Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Naivasha language policy: the language of politics and the politics of language in the Sudan

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Language Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article provides a textual analysis of the Naivasha language provisions in Sudan in an attempt to explore how political discourse is manifested in each policy statement. Using Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as an analytic and interpretive framework, the article argues that the Naivasha language provisions as political discourse are shaped by the historically mediated relationships between the south and north of Sudan (conceptualized as the territorially united entity before the secession of the south in 2011). In the course of the analysis, the article shows that the discourse of ‘linguistic indigenousness’ promoted by the policy is ideologically motivated. It is intertextual with the colonial Southern Policy and subsequently the discourse of self-determination as legislated in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement of 2005 that has recently heralded the emergence of the southern Sudan as a new nation-state. The analysis has shown that there is a high degree of compatibility between the proposed structural system and the discourse of the language policy. This compatibility is achieved at the status planning level, yet its realization at the practical level remains to be assessed. The article concludes by arguing that a particular version of federalism seems to be the most appropriate political system advocated for in the implementation of this language policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Rahim, M. (1965). Fourteen documents on the problem of the southern Sudan. Khartoum: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajulo, S. B. (1997). Myth and reality of law, language and international organisation in Africa: The case of African economic community. Journal of African Law, 41(1), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. (2008). Federalism: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beshir, M. O. (1968). The southern Sudan: Background to conflict. London: C. Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (Ed.). (1999). Language ideological debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bob, A., & Wassara, S. (1989). The emergence of the organised political movement in southern Sudan 1946–1972. In M. A. Al-Safi (Ed.), The nationalist movement in the Sudan (pp. 295–321). Khartoum: University of Khartoum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugarski, R. (2004). Language policies in the successor states of former Yugoslvaia. Journal of Language and Politics, 3(2), 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantori, L. J., & Lowrie, A. (1992). Islam, democracy, the state and the west. Summary of a lecture and round-table discussion with Hasan Turabi. Middle East Policy, 1(3), 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobarrubias, J. (1983). Ethical issues in status planning. In J. Cobarrubias & J. Fishman (Eds.), Progress in language planning (pp. 41–85). New York: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, F. (1984). Language and politics: Why does language matter to political philosophy? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, F. (1995). War of visions: Conflict of identities in the Sudan. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchene, A., & Heller, M. (Eds.). (2007). Discourses of endangerment: Ideology and interest in the defence of languages. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethnologue. (2010). http://www.ethnologue.com/show_country.asp?name=sudan.

  • Fabian, J. (1986). Language and colonial power: The appropriation of Swahili in the former Belgian Congo 1880–1938. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, M. (Ed.). (1989). Federalism and nationalism. Leicester: Leicester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, S. (1998). Multiplicity and contention among language ideologies: A commentary. In B. Schieffelin, K. Woolard, & P. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: practice and theory (pp. 317–332). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garang J. (1992). The call for democracy in Sudan, edited and introduced by M. Khalid, 2nd edn. London: Keagan Paul International.

  • Geis, M. L. (1987). The language of politics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (2008). Sudan: Majorities, minorities, and language interactions. In A. Simpson (Ed.), Language & national identity in Africa (pp. 61–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C. (2009). Ethnography of language policy. Language Policy, 8(2), 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J. E. (2006). Language and politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J. E., & Taylor, T. (Eds.). (1990). Language ideologies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, G. (1983). What can language planners learn from the Hispanic experience with corpus planning in the United States? In J. Cobarrubias & J. Fishman (Eds.), Progress in language planning (pp. 253–265). New York: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloss, H. (1971). Language rights of immigrant groups. International Migration Review, 5, 250–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Bianco, J. (2009). Critical discourse analysis (CDA) and language policy and planning (LPP): Constraints and applications of the critical in language planning. In T. Le, Q. Le, & M. Short (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 101–119). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macías, R. F. (1979). Language choice and human rights in the United States. In J. E. Alatis & G. R. Tucker (Eds.), Georgetown university round table on languages and linguistics (pp. 86–101). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmud, U. (1983). Arabic in the southern Sudan: History and spread of a pidgin-creole. Khartoum: FAL Advertising and Print Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (Eds.). (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, S. (2001). Language and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism, and the politics of language. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougal, M. S., Lasswell, H. D., & Chen, L. (1976). Freedom from discrimination in choice of language and international human rights. Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 1, 151–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. (2003). Linguistic policies and the issue of ethno-linguistic minorities in the Middle East. In A. Usuki & H. Kato (Eds.), Islam in the Middle Eastern studies: Muslims and minorities (pp. 149–174). JCAS symposium series 7, Osaka, Japan.

  • O’Leary, B. (2001). An iron law of nationalism and federation? A (neo-Diceyian) theory of the necessity of a federal Staatsvolk, and of consociational rescue. Nations and Nationalism, 7(3), 273–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelinka, A. (2007). Language as a political category: The viewpoint of political science. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(1), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2010). Language as a local practice. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L., & Jørgensen, M. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, R. (1990). Official languages and language planning. In K. L. Adams & D. T. Brink (Eds.), Perspectives on official English: The campaign for English as the official language of the USA (pp. 11–24). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, L., & Sanderson, N. (1981). Education, religion and politics in southern Sudan 1899–1964. London: Ithaca Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarino, A., & Papademetre, L. (2001). Ideologies, languages, policies: Australia’s ambivalent relationship with learning to communicate in ‘other’ languages. In J. Lo Bianco & R. Wickert (Eds.), Australian policy activism in language and literacy (pp. 305–325). Melbourne: Language Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H. (Eds.). (2001). The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey, H. (2008). Arab identity and ideology in Sudan: The politics of language, ethnicity and race. African Affairs, 107(426), 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 193–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. C. (1971). The significance of the Sudan in linguistic research: Past, present and future. In Y. F. Hasan (Ed.), Sudan in Africa (pp. 11–25). Khartoum: Khartoum University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Comprehensive peace agreement between the Government of the Republic of Sudan and the Sudan’s People’s Liberation Movement/Sudan People’s Liberation Army. (2005). Accessed August 24, 2010, from http://www.sd.undp.org/doc/CPA.pdf.

  • Tollefson, J. W. (1981). Centralised and decentralised language planning. Language Problems and Language Planning, 5(2), 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. W. (2002). Conclusion: Looking outward. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education (pp. 327–337). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. W. (2006). Critical theory in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tupas, T. R. (2003). History, language planners, and strategies of forgetting: The problem of consciousness in Philippines. Language Problems and Language Planning, 27(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. (1997). Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse and Society, 17(2), 359–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickert, R. (2001). Politics, activism and processes of policy production: Adult literacy in Australia. In J. Lo Bianco & R. Wickert (Eds.), Australian policy activism in language and literacy (pp. 67–84). Melbourne: Language Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (1992). Sociolinguistics: A sociological critique. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolard, K. (1998). Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In B. B. Schieffelin, K. Woolard, & P. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory (pp. 3–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolard, K. A., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3, 55–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2004). Language policy and language planning: From nationalism to globalisation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (2005). John Garang’s legacy to the peace process, the SPL/A and the south. Review of African Political Economy, 32(106), 535–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clare Hall College, University of Cambridge, Herschel Road, Cambridge, CB3 9AL, UK

    Ashraf Kamal Abdelhay

  2. Department of Applied Linguistics and African & African American Studies, College of the Liberal Arts, Pennsylvania State University, 305 Sparks Building, State College, PA, 16801, USA

    Busi Makoni & Sinfree Bullock Makoni

Authors
  1. Ashraf Kamal Abdelhay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Busi Makoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sinfree Bullock Makoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Busi Makoni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdelhay, A.K., Makoni, B. & Makoni, S.B. The Naivasha language policy: the language of politics and the politics of language in the Sudan. Lang Policy 10, 1–18 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9192-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9192-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation