Advertisement

Language Policy

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 351–369 | Cite as

Thinking about language: what political theorists need to know about language in the real world

  • Thomas RicentoEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Political theorists, generally non-experts in the language sciences, whose principal aim is often to advance normative theories on desirable states of affairs within liberal democratic states, tend to deal with language as a stable nominal category, as something that one ‘has’ or ‘doesn’t have’, that can be labeled as one thing (e.g., English) or another thing (e.g., French), that may be learned for defined purposes, that has instrumental and symbolic value, that is used principally as a modality for interpersonal communication, with ‘speakers’, possibly with associated geographic territories, and with cultural affiliations and traditions ‘attached’ to named languages and varieties. The fact that situated language practices and behaviors are far more complex and messier than this description suggests is often not taken into account by political philosophers engaged in normative theory construction that involves language(s). I argue in this paper that the complexities of language acquisition, use, and ascribed values need to be seriously taken into account by political philosophers in their theorizing about languages, which will impact how they think about and evaluate extant, or prospective, language policy approaches and frameworks.

Keywords

Language policy Political theory Language discrimination Language varieties 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abu-Laban, B., Derwing, T., Krahn, H., Mulder, M., & Wilkinson, L. (1999). The settlement experiences of refugees in Alberta. Prairie Centre of Excellence for Research on Immigration and Integration and Population Research Laboratory. Downloaded on March 13, 2009 from http://pcerii.metropolis.net/Virtual%20Library/RefugeeStudy/.
  2. Akabari, A. H. (1999). Immigrant “quality” in Canada: More direct evidence of human capital content. International Migration Review, 33, 156–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Appiah, K. A. (2005). The ethics of identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, C. (2006). Psycho-sociological analysis in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method (pp. 210–228). New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Baugh, J. (2003). Linguistic profiling. In S. Makoni, G. Smitherman, A. Ball, & A. Spears (Eds.), Black linguistics: Language, society, and politics in Africa and the Americas (pp. 155–168). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blommaert, J. (2008). Grassroots literacy: Writing, identity and voice in Central Africa. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruthiaux, P. (2003). Squaring the circles: Issues in modeling English worldwide. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N. (2012). The science of language: Interviews with James McGilvray. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernández, R. (1987). Legislation, regulation, and litigation: The origins and evolution of public policy on bilingual education in the United States. In W. A. Van Horne (Ed.), Ethncity and language (pp. 90–123). Milwaukee: The University of Wisconsin System Institute on Race and Ethnicity.Google Scholar
  14. Fought, C. (2006). Language and ethnicity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. General Social Surveys, 1972–1994: Cumulative Codebook. (1994, November). Conducted for the National Data Program for the Social Sciences at National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Haque, E. (2012). Multiculturalism within a bilingual framework: Language, race, and belonging in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, R. (1981). The language myth. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  18. Heller, M. (2011). Paths to post-nationalism: A critical ethnography of language and identity. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hopper, P. (1998). Emergent grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (pp. 155–175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Kachru, B. (1986). The alchemy of English: The spread, functions and models of non-Native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  21. Kymlicka, W. (1989). Liberalism, community, and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lippi-Green, R. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Lyons, J. (1990). The past and future directions of federal bilingual-education policy. In C. B. Cazden & C. E. Snow (Eds.), English plus: Issues in bilingual education, the annals (pp. 66–80). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 1–41). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  25. May, S. (2011). Language and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism and the politics of language (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Mill, J. S. (1861/1991). Considerations on representative government. In J. Gray (Ed.), On liberty and other essays (pp. 203–467). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Miner, S. (1998). Legal implications of the official English declaration. In T. Ricento & B. Burnaby (Eds.), Language and politics in the United States and Canada: Myths and realities (pp. 171–184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Otheguy, R., & Stern, N. (2010). On so-called Spanglish. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(1), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Patten, A., & Kymlicka, W. (2003). Introduction: Language rights and political Theory: Context, issues, and approaches. In W. Kymlicka & A. Patten (Eds.), Language rights and political theory (pp. 1–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Pita, M., & Utakis, S. (2002). Educational policy for the transnational Dominican community. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 1(4), 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Preston, D. (2009). Linguistic profiling: The linguistic point of view. In R. Salaberry (Ed.), Language allegiances and bilingualism in the US (pp. 53–79). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  32. Reitz, J. G. (2001). Immigrant skill utilization in the Canadian labour market: Implications of human capital research. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 2, 347–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rhodes, N. C., & Pufahl, I. (2010). Foreign language teaching in U.S. schools: Results of a national survey. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  34. Ricento, T. (1998). National language policy in the United States. In T. Ricento & B. Burnaby (Eds.), Language and politics in the United States and Canada: Myths and realities (pp. 85–112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Ricento, T. (2005). Problems with the ‘language-as-resource’ discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the U.S.A. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 9(3), 348–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ricento, T. (2008). Researching historical perspectives on language, education, and ideology. In K. King (Ed.), Research methods in language and education (Vol. 10), in N. Hornberger (general editor), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed.) (pp. 41–54). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Ricento, T. (2010). Language policy and globalization. In N. Coupland (Ed.), The Handbook of Language and Globalisation (pp. 123–141). London: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ricento, T. (2013). Dis-citizenship for refugees in Canada: The case of Fernando. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 12(3), 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rist, R. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 411–451.Google Scholar
  40. Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Stroud, C. (2010). A postliberal critique of language rights: Toward a politics of language for a linguistics of contact. In J. Petrovic (Ed.), International perspectives on bilingual education: Policy, practice, and controversy (pp. 195–221). Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Van Parijs, P. (2011). Linguistic justice for Europe & for the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Velez, C. M. (2006). A discourse analysis of the meanings of Hispanic and Latino in U.S. newspapers and interviews with academics and journalists. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, San Antonio. San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  44. Wee, L. (2005). Intra-language discrimination and linguistic human rights: The case of Singlish. Applied Linguistics, 26, 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wee, L. (2010). Neutrality in language policy. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 31(4), 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wee, L. (2011). Language without rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wiley, T. (2013). A brief history and assessment of language rights in the United States. In J. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (pp. 61–90). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Willinsky, J. (2000). Learning to divide the world: Education at empire’s end. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wright, L. (in press). Why English dominates the central economy: An economic perspective on ‘elite closure’ and South African language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), Language policy and political economy: English in a global context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Zentella, A. C. (1997). Growing up bilingual: Puerto Rican children in New York. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Werklund School of EducationUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations