Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Relationship Between Birth Predictedness and Violence During Pregnancy Among Women in La Paz and El Alto, Bolivia

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: The main objectives were to estimate the prevalence of predicted and unpredicted last births using a prospective approach and to estimate the prevalence of violence during the last pregnancy. In addition, the relationship between birth predictedness and violence during pregnancy was examined. Methods: The target population for this study was women who had participated in the 1994 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) and lived in El Alto and La Paz Bolivia (n = 1308). In 1997, 816 women were located and re-interviewed. During this three-year interval, 127/816 women had given birth to their last child. Results: Of the last births that occurred during the three-year interval, 82% were unpredicted (18% were to women who stated in 1994 that they wanted to postpone childbirth for more than three years and 64% were to women who stated they wanted to wanted to forego childbearing entirely). Twenty-eight percent of women reported that they had experienced violence during their last pregnancy. No statistically significant relationship was found between birth predictedness and violence during their pregnancy. Conclusions: The majority of births that occurred in the three-year study interval were unpredicted. The prevalence of violence during pregnancy was alarmingly high among this sample of women. Further investigation on violence during pregnancy is needed and should be expanded to examine how violence during pregnancy impacts maternal and infant outcomes, which have remained poor in this country. In addition, the high rates of unpredicted births illustrate that work remains to be done in addressing women’s ability to control their fertility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campbell JN, Pugh LC, Campbell D, Visscher M. The influence of abuse on pregnancy. Women’s Health Issues 1995;5(4):214–23.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gazmararian JA, Adams MM, Saltzman LE, Johnson CH, Bruce FC, Markes JS, Zahniser SC, PRAMS Working Group. The relationship between pregnancy intendedness and physical violence in mothers of newborns. Obs Gynecol 1995;85(6):1031–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goodwin MM, Gazmararian JA, Johnson CH, Gilbert BC, Saltzman LE, The Prams Working Group. Pregnancy intendedness and physical abuse around the time of pregnancy: Findings from the pregnancy risk monitoring system, 1996–1997. Maternal Child Health J 2000;4(2):85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown SS, Eisenberg L. The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell AA, Mosher WD. A history of measurement of unintended pregnancies. Maternal Child Health J 2000;4(3):163–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kotch JB. Maternal and child health: Programs, problems and policy in public health. Gaithersburg, Maryland: Aspen Publishers, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sable M. Pregnancy intentions may not be a useful measure for research on maternal and child health outcomes. Fam Plann Persp 1999;31(5):249–50.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trussell J, Vaughan B, Stanford J. Are all contraceptive failures unintended pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey on Family Growth. Fam Plann Persp 1999;31(5):246–60.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Williams L, Abma J, Piccinino LJ. The correspondence between intention to avoid childbearing and subsequent fertility: A prospective analysis. Fam Plann Persp 1999;31(5):220–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vlassoff C. Fertility intentions and subsequent behavior: A longitudinal study in rural india. Stud Fam Plann 1990;21(4):216–25.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tan PC, Tey NP. Do fertility intentions predict subsequent behavior? Evidence from peninsular Malaysia. Stud Fam Plann 1994;25(4):222–31.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eggleston E. Determinants of unintended pregnancy among women in Ecuador. Int Fam Plan Persp 1999;25(1):27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Bolivia: Encuesta Nacional de Demografia y Salud 1998. Calverton, Maryland: Macro-International Inc., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Bolivia: Encuesta Nacional de Demografia y Salud 1994. Calverton, Maryland: Macro-International Inc., 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Camacho A., Bailey PE, Buchanan AM. Fertility regulation and its relationship to the stability of the couple, sexuality, and quality of life in Bolivia. Research Triangle Park, NC: Proyecto Integral de Salud and Family Health International, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Instituto Nacional De Estadísticasy Censos; Ministerio de Salud. Enuesta Nicaragüense de Demografía y Salud 1998. Calverton, Maryland: Macro-International Inc., 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ellsberg, M. Definiation, magnitude, and reproductive health sequelae of gender-based violence. Technical update: Gender-based violence and RH/HIV, Washington, DC, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gazmararian JA, Lazorick S, Spitz AM, Ballard TJ, Saltzman LE, Marks JS. Prevalence of violence against women during pregnancy. J Am Med Assoc 1996;275:1915–20.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gazmararian JA, Petersen R, Spitz AM, Goodwin MM, Saltzman LE, Marks JS. Violence and reproductive health: current knowledge and future research directions. Maternal Child Health J 2000;4(2):79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martin SL, Kilgallen B, Tsui AO, Maitra K, Singh KK, Kupper LL. Sexual behaviors and reproductive health outcomes: associations with abuse in India. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282(20):1967–72.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cokkinides VE, Coker AL. Experiencing physical violence during pregnancy: Prevalence and correlates. Fam Commun Health 1998;20(4):19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smikle CB, Sorme KA, Satin AJ, Hankins GD. Physical and sexual abuse in a middle-class obstetric population. South Med J 1996;89(10):983–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Helton AS. March of dimes protocol of care for the battered woman. White Plains, NY: March of Dimes, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Straus MA. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict tactics (CT) scales. J Marriage Fam 1979;41:75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hudson WW, Mcintosh SR. The assessment of spouse abuse: Two quantifiable dimensions. J Marriage Fam 1981;43:873–85.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Campbell JC. Nursing assessment for risk of homicide with battered women. Adv Nurs Sci 1986;8(4):36–51.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Petersen R, Gazmararian JA, Spitz AM, Rowley DL, Goodwin MM, Saltzman LE, Marks JS. Violence and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A review of the literature and directions of future research. Am J Prev Med 1997;13(5):366–73.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Petersen R, Saltzman LE, Goodwin M, et al. Key scientific issues for research on violence occurring around the time of pregnancy. Atlanta, Ga: Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Martin SL, Clark KA, Lynch SR, Kupper LL, Cilenti D. Violence in the lives of pregnant teenage women: Associations with multiple substance use. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1999;25(3):425–40.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Amaro H, Fried LE, Cabral H, Zuckerman B. Violence during pregnancy and substance use. Am J Public Health 1990;80(5):575–79.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Campbell JC, Poland ML, Waller JB, Ager J. Correlates of battering during pregnancy. Res Nurs Health 1992;15(3):219–26.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Finklehor D, Browne A. The traumatic impact of child sexual abuse: a conceptualization. J Orthopsychiatry 1985;55(4):530–41.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nájera Polo T, Bailey PE, McCarraher DR. Actividades economicas de la mujeres, fecundidad y anticoncepción: Seguimiento de la Encuesta Nacional de Demografia y Salud 1994. La Paz, Bolivia: Family Health International, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nájera Polo, T, Bailey PE, McCarraher DR. Actividades Economicas de las Mujeres, Fecundidad y Anticoncepcion: Seguimiento de La Encuesta Nacional de Demografia y Salud 1994. La Paz, Bolivia: Family Health International, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stata Statistical Software: Release 7.0 Stata Corp College Station, TX: Stata Corporation; 2001.

  36. Population Reference Bureau 2002 Women of World. Washington, DC: 2002.

  37. Population Reference Bureau 2001 World Population Data. Washington, DC: 2001.

  38. Evins G, Chescheir N. Prevalence of domestic violence among women seeking abortion services. Womens Health Issues 1996 Jul–1996 Aug 31;6(4):204–10.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Glander SS, Moore ML, Michielutte R, Parsons LH. The prevalence of domestic violence among women seeking abortion. Obs Gynecol 1998;91(6):1002–6.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Capozza K. Clandestine Abortions Kill Women. Bolivian Times (Laz Paz, Bolivia) 1998.

  41. Rance S, Olivares C. Mitos y Realidades: El Aborto en Bolivia. La Paz, Bolivia: The Population Council, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  42. McCarraher DR, Bailey PE, Martin SL. The influence of pill-related partner violence on covert pill use and pill discontinuation among women living in La Paz, El Alto, and Santa Cruz, Bolivia. 2004. Submitted to J BioSoc Sci.

  43. McCarraher DR, Bailey PE, Martin SL. Are reproductive health services a good place to screen for intimate partner violence? Evidence from Bolivia. Violence Against Women 2002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Family Health International, Durham, North Carolina

    Donna R. McCarraher

  2. Family Health International, Durham, North Carolina

    Patricia E. Bailey MCH

  3. Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

    Sandra L. Martin

  4. Senior Research Associate, Family Health International, 2224 E NC 54 Durham, North Carolina, 27709

    Donna R. McCarraher

Authors
  1. Donna R. McCarraher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patricia E. Bailey MCH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sandra L. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna R. McCarraher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCarraher, D.R., Bailey, P.E. & Martin, S.L. The Relationship Between Birth Predictedness and Violence During Pregnancy Among Women in La Paz and El Alto, Bolivia. Matern Child Health J 9, 101–112 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-005-2453-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-005-2453-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation