Skip to main content
Log in

Normative language policy: interface and interfences

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Language Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emerging interdisciplinary work in language politics and language policy and planning studies demonstrates a rising interest among researchers in the interface between sociolinguistics, political science and philosophy. Much of the resulting cross-disciplinary work, however, tends to focus on the subject matters (politics, language) themselves rather than explore the broader issues that transpire from working in the interface between distinct fields of academic inquiry. Reflecting on the meaning of interdisciplinary work in LPP, I examine the interface and internal fences between sociolinguistics and political philosophy as fields of inquiry. I then move on to consider the way(s) in which “thinking linguistically” and “thinking politically” may be advantageously combined in the fundamentally interdisciplinary terrain of normative language policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archibugi, D. (2005). The languages of democracy: Vernacular or Esperanto? A comparison between the multiculturalist and cosmopolitan perspectives. Political Studies, 53(3), 537–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastardas-Boada, A. (2013). Language policy and planning as an interdisciplinary field: Towards a complexity approach”. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(3–04), 363–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carens, J. (2000). Culture, citizenship, and community: A contextual exploration of justice as evenhandedness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • De Schutter, H. (2007). Language policy and political philosophy: On the emerging linguistic justice debate. Language problems and language planning, 31(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elllis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Language as a complex adaptive system. London: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeden, M. (2013). The political theory of political thinking: The anatomy of a practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frodeham, R., Klein, J. T., & Mitcham, C. (2010). The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadorn, G. H., Hoffman-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Phol, C., et al. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of interdisciplinary research. Springer and the Swiss Academy of Arts and Sciences.

  • Ives, P. (2010). Cosmopolitanism and global English: Language politics in globalisation debates. Political Studies, 58(3), 516–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (1991). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, practice. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2004). Interdisciplinarity and complexity: An evolving relationship. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 6(1–2), 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. T. (2005). Humanities, culture, and interdisciplinarity: The changing American academy. Albany: New York State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., & Patten, A. (2003). Introduction: Language rights and political theory: Contexts, issues and approaches. In W. Kymlicka & A. Patten (Eds.), Language rights and political theory (pp. 1–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massip-Bonnet, A., & Bastardas-Boada, A. (Eds.). (2013). Complexity perspectives on language, communication and society. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, S. (2003). Misconceiving minority language rights: Implications for liberal political theory. In W. Kymlicka & A. Patten (Eds.), Language rights and political theory (pp. 13–15). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2001). Principles of social justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, J. (2002). Interdisciplinarity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S. M., Cohen, J., Howard, M., & Nussmabum, M. C. (1999). Is multiculturalism bad for women?. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peled, Y. (2011). Language, rights, and the language and language rights: The need for a new conceptual framework in the political theory of language policy. Journal of Language and Politics, 10(3), 436–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peled, Y. (2012). Marching forward into the past: Monolingual multilingualism in contemporary political theory. In M. Hüning & U. Vogl (Eds.), Standard languages and multilingualism in European history (pp. 71–96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Réaume, D., & Pinto, M. (2012). Philosophy of language policy. In B. Spolsky (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of language policy (pp. 37–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Repko, A. F. (2011). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of sociolinguistics, 4(2), 196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2005a). Theoretical perspectives in language policy: An overview. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and methods (pp. 3–10). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2005b). Language policy: Theory and practice—An introduction. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and methods (pp. 10–24). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. (2005). Political theory and language policy research. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and methods (pp. 95–110). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, I. (forthcoming). Justice against domination. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (2009). Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spolsky, B. (2010). Ferguson and Fishman: Sociolinguistics and the sociology of language. In R. Wodak, B. Johnstone, & P. E. Kerswill (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 3–15). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1984). Spheres of justice: A defence of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M., & Miller, D. (1995). Pluralism, justice and equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wee, L. (2011). Language without rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, P. (2010). A short history of knowledge formations. In R. Frodeham, J. T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 3–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yael Peled.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peled, Y. Normative language policy: interface and interfences. Lang Policy 13, 301–315 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9325-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9325-z

Keywords

Navigation