Putonghua as “admission ticket” to linguistic market in minority regions in China
This article reports on a multiple-case study that investigates the impact of the promotion of Putonghua on individuals’ social interactions and language identities in multilingual minority regions in China. Drawing on the theory of linguistic market, the study focuses on what mediates individuals’ access to the linguistic market. The 24 participants, from multilingual minority regions of Xinjiang, Tibet, and Inner Mongolia in China, had different linguistic repertoires (monolingual vs. bilingual), and lived in different sociolinguistic contexts where Putonghua or minority language dominates. Data were collected through prolonged, semi-structured interviews and workplace observations. The analysis of data revealed the complex interrelations between people’s language competence as linguistic capital, their exchange of and investment in such capital, and the formation and transformation of their identities. The study also uncovers the role of Putonghua as a high-status language in providing or prohibiting access of other linguistic capitals to the linguistic market, depending on the individual’s competence in Putonghua. In other words, competence in Putonghua serves as the “admission ticket” to the linguistic market, without which the linguistic capitals from other languages cannot be allowed in and exchanged. Therefore, it is important for policy makers to seriously reconsider the statuses of minority languages since Putonghua serves a managing role in the linguistic market.
KeywordsLinguistic market Linguistic capital Language identity Multilingual context Promotion of Putonghua Mainland China
This work was supported by a 2016 Major Project for MOE Key Research Centers for Humanities and Social Sciences [number 16JJD740002], and an earlier version of the paper was presented at the American Association for Applied Linguistics 2017 Conference in Portland. I am tremendously grateful to Professor Xuesong Gao for his persistent encouragement throughout the process of writing as well as his valuable suggestions on the theoretical positioning of the study. I also wholeheartedly thank the reviewers for their highly constructive and informative comments and suggestions.
- Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Revised ed.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Annamalai, E. (2000). Use of language rights by minorities. In R. Phillipson (Ed.), Right to language: Equity, power and education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Bianco, J. L., Orton, J., & Gao, Y. (Eds.). (2009). China and English: Globalisation and the dilemmas of identity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
- Cooper, R. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Davies, A. (2003). The native speaker: Myth and reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matter.Google Scholar
- Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- He, S. (2017). Fangqi muyu de quanli: Yuyan zhengce yu guihua weidu de sikao [The right of giving up the mother tongue: a language policy perspective]. Yuyan Zhanlüe Yanjiu [Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning], 2(1), 83–91.Google Scholar
- Laitin, D. (1998). Identity in formation: The Russian populations in the near abroad. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education. (2012). English curriculum standards for compulsory education (2011). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.Google Scholar
- Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. London: Longman.Google Scholar
- Norton, B. (2001). Non-participation, imagined communities, and the language classroom. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 159–171). Harlow, England: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Petrovic, J. E. (2015). A post-liberal approach to language policy in education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Schiffman, H. F. (Ed.). (2012). Language policy and language conflict in Afghanistan and its neighbors: The changing politics of language choice. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
- Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Standing Committee of People’s Congress of China. (2000). The national common language and writing law. Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/ziliao/flfg/2005-08/31/content_27920.htm. Accessed 30 Aug 2017.
- Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar