. W., & Coustan, D. R. (2007). Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 50(4), 949–958.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hillier, T. A., Vesco, K. K., Pedula, K. L., Beil, T. L., Whitlock, E. P., & Pettitt, D. J. (2008). Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(10), 766–775.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dabelea, D., Snell-Bergeon, J. K., Hartsfield, C. L., Bischoff, K. J., Hamman, R. F., McDuffie, R. S. (2005). Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) over time and by birth cohort: Kaiser Permanente of Colorado GDM Screening Program. Diabetes Care, 28(3), 579–584.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrara, A., Kahn, H. S., Quesenberry, C. P., Riley, C., & Hedderson, M. M. (2004). An increase in the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus: Northern California, 1991–2000. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103(3), 526–533.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Freedman, M. A., Gay, G. A., Brockert, J. E., Potrzebowski, P. W., & Rothwell, C. J. (1988). The 1989 revisions of the US Standard Certificates of Live Birth and Death and the US Standard Report of Fetal Death. American Journal of Public Health, 78(2), 168–172.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Justice, D. Common quality issues with revised birth certificate data. National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems, 2007 Annual Meeting 2007 June 6; Available at: URL: http://www.naphsis.org.

  12. Kirby, R. S. (2001). Invited commentary: Using vital statistics databases for perinatal epidemiology: Does the quality go in before the name goes on? American Journal of Epidemiology, 154(10), 889–890. doi:10.1093/aje/154.10.889.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Foley, M. M. An examination of the quality of birth certificate data in Pennsvylania. Temple University; 2005.

  14. Northam, S., Polancich, S., & Restrepo, E. (2003). Birth certificate methods in five hospitals. Public Health Nursing (Boston, Mass.), 20(4), 318–327. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1446.2003.20409.x.

  15. Smulian, J. C., Ananth, C. V., Hanley, M. L., Knuppel, R. A., Donlen, J., & Kruse, L. (2001). New Jersey’s electronic birth certificate program: Variations in data sources. American Journal of Public Health, 91(5), 814–816.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Land, G., & Vaughan, W. (1984). Birth certificate completion procedures and the accuracy of Missouri birth certificate data. Journal of the American Medical Record Association, 55(8), 31–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Starr, P., & Starr, S. (1995). Reinventing vital statistics. The impact of changes in information technology, welfare policy, and health care. Public Health Reports 110(5), 534–544.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirby, R. S., & Salihu, H. M. (2006). Back to the future? A critical commentary on the 2003 U.S. National standard certificate of live birth. Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 33(3), 238–244. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00109.x.

  19. Frost, F., Starzyk, P., George, S., & McLaughlin, J. F. (1984). Birth complication reporting: The effect of birth certificate design. American Journal of Public Health, 74(5), 505–506.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lydon-Rochelle, M. T., Holt, V. L., Cardenas, V., et al. (2005). The reporting of pre-existing maternal medical conditions and complications of pregnancy on birth certificates and in hospital discharge data. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 193(1), 125–134. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.096.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Saydah, S. H., Geiss, L. S., Tierney, E., Benjamin, S. M., Engelgau, M., & Brancati, F. (2004). Review of the performance of methods to identify diabetes cases among vital statistics, administrative, and survey data. Annals of Epidemiology, 14(7), 507–516. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2003.09.016.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yasmeen, S., Romano, P. S., Schembri, M. E., Keyzer, J. M., & Gilbert, W. M. (2006). Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 194(4), 992–1001. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.058.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Costakos, D. T., Love, L. A., & Kirby, R. S. (1998). The computerized perinatal database: Are the data reliable? American Journal of Perinatology, 15(7), 453–459.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. DiGiuseppe, D. L., Aron, D. C., Ranbom, L., Harper, D. L., & Rosenthal, G. E. (2002). Reliability of birth certificate data: A multi-hospital comparison to medical records information. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 6(3), 169–179. doi:10.1023/A:1019726112597.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dobie, S. A., Baldwin, L. M., Rosenblatt, R. A., Fordyce, M. A., Andrilla, C. H., & Hart, L. G. (1998). How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2(3), 145–154. doi:10.1023/A:1021875026135.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gore, D. C., Chez, R. A., Remmel, R. J., Harahan, M., Mock, M., & Yelverton, R. (2002). Unreliable medical information on birth certificates. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 47(4), 297–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. MacKay, A. P. (2002). Quality of California birth certificate medical data: A comparison with hospital discharge records. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 6525 Belcrest Rd, Hyattsville, MD 20782, 301 458–4358, anm3@cdc.gov.: American Public Health Association.

  28. Piper, J. M., Mitchel, E. F., Jr., Snowden, M., Hall, C., Adams, M., & Taylor P. (1993). Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records. American Journal of Epidemiology, 137(7), 758–768.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Reichman, N. E., & Hade, E. M. (2001). Validation of birth certificate data. A study of women in New Jersey’s HealthStart program. Annals of Epidemiology, 11(3), 186–193. doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(00)00209-X.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Roohan, P. J., Josberger, R. E., Acar, J., Dabir, P., Feder, H. M., & Gagliano, P. J. (2003). Validation of birth certificate data in New York State. Journal of Community Health, 28(5), 335–346. doi:10.1023/A:1025492512915.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zollinger, T. W., Przybylski, M. J., & Gamache, R. E. (2006). Reliability of Indiana birth certificate data compared to medical records. Annals of Epidemiology, 16(1), 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.03.005.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gould, J. B. (1999). Vital records for quality improvement. Pediatrics, 103(1 Suppl E), 278–290.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Clark, K., Fu, C. M., & Burnett, C. (1997). Accuracy of birth certificate data regarding the amount, timing, and adequacy of prenatal care using prenatal clinic medical records as referents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 145(1), 68–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Northam, S., & Knapp, T. R. (2006). The reliability and validity of birth certificates. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 35(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Parrish, K. M., Holt, V. L., Connell, F. A., Williams, B., & LoGerfo, J. P. (1993). Variations in the accuracy of obstetric procedures and diagnoses on birth records in Washington State. American Journal of Epidemiology, 138(2), 119–127.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Devlin, H. M., Desai, J., Holzman, G. S., & Gilbertson, D. T. (2008). Trends and disparities among diabetes complicated births in Minnesota, 1993–2003. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 59–62.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Thorpe, L. E., Berger, D., Ellis, J. A., et al. (2005). Trends and racial/ethnic disparities in gestational diabetes among pregnant women in New York City, 1990–2001. American Journal of Public Health, 95(9), 1536–1539.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hunt, K. J., & Conway, D. L. (2008). Who returns for postpartum glucose screening following gestational diabetes mellitus? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 198(4), 404–406.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Russell, M. A., Phipps, M. G., Olson, C. L., Welch, H. G., & Carpenter, M. W. (2006). Rates of postpartum glucose testing after gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 108(6), 1456–1462.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Smirnakis, K. V., Chasan-Taber, L., Wolf, M., Markenson, G., Ecker., J. L., & Thadhani, R. (2005). Postpartum diabetes screening in women with a history of gestational diabetes. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 106(6), 129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Minnesota Diabetes Program, Minnesota Department of Health, 85 E 7th Place, Suite 220, P.O. Box 64882, St. Paul, MN, 55164-0882, USA

    Heather M. Devlin, Jay Desai & Anne Walaszek

Authors
  1. Heather M. Devlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jay Desai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anne Walaszek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heather M. Devlin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Devlin, H.M., Desai, J. & Walaszek, A. Reviewing Performance of Birth Certificate and Hospital Discharge Data to Identify Births Complicated by Maternal Diabetes. Matern Child Health J 13, 660 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0390-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0390-9

Keywords

  • Gestational diabetes mellitus
  • Prepregnancy diabetes mellitus
  • Surveillance
  • Birth certificates
  • Hospital discharge data