Skip to main content

Language management: a snapshot of governmentality within the private schools in Quetta, Pakistan

Abstract

Pakistan is a multilingual and multiethnic country; however, this diversity stands unrecognized in the formal language-in-education policies. Estimates suggest that about 90 % of children who speak over 60 indigenous languages do not have access to education in their mother tongues. Linguists estimate that exclusive teaching of Urdu and English subjects the indigenous languages to physical endangerment as well as negative perceived vitality. This study investigated the language management techniques, practices and discourses of the school authorities about indigenous languages and linguistic diversity, and its effects on perceptions of the students. The study used the theoretical framework of governmentality as introduced by Foucault in The foucault effect: studies in governmentality with two lectures by and an interview with Michael Foucault, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, (1991), which not only focuses on the direct acts of the governing of the state apparatuses, but also addresses the indirect acts of governance that shape individual behaviors. Deploying a mixed methodology that used students of high secondary level, teachers and school principals as sampling in 11 low-fee English-medium private schools in Quetta, Pakistan, the findings suggest that school authorities exercise stringent techniques such as notices, wall paintings, penalties and occasional punishment to suppress the use of languages other than Urdu or English. Mostly, the students also show compliance to the top-down policies. Most of participants perceive indigenous languages as worthless because of their lesser role in professional development and social mobility. The study concludes that the governance methods displace the indigenous languages both physically as well as perceptually. The prevailing orientations look upon languages as commodities, profoundly downgrading the cultural, literary, aesthetic and sociolinguistic dynamics of the indigenous languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Andrabi, T., Das, J., & Khwaja, A. I. (2008). A dime a day: The possibilities and limits of private schooling in Pakistan. Comparative Education Review, 52(3), 329–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayres, A. (2003). The politics of language policy in Pakistan. In M. E. Brown & Š. Ganguly (Eds.), Fighting words: Language policy and ethnic relations in Asia (pp. 51–80). Cambridge: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ayres, A. (2009). Speaking like a state: Language and nationalism in Pakistan. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Benson, C. J. (2013). Towards adopting a multilingual habitus in educational development. In C. Benson & K. Kosonen (Eds.), Language issues in comparative education (pp. 1–16): Springer.

  5. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Canagarajah, S. (2005). Reclaiming the local in language policy and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  8. Coleman, H. (2010). Teaching and learning in Pakistan: The role of language in education. Islamabad Pakistan: The British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Durrani, M. (2012). Banishing colonial specters: Language ideology and education policy in Pakistan. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 27(1), 29–49.

  12. Ethnologue. (2014). Languages of the World. Retrieved July 20, 2014, from https://www.ethnologue.com/statistics/country.

  13. Ettlinger, N. (2011). Governmentality as epistemology. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(3), 537–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fimyar, O. (2008). Using governmentality as a conceptual tool in education policy research. Educate (special issue), 3–8.

  15. Fishman, J. A. (1979). Bilingual education, language planning, and English. English World-Wide, 1, 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Foucault, M. (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality with two lectures by and an interview with Michael Foucault. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (2nd Vintage Books ed.). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Foucault, M. (2000). The subject and power. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Essential works of foucault (Vol. 3, pp. 326–348). New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Foucault, M. (2009). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France : 1977–78. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  21. García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  22. García, O., Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Torres-Guzman, M. E. (2006). Imagining multilingual schools: Languages in education and globalization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  23. GOP. (2001). Census. Islamabad Pakistan: Retrieved from http://www.pbs.gov.pk/.

  24. Haugen, E., & Dil, A. S. (1972). The ecology of language. Essays… Selected and introduced by Anwar S. Dil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Heyneman, S. P., & Stern, J. M. B. (2013). Low cost private schools for the poor: What public policy is appropriate? International Journal of Educational Development, 35, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hornberger, N. H. (2003). Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research, and practice in multilingual settings. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hussain, K. (2013). Rethinking education: Critical discourse and society. Islamabad Pakistan: Narrative Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jalal, A. (1995). Democracy and authoritarianism in South Asia: A comparative and historical perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Jinnah, M. A. (2000). Jinnah: Speeches and statements 1947–1948. Karachi Pakistan: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Khurshid, N. K. (2009). Language education in Pakistan: A postcolonial analysis masters of education, critical studies. New Brunswick: The University of New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mahboob, A. (2002). No English, no future: Language policy in Pakistan. In S. O. B. Hartford (Ed.), Political independence with linguistic servitude: The politics about languages in the developing world (p. 1042). New York: NOVA Science.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Manan, S. A., & David, M. K. (2013). Mapping ecology of literacies in educational setting: The case of local mother tongues vis-à-vis urdu and english languages in Pakistan. Language and Education, 28(3), 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Manan, S. A., David, M. K., & Dumanig, F. P. (forthcoming). Ethnolinguistic dilemma and static maintenance syndrome: A study of languages policies and language perceptions in Pakistan. Language Problems and Language Planning.

  35. Mansoor, S. (1993). Punjabi, urdu, english in Pakistan: A sociolinguistic study. Lahore: Vanguard.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mansoor, S. (2004a). The medium of instruction dilemma: Implications for language planning in higher education. In S. Mansoor, S. Meraj, & A. Tahir (Eds.), Language policy, planning, and practice: A South Asian perspective. Karachi: Agha Khan University.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mansoor, S. (2004b). The status and role of regional languages in higher education in Pakistan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25(4), 333–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mansoor, S. (2005). Language planning in higher education: A case study of Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. May, S. (2001). Language and minority rights. London: Pearson Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  40. May, S. (2005). Language rights: Moving the debate forward. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 319–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. May, S. (2006). Language policy and minority rights. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 255–272). Malden, Mass: Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  42. McCarty, T. L. (2009). Empowering indigenous languages: What can be learned from native American experiences? In R. P. T. Skutnabb-Kangas, A. K. Mohanty, & M. Panda (Eds.), Linguistic diversity and language rights: Social justice through multilingual education (pp. 125–139). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Menken, K., & García, O. (2010). Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mohanty, A. K. (2010). Languages, inequality and marginalization: Implications of the double divide in Indian multilingualism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 205, 131–154.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mustafa, Z. (2011). Tyranny of language in education, the problems and its solutions. Karachi: Ushba Publishing International.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Muzaffar, I., & Sharma, A. (2011). Public-private debates in education: Whither private without a public? J-SAPS, 1.

  47. Niesche, R. (2013). Governmentality and my school: school principals in societies of control. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1–13.

  48. Pattanayak, D. P. (1998). Mother tongue: An Indian context. In R. Singh (Ed.), The native speaker: Multilingual perspectives (pp. 124–147). New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, N.J.; London: L. Erlbaum.

  50. Pennycook, A. (2002). Language policy and docile bodies: Hong Kong and governmentality. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 91–110): Mahwah NJ Erlbaum.

  51. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. New York; London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Phillipson, R., & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1996). English only worldwide or language ecology? TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 429–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pinnock, H. (2009). Language and education: The missing link, how the language used in schools threatens the achievement of education for all. UK: Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rahman, T. (1996). Language and politics in Pakistan. Karachi; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rahman, T. (1997). The medium of instruction controversy in Pakistan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 18(2), 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Rahman, T. (1999). Language, education, and culture. Karachi Pakistan: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rahman, T. (2002). Language, ideology and power: Language learning among the Muslims of Pakistan and North India. Karachi; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Rahman, T. (2004). Denizens of alien worlds: A study of education, inequality and polarization in Pakistan. Oxford; Karachi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rahman, T. (2005a). Language policy, multilingualism and language vitality in Pakistan. In A. Saxena & L. Borin (Eds.), Lesser-known languages of South Asia—status and policies, case studies and applications of information technology (pp. 73–106). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rahman, T. (2005b). Passports to privilege: The English-medium schools in Pakistan. Peace and Democracy in South Asia, 1(1), 24–44.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ramanathan, V. (2005). The English-Vernacular divide: Postcolonial language politics and practice: Multilingual Matters.

  63. Rassool, N., & Mansoor, S. (2007). Contemporary issues in language, education and development in Pakistan. In N. Rassool (Ed.), Global issues in language, education and development: Perspectives from postcolonial countries (pp. 218–244). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ricento, T. K., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Shamim, F. (2012). English as the language for development in Pakistan: Issues, challenges and possible solutions. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Language and development: Africa and beyond (pp. 97–118). Addis Ababa Ethiopia: The British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Shohamy, E. G. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches: Abingdon: Routledge.

  68. Siddiqui, S. (2012). Education, inequalities and freedom: A sociopolitical critique. Islamabad: Narratives Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide in education, or worldwide diversity and human rights? Mahwah, N.J.; London: L. Erlbaum Associates.

  70. Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Spolsky, B. (2009). Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  72. Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Tollefson, J. W. (2006). Critical theory in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 42–59). Malden, Mass: Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Torwali, Z. (2014). The beauty of diversity, The news international. Retrieved from http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-9-242741-The-beauty-of-diversity.

  75. UNESCO. (1995). The use of the Vernacular in Education. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  76. UNESCO. (2014). Language vitality and endangerment Retrieved February 26, 2013, from http://www.unesco.org/culture/.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed Abdul Manan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manan, S.A., David, M.K. & Dumanig, F.P. Language management: a snapshot of governmentality within the private schools in Quetta, Pakistan. Lang Policy 15, 3–26 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9343-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Governmentality
  • Language management
  • English
  • Urdu
  • Indigenous languages
  • Pakistan