Objectives: Height and weight are key variables in epidemiologic research, including studies of reproductive outcomes. Optimally, this information is collected by trained study personnel. However, direct measurements are not always feasible. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of self-reported height and weight, as well as the resultant body mass index (BMI) calculated from self-reported height and weight (referred to as self-reported BMI), among a group of women of reproductive age according to select demographic variables.
Methods: A total of 381 women provided self-reported height, weight, and demographic information on a questionnaire for a study of contraceptive trends while attending a Family Medicine clinic. Height and weight were also abstracted from medical records for 275 of these study participants. Self-reported and measured values for height, weight, and BMI were compared using paired t-tests. Analysis of variance, chi-square tests, and Fisher’s Exact tests were used to examine how differences between self-reported and measured values varied by select demographic factors.
Results: Women underestimated weight by 4.6 pounds, overestimated height by 0.1 inches, and underestimated BMI by 0.8 kg/m2. All women, regardless of age, education, race/ethnicity, or marital status, underestimated their weight. These differences were statistically significant for all groups (p<0.01) with the exception of women with a high school education. Self-reported height and weight measures classified 84% of women into appropriate BMI categories.
Conclusions: Overall, self-reported height and weight were found to give an accurate representation of true BMI in this study. There were some demographic differences in the ability to accurately report height and weight, particularly with respect to race/ethnicity. Future studies should investigate these racial/ethnic differences among a larger population.
Body mass index Self-reported weight Height Validity
Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 2002;288:1723–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokdad AH, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, Bowman BA, Marks JS, Koplan JP. The spread of the obesity epidemic in the United States. JAMA 1999;282:1519–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokdad AH, Bowman BA, Ford ES, Vinicor F, Marks JS, Koplan JP. The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States. JAMA 2001;286:1195–1200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, Dietz WH, Vinicor F, Bales VS, Marks JS. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 2003;289:76–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institutes of Health. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: the evidence report. Obes Res 1998;6:S51–209.Google Scholar
Finkelstein EA, Fiebelkorn IC, Wang G. National medical spending attributable to overweight and obesity: how much, and who’s paying? Health Affairs Web Exclusive 2003;W3:219–26.Google Scholar
Stunkard AJ, Albaum JM. The accuracy of self-reported weights. Am J Clin Nutr 1981;34:1593–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Kuskowaska-Wolk A, Bergstrom R, Bostrom G. Relationship between questionnaire data and medical records of height, weight and body mass index. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1992;16:1–9.Google Scholar
Roberts RJ. Can self-reported data accurately describe the prevalence of overweight? Public Health 1995;109:275–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton-Smith C, Woodward M, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Morrison C. Accuracy of the estimated prevalence of obesity from self-reported height and weight in an adult Scottish population. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:143–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ. Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC-Oxford participants. Public Health Nutr 2002;5:561–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creinin MD, Roberts E. Body mass index, weight, and oral contraceptive risk. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:1492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rossouw K, Senekal M, Stander I. The accuracy of self-reported weight by overweight and obese women in an outpatient setting. Public Health Nutr 2001;4:19–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber LRB, Hogue CJ, Stein AD, Drews C, Zieman M, King J, Schayes S. Contraceptive use and discontinuation: Findings from the Contraceptive History, Initiation, and Choice Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:1290–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaadstra BM, Seidell JC, Van Noord PA, te Velde ER, Habbema JD, Vrieswijk B, et al. Fat and female fecundity: prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. BMJ 1993;306:484–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen TK, Scheike T, Keidigin N, Schaumburg I, Grandjean P. Fecundability in relation to body mass and menstrual cycle patterns. Epidemiology 1999;10:422–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolumar F, Olsen J, Rebagliato M, Saez-Lloret I, Bisanti L. Body mass index and delayed conception: a European multicenter study on infertility and subfecundity. Am J Epidemiol 2000;151:1072–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Rich-Edwards JW, Spiegelman D, Garland M, Hertzmark E, Hunter DJ, Colditz G, et al. Physical activity, body mass index, and ovulatory disorder infertility. Epidemiology 2002;13: 184–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner LR, Hogue CJ. The role of body weight in oral contraceptive failure: results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Ann Epidemiol 2005;15:492–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner Huber LR, Hogue CJ. The association between body weight, unintended pregnancy, and contraception at the time of conception. MCHJ 2005;4:413–20.Google Scholar
Brunner Huber LR, Hogue CJ, Stein AD, Drews C, Zieman M. Increasing body weight and risk of oral contraceptive failure: a case-cohort study in South Carolina. In press at Ann Epidemiol.Google Scholar