Advertisement

Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 787–792 | Cite as

Knowing the Fetal Gender and its Relationship to Seeking Prenatal Care: Results from Jordan

  • Nemeh Ahmad Al-AkourEmail author
Article

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between knowing fetal gender and seeking prenatal care. Methods Four-hundred and eighty-four postpartum mothers identified before discharge from the maternity unit participated in this study. We collected data from the women using two sources: a demographic data questionnaire and reviews of hospital records. The number of prenatal care visits during pregnancy was determined to assess the adequacy of prenatal care. In the current study, we defined less-than-adequate prenatal care as less than nine prenatal care visits. Results The data showed that Jordanian women had a strong preference for male babies. The findings suggested that knowing the fetal gender was significantly related to the mean number (7.01 ± 2.75) of prenatal care visits by the mother. When the prenatal gender was known the mean number of prenatal care visits of women pregnant with male fetuses (8.91 ± 1.25) was significantly higher than that of female fetuses (5.32 ± 2.64). Knowledge of fetal gender may thus increase the risk of less-than-adequate care among pregnant women with female fetuses (52.7%) compared to male fetuses (29%). Conclusions Jordanian women had a strong preference for male babies. Given prenatal knowledge of the gender is related to adequate prenatal care seeking behavior.

Keywords

Gender preference Prenatal care Prenatal knowledge Fetal gender Jordan 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This research was funded by the Deanship of Research, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.

References

  1. 1.
    McDougall, J., DeWit, D., & Ebanks, G. (1999). Parental preferences for sex of children in Canada. Sex Roles, 41, 615–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li, N., Feldman, M., & Li, S. (2000). Cultural transmission in a demographic study of sex ratio at birth in China’s future. Theoretical Population Biology, 58, 161–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dahi, E., Beutel, M., Brosig, B., & Hinsch, K.-D. (2003). Preconception sex selection for non-medical reasons: A representative survey from Germany. Human Reproductive, 18, 2231–2234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Al-Zoubi, R. (1995). Ending gender disparities in the Arab World. Amman: Middle East and North Africa Regional Office, UNICEF.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Qutob, R., Mawajdeh, S., Allosh, R., Mehayer, H., & Majali., S. (2003). The effect of parental knowledge of fetal sex on birth weight: A study from Jordan. Health Care for Women International, 25, 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)- At a glance Jordan–Statisticshtm. At a glance: Jordan 2005 taken. Available at http://wwwindexmundicom/jordan/total_fertility_ratehtml taken on 31.1. 2007.
  7. 7.
    Blome-Jacobsen, L., Khoury, S., & Sromer, S. (1998). Children and youth: Jordanian society: Living conditions in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. Amman: FAFO Institute for Applied Social Science and Jordan Department of Statistics.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Widmer, K., McClelland, G., & Nickerson, C. (1981). Determining the impact of sex preferences on fertility: A demonstration study. Demography, 8, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Patel, V. (1989). Sex-determination and sex-preselection tests in India: Modern techniques for femicide. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 21, 1–11.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yi, Z., Ping, T., Baochang, G., Yi, X., Bohua, L., & Yongping, L. (1993). Causes and implications of the recent increase in the reported sex ratio at birth in China. Population and Development Review, 19, 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumm, J., Laland, K., & Feldman, M. (1994). Gene-culture coevolution and sex ratios: The effects of infanticide, sex- selective abortion, sex selection, and sex-biased parental investment on the evolytion of sex ratios. Theoretical Population Biology, 46, 249–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khalaf, I., & Callister, L. (1997). Cultural meanings of childbirth muslim women loving in Jordan. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 4, 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jacobsen, R., Moller, H., & Engholm, G. (1999). Fertility rates in Denmark in relation to the sexes of preceding children in family. Human Reproduction, 14, 1127–1130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peterson, C. C., & Peterson, J. L. (1973). Preference for sex of fetuses as a measure of change in sex attitudes. Psychology, 34, 3–5.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Teichman, Y., Rabinovitz, D., & Rabinovitz, Y. (1992). Gender Preferences of pregnant women and emotional reaction to information regarding fetal gender and postpartum: An examination of Freud’s view about motivation and motherhood. Sex Roles, 26, 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kotelchuck, M. (1994). The adequacy of prenatal care utilization index: Its distribution and association with low birth weight. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 1486–1489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ship, T., Ship, D., Bromley, B., Sheahan, R., Lieberman, C., & Benacerraf, B. (2004). What factors are associated with parents’ desire to know the sex of their unborn child? Birth, 31, 272–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Obermeyer, C., & Potter, J. (1990). Maternal health care utilzation in Jordan: A study of patterns and Determinanats. Studies in Family Planning, 22, 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Uited Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (1990) Sex differences in child survival and development. (Evaluation paper no.6). Amman: UNICEF’s Middle East and North Africa Regional Office.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gronzales, A., & Kooestner, R. (2005). Parental preference for sex of newborn as reflected in positive affect in Brtitish announcements. Sex Roles, 52, 407–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Coombs, C., Coombs, L., & McClelland, G. (1975). Preference scales for number and sex of children. Population studies, 29, 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maternal-Child Health Nursing Department, School of NursingJordan University of Science and Technology (JUST)IrbidJordan

Personalised recommendations