Advertisement

Language Policy

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 365–384 | Cite as

What counts as language education policy? Developing a materialist Anti-racist approach to language activism

  • Nelson FloresEmail author
  • Sofia Chaparro
Original Paper

Abstract

Language activism has been at the core of language education policy since its emergence as a scholarly field in the 1960s under the leadership of Joshua Fishman. In this article, we seek to build on this tradition to envision a new approach to language activism for the twenty-first century. In particular, we advocate a materialist anti-racist approach to language activism that broadens what counts as language education policy to include a focus on the broader racial and economic policies that impact the lives of language-minoritized communities. In order to illustrate the need for a materialist anti-racist framing of language education policy we provide portraits of four schools in the School District of Philadelphia that offer dual language bilingual education programs. We demonstrate the ways that larger societal inequities hinder these programs from serving the socially transformative function that advocates for these programs aspire toward. We end by calling for a new paradigm of language education policy that connects language activism with other movements that seek to address societal inequities caused by a myriad of factors including poverty, racism, and xenophobia.

Keywords

Materialist anti-racism Language education policy Language activism Bilingual education Philadelphia 

References

  1. Anyon, J. (2005). What counts as educational policy? Notes toward a new paradigm. Harvard Educational Review, 75(1), 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bale, J. (2015). Language policy and global political economy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), Language policy and political economy: English in a global context (pp. 72–96). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Block, D. (2014). Social class in applied linguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Block, D. (2015). Social class in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, B., & Richardson, K. (1993). Ethics, advocacy and empowerment. Issues of method in language research. Language & Communication, 13(2), 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching? The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 103–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cucchiara, M. (2013). Marketing schools, marketing cities: Who wins and loses when schools become urban amenities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eckert, P. (1980). Diglossia: Separate and unequal. Linguistics, 18(11/12), 1053–1064.Google Scholar
  10. Fishman, J. (1967). Bilingualism with and without diglossia; diglossia with and without bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues, 23(2), 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fishman, J. (1976). Bilingual education: An international sociological perspective. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Fishman, J. (1991). Reversing language shift. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  13. Fishman, J., & Lovas, J. (1973). Bilingual education in sociolinguistic perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 4(3), 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitts, S. (2006). Reconstructing the status quo: LinguisticiInteraction in a dual-language school. Bilingual Research Journal, 30(2), 337–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, R. (2000). Contextual challenge to dual-language education: A case study of a developing middle school program. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 31(2), 202–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galster, G., & Santiago, A. (1994). Explaining the growth of Puerto Rican poverty, 1970–1980. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 3(2), 249–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. García, O. (2013). From diglossia to transglossia: Bilingual and multilingual classrooms in the 21st century. In C. Abello-Contesse, P. Chandler, M. Lopez-Jimenez, & R. Chacón-Beltrán (Eds.), Bilingual and multilingual education in the 21st Century (pp. 155–175). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. García, O., & Kleyn, T. (Eds.). (2016). Translanguaging with multilingual children: Learning from classroom moments. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harvey, D. (2003). The new imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hill, P., Campbell, C., Menefee-Libey, D., Dusseault, B., DeArmond, M., & Gross, B. (2009). Portfolio school districts for big cities: An interim report. Seattle: Center on Reinventing Public Education.Google Scholar
  23. Holborow, M. (2015). Language and neoliberalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Hornberger, N. H. (1988). Bilingual education and language maintenance. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hornberger, N. H. (2010). Introduction: Can schools save indigenous languages? Policy and practice on four continents. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Can schools save indigenous languages? Policy and practice on four continents (pp. 1–14). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Hornberger, N. H. (2013). Negotiating methodological rich points in the ethnography of language policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 219, 101–122.Google Scholar
  27. Hornberger, N. H. (2014). On not taking language inequality for granted: Hymesian traces in ethnographic monitoring in South Africa’s multilingual language policy. Mulitlingua, 33(5/6), 623–645.Google Scholar
  28. Hymes, D. (1980). Language in education: Ethnolinguistic essays. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, D., & Ricento, T. (2013). Conceptual and theoretical perspectives in language planning and policy: Situating the ethnography of language policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 219, 7–21.Google Scholar
  30. King, K. (2001). Language revitalization processes and prospects: Quichua in the Ecuadorian Andes. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  31. Klak, T. (2014). Globalization, neoliberalism and economic change in Central America and the Caribbean. In R. Gwynne & C. Kay (Eds.), Latin America transformed: Globalization and modernity (pp. 67–92). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Leonardo, Z. (2012). The race for class: Reflections on a critical raceclass theory of education. Educational Studies, 48(5), 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lipman, P., & Hursh, D. (2007). Renaissance 2010: The reassertion of ruling class power through neoliberal policies in Chicago. Policy Futures in Education, 5(2), 160–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCarty, T. (2002). A place to be Navajo: Rough Rock and the struggle for self-determination in indigenous schooling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. McCollum, P. (1999). Learning to value English: Cultural capital in a two-way bilingual program. Bilingual Research Journal, 23(2–3), 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Melamed, J. (2011). Represent and destroy: Rationalizing violence in the new racial capitalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Menken, K., & García, O. (Eds.). (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Palmer, D. (2009). Middle-class English speakers in a two-way immersion bilingual classroom : “Everybody should be listening to jonathan right now….”. TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Palmer, D. (2010). Race, power, and equity in a multiethnic urban elementary school with a dual language “strand” program. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 41(1), 94–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pennycook, A. (2015). Class is out: Erasing social class in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Petrovic, J. (2005). The conservative restoration and neoliberal defenses of bilingual education. Language Policy, 4(4), 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Piller, I., & Cho, J. (2013). Neoliberalism as language ideology. Language in Society, 42(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ricento, T. (2015). Political economy and English as a “global” language. In T. Ricento (Ed.), Language policy and political economy (pp. 27–47). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ricento, T., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sanchez, C. (2013, November 21). Kids pay the price in fighting over fixing Philadelphia schools. National Public Radio. www.npr.org/2013/11/21/246193561/kids-pay-the-price-in-fight-over-fixing-philadelphia-schools
  48. Saxena, M. (2014). “Critical diglossia” and “lifestyle diglossia”: Development and the interaction between multilingualism, cultural diversity and English. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 225, 91–112.Google Scholar
  49. Scanlan, M., & Palmer, D. (2009). Race, power, and (in)equity within two-way immersion settings. The Urban Review, 41(5), 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. School District of Philadelphia (2014). School reform commission receives 40 applications for new charters. http://thenotebook.org/
  51. Shamlin, W. (2013, October 13). Students feel effects of doomsday budget. The Philadelphia Tribune. www.phillytrib.com.
  52. Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2003). Legal discourse and decisions, teacher policymaking and the multilingual classroom: Constraining and supporting Khmer/English biliteracy in the United States. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6(3/4), 168–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steinberg, M. & Quinn, R. (2014). An urban myth? New evidence on equity, adequacy, and the efficiency of educational resources in Pennsylvania. CPRE Policy Brief. Google Scholar
  54. Tollefson, J. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  55. Vaish, V. (2007). Bilingualism without diglossia: The Indian community in Singapore. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(2), 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Valdés, G. (1997). Dual language immersion programs: A cautionary note concerning the education of language-minority students. Harvard Educational Review, 67(3), 391–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van der Aa, J., & Blommaert, J. (2011). Ethnographic monitoring: Hymes’s unfinished business in educational research. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 42(4), 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weaver, T. (2012). Neoliberalism in the trenches: Urban policy and politics in the United States and the United Kingdom (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  60. Weber, J. (2015). Language racism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whalen, C. (2001). From Puerto Rico to Philadelphia: Puerto Rican workers and post-war economies. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations