Advertisement

Language Policy

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 561–580 | Cite as

Multilingual language policy and mother tongue education in Timor-Leste: a multiscalar approach

  • Jo CafferyEmail author
  • Gabriela Coronado
  • Bob Hodge
Original Paper

Abstract

This article looks at multilingual, mother-tongue-based language policies influenced by colonial and postcolonial histories and globalization processes. We use multiscalar analysis to show these policies as creative responses to problems affected by national and international forces. Our study focuses on Timor-Leste, specifically a pilot mother-tongue-based multilingual education program. We analyse the program’s practices and successful outcomes, in the adverse circumstances of this small, impoverished, recently independent nation, as it attempts to manage high levels of linguistic diversity (16 mother tongues and a five-language destination system) through multilingual education. We also identify tensions and problems that impinge on the outcomes for this ambitious program. Despite the obstacles, Timor-Leste’s multiscalar multilingual literacy policy is an important case that reinforces the significance of mother tongue education as a response to global complexity. The pilot program provides valuable lessons for many other parts of the world with similar problems, particularly for nations with comparable colonial histories.

Keywords

Language policy Timor Leste Multilingual education Multiscalar Tetun Galolen Fataluku 

References

  1. Agnew, J. (2003). Geopolitics: Revisioning world politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Asher, J. J. (1969). The total physical response approach to second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 53(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, J. (2010). Enhancing learning of children from diverse language backgrounds: Mother tongue-based bilingual or multilingual education in early childhood and early primary school years. Early Childhood Development Intercultural Partnerships: University of Victoria.Google Scholar
  4. Benson, C. (2004). Bilingual schooling in Mozambique and Bolivia: From experimentation to implementation. Language Policy, 3, 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benson, C. (2005). The importance of mother tongue based schooling for educational quality. Commissioned Study for EFA Global Monitoring Report. The Quality Imperative. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001466/146632e.pdf
  6. Benson, C. (2010). How multilingual African contexts are pushing educational research and practice in new directions. Language and Education, 24(4), 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blommaert, J., & Rampton, B. (2012). Language and superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
  9. CARE. (2012). Baseline report mother tongue-based multilingual education in Timor-Leste pilot project. Internal document.Google Scholar
  10. Caffery, J. Coronado, G. Hodge, B. & Taylor-Leech, K. (2014). The timor-leste mother tongue based multilingual education pilot project: A strategic evaluation. Report presented to UNESCO National Commission for Education, Timor-Leste. http://www.canberra.edu.au/researchrepository/items/bc3d88bd-1ab1-4452-b7b6-64c49ca6fb45/1/
  11. Census Atlas. (2013). Timor-Leste Population and Housing Census Atlas 2010 Vol 15. National Statistics Directorate (NSD) & United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Dili, RDTL.Google Scholar
  12. Census Highlights. (2010). Highlights of the 2010 main results in Timor-Leste. http://www.statistics.gov.tl/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/English_20Census_20Summary_202011.pdf
  13. Coronado, G. (1999). Porque hablar dos idiomas… es como saber más. Sistemas comunicativos bilingües ante el México plural. México: CIESAS.Google Scholar
  14. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  15. Cummins, J. (2005). A proposal for action: Strategies for recognizing heritage language competence as a learning resource within the mainstream classroom. Modern Language Journal, 89(4), 585–591.Google Scholar
  16. De Swaan, A. (2001). Words of the world: The global language system. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  17. Fataluku Language Project (n.d.) Languages of East Timor. http://www.fataluku.com/languages/. Viewed 10 March 2015.
  18. Ferreira da Silva, G. (1999). Language as an Index of National Identity. The case of East Timor. In G. Hull & L. Eccles (Eds.), Studies in languages and cultures of East Timor, Vol. 2. Academy of East Timor studies (pp. 8–13). Sydney: University of Western Sydney, Macarthur.Google Scholar
  19. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  20. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of culture. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Godenzzi, J. C. (2001). La educación bilingüe intercultural en el Perú. Lexis, XXV(1–2), 299–318.Google Scholar
  22. Heugh, K. (2010). Productive engagement with linguistic diversity in tension with globalised discourses in Ethiopia. Current Issues in Language Planning, 11(4), 378–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hodge, B., & Matthews, I. (2011). Complexity theory and engaged research. Continuum, 25(6), 887–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hull, G. (1999). East Timor and Indonesia. The cultural factors of incompatibiliy. In G. Hull & L. Eccles (Eds.), Studies in languages and cultures of East Timor, Vol. 2. Academy of East Timor studies (pp. 55–67). Sydney: University of Western Sydney, Macarthur.Google Scholar
  25. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Lewis, M. P., Simons, G. F. & Fennig, C. D. (Eds.) (2014). Ethnologue: Languages of the world, seventeenth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. http://www.ethnologue.com
  27. Lopes, S. (Ed.) (2012). Timor-Leste em Números, 2012. Timor-Leste in Figures, 2012. Direcção Geral de Estatística. Dili, Timor Leste.Google Scholar
  28. Malone, S. (2007). Mother tongue-based multilingual education: Implications for education policy. In A paper presented at the seminar on education policy and the right to education: Towards more equitable outcomes for South Asia‘s Children, Kathmandu, pp. 17–20.Google Scholar
  29. Malone, S. (2013). Teachers’ activity guide for grade 1. Timor-Leste MTB-MLE Program. Timor-Leste National Commission for UNESCO.Google Scholar
  30. Ministry of Education. (2008). National education policy 2007–2012: Building our nation through quality education. Dili: Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (RDTL), National Statistics Directorate (NSD) & United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).Google Scholar
  31. NSD & UNFPA. (2012). Education monograph: Timor-Leste population and housing census 2010. Analytical report on education. Vol. 9, National Statistics and National Statistics Directorate (NSD)/Direcção Nacional de Estatística (DNE)/United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA): Timor-Leste. http://www.laohamutuk.org/DVD/DGS/Cens10/9Education.pdf
  32. Pennycook, A. (2007). Global Englishes and transcultural flows. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Piller, I. (2010). Intercultural communication. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Piller, I., & Hyuncho, J. (2013). Neoliberalism as language policy. Language in Society, 42, 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quinn, M. (2013). Talking to learn in Timorese classrooms. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26(2), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rampton, B, Maybin, J. & Roberts, C. (2014) Methodological foundations in linguistic ethnography. Tilburg, Tilburg papers in cultural studies 102.Google Scholar
  37. Sassen, S. (2003). Globalization or denationalization? Review of International Politicql Economy, 10(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Simpson, J., Caffery, J. & McConvell, P. (2009). Gaps in Australia’s indigenous language policy: Dismantling bilingual education in the Northern Territory. AIATSIS discussion paper number 24. AIATSIS. Canberra. www.aiatsis.gov.au/research_program/publications/discussion_papers
  39. Stanley, E. (2008). Torture, truth and justice: The case of Timor-Leste. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Stringer, M. D. (1987). Pre-school literacy in the Enga Province using the Multi-Strategy method. Port Moresby, PNG: Division of Education Research. The National Research Institute.Google Scholar
  41. Stringer, M. D. (2006). Literacy acquisition and diffusion among preliterate adults: Effects of two methods of instruction in non-industrialised communities in Papua New Guinea.SIL E-Books 2. SIL International. http://www.sil.org/silepubs/pubs/47752/47752_stringer%20m_literacy%20acquisition.pdf
  42. Taylor-Leech, K. (2013). Finding space for non-dominant languages in education: Language policy and medium of instruction in Timor-Leste 2000–2012. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(10), 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. TLNCU (Timor-Leste National Commission for UNESCO) Ministry of Education. (2010). Mother tongue-based multilingual education for Timor-Leste: National policy. [English version]. Dili, RDTL. http://www.scribd.com/doc/49147952/MOTHER-TONGUE-BASED-MULTILINGUAL-EDUCATION-FOR-TIMOR-LESTE-NATIONAL-POLICY#scribd
  44. UNESCO. (2000). The Dakar framework for action. Education for all: Meeting our collective commitments. Adopted by the World Education Forum. Dakar, Senegal, 26–28 April 2000. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001211/121147e.pdf
  45. UNESCO & UNICEF. (2013). Asia-Pacific end of decade notes on education for all. Early Childhood Care and Education. UNESCO Bangkok, UNICEF EAPRO and UNICEF ROSA. http://www.ungei.org/files/End_Decade_Note_-_Education_for_All_.pdf
  46. Young, C. (2002). First language first literacy education for the future in a multilingual Philippine society. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 5(4), 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Young, C. (2003). First language: A foundation for effective basic education. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 34(1), 123–131.Google Scholar
  48. Young, C. (2005). First language education: Quality education for all. In D. Dayag & S. Quakenbush (Eds.), Linguistics and language education in the Philippines and beyond. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Education, Science, Technology and MathematicsUniversity of CanberraCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Institute for Culture and SocietyWestern Sydney UniversityPenrith SouthAustralia

Personalised recommendations