Advertisement

Language Policy

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 101–119 | Cite as

Youth engaging language policy and planning: ideologies and transformations from within

  • Prem PhyakEmail author
  • Thuy Thi Ngoc Bui
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper explores language policy and planning from the perspectives of global ideologies, national agendas, and local transformation in two Asian countries, Vietnam and Nepal. Through engaged ethnography, we not only unravel complex ideological contestations of neoliberal and nationalistic agendas, but also portray language policy resistance and transformation through the voice of indigenous/minority youth. Drawing on two different historical and socio-political contexts, we first describe how language policies are guided by neoliberal ideologies and nationalistic agendas that increasingly misrecognize linguistic and cultural diversity in both countries. We then draw on engaged ethnographies to reveal how Nepalese and Vietnamese indigenous/minority youth interpret, resist, negotiate, and transform policies that fail to embrace their language and sociocultural identities. Together we argue for engaged language policy and planning in which indigenous/minority youth are critically involved in interpreting, re-envisioning, and transforming language policy on-the-ground.

Keywords

Language policy Globalization Neoliberalism Engaged ethnography Nepal Vietnam 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appadurai, A. (2006). The right to research. Globalization, Societies and Education, 4(2), 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apple, M. W. (2001). Educating the “Right” way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Awasthi, L. D. (2004). Exploring monolingual school practices in multilingual Nepal (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Copenhagen: Danish University of Education.Google Scholar
  4. Awasthi, L. D. (2008). Importation of ideologies: From Macaulay minutes to Wood Commission. Journal of Education and Research, 1(1), 21–30.Google Scholar
  5. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Block, D. (2004). Globalization, transnational communication and the internet. International Journal on Multicultural Societies (IJMS), 6(1), 13–28.Google Scholar
  7. Block, D., Gray, J., & Holborow, M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bui, T. N. T. (2009). Challenges of English language learning for Thai Minority students in Vietnam. Unpublished M.A thesis, College of Education, University of Hawaii at Manoa, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Bui, T. N. T. (2013). “Can a basket hide an elephant?”Language policy and practices toward linguistic, educational, and socio-economic equity in Vietnam. Doctoral dissertation, College of Education, University of Hawaii at Manoa, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Canagarajah, S. (Ed.). (2005). Reclaiming local in language policy and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2011). A holistic approach to multilingual education: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 339–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: Pedagogy for learning and teaching? The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 103–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00986.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In B. Street & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 71–83). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Cummins, J. (2010). Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics (CJAL)/Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée (RCLA), 10(2), 221–240.Google Scholar
  16. Dang, Q. A. (2009). Recent higher education reform in Vietnam: The role of the World Bank. Retrieved from www.dpu.dk/…/om-dpu_institutter_institut-for-paedagogik.
  17. Davies, A. (2009). Professional advice vs political imperatives. In C. Alderson (Ed.), The politics of language education: Individuals and institutions (pp.45–63). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, K. (2009). Agentive youth research: Towards individual, collective, and policy transformations. In T. G. Wiley, J. S. Lee, & R. Rumberger (Eds.), The education of language minority immigrants in the USA (pp. 202–239). London: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  19. Davis, K. A., Phyak, P., & Bui, T. T. N. (2012). Multicultural education as community engagement: Policies and planning in a transnational era. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 14(3). Available online at http://ijme-journal.org/index.php/ijme/article/view/625.
  20. Ed-Parks. (November 8, 2011). Vietnam demands English language teaching “miracle.” The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/nov/08/vietnam-unrealistic-english-teaching-goals.
  21. Ericson, D. (November, 2012). Expansion and status allure in Vietnamese higher education. Paper presented at the engaging with Vietnam conference (4th). Honolulu, HI, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Fairclough, N. (2006). Language and globalization. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  24. Garcia, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Giri, R. A. (2010). Cultural anarchism: The consequences of privileging languages in Nepal. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 31(1), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hayton, B. (2011). Vietnam: Rising dragon. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Heller, M. (2010). The commodification of language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heugh, K., Benson, C., Yohannes, M. A. G., & Bogale, B. (2012). Implications for multilingual education: Student achievement in different models of education in Ethiopia. In T. Skutnabb-Kangas & K. Heugh (Eds.), Multilingual education works: From the periphery to the centre (pp. 239–262). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Hornberger, N. H. (2002). Multilingual language policies and the continua of biliteracy: An ecological approach. Language Policy, 1(1), 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hornberger, N. (2006). Voice and biliteracy in indigenous language revitalization: Contentious educational practices in Quechua, Guarani, and Maori contexts. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 5(4), 277–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hornberger, N. H. (2010). Multilingual education policy and practice: Lessons from indigenous experience. Center for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/digest_pdfs/MultilingualEducationFinalWeb.pdf.
  33. Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2011). The ethnography of language policy. In T. L. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 273–289). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Hymes, D. H. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistic: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson, D. C. (2009). Ethnography of language policy. Language Policy, 8(2), 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kumar, D. (2000). What ails democracy in Nepal? In D. Kumar (Ed.), Domestic conflict and crisis of governability in Nepal. Kathmandu: Center for Nepal and Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  37. Luke, A. (2011). Generalizing across borders policy and the limits of educational science. Educational Researcher, 40(8), 367–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Madison, D. S. (2012). Critical ethnography: Methods, ethics, and performance (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. McCarty, T. L. (2006). Voice and choice in indigenous language revitalization. Journal of Language, Culture, and Identity, 5(4), 201–225.Google Scholar
  40. McCarty, T. L. (2011). Ethnography and language policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Nguyen, N. H. (2012). Vietnam’s national foreign language 2020 project: Overview and analysis. Paper presented at the engaging with Vietnam: An interdisciplinary dialogue conference (8–9 November), HI, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (Eds.). (2004). Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Pandey, D. R. (2012). The legacy of Nepal’s failed development. In S. von Einsiedel, D. M. Malone, & S. Pradhan (Eds.), Nepal in transition: From people’s war to fragile peace (pp. 81–99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Phillipson, R. (2012). Linguistic imperialism alive and kicking. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2012/mar/13/linguistic-imperialism-english-language-teaching.
  45. Phyak, P. (2011a). Beyond the façade of language planning for Nepalese primary education: Monolingual hangover, elitism and displacement of local languages? Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Phyak, P. (2011c). Debunking a few myths. The Kathmandu Post. http://www.ekantipur.com/2011/12/23/oped/debunking-a-few-myths/346002.html.
  47. Phyak, P. (2013). Language ideologies and local languages as the medium-of-instruction policy: A critical ethnography of a multilingual school in Nepal. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ritzer, G. (1993). The McDonaldization of society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.Google Scholar
  49. Schwind, B. (2010). Barriers to health care for the poor and ethnic minorities in Northwest Vietnam. Retrieved from http://www.socialsecurityextension.org/gimi/gess/RessShowRessource.do?ressourceId=16732.
  50. Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Skutnabb-Kangas, T., & Heugh, K. (2012). Multilingual education and sustainable diversity work: From periphery to center. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Spring, J. (2006). Pedagogies of globalization: The rise of the educational security state. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  53. Toba, S., Toba, I., & Rai, N. K. (2005). Diversity and endangerment of languages in Nepal. UNESCO Kathmandu series of monographs and working papers, No. 7. Retrieved on December 17, 2010, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001399/139952m.pdf.
  54. Van der Aa, J., & Blommaert, J. (2011). Ethnographic monitoring: Hymes’s unfinished business in educational research. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 42(4), 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wyman, L. T. (2009). Youth, linguistic ecology, and language endangerment: A Yup’ik example. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 8(5), 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yadava, Y. (August, 2007). Linguistic diversity in Nepal: Perspectives on language policy. A paper presented at an international seminar on constitutionalism and diversity in Nepal organized by Centre for Nepal and Asian Studies, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.Google Scholar
  57. Zhao, S. (2011). Actors in language in language planning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 905–923). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Second Language StudiesUniversity of Hawai’i at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.College of EducationUniversity of Hawai’i at ManoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations