Since the Shibboleth test of biblical times, language tests have been used as instruments of social policy. While there is an ongoing tradition of using language tests for purposes of identification of insiders and outsiders in situations of inflamed intergroup conflict, language proficiency tests are not normally thought of in this light. This paper explores the possibility of seeing such proficiency tests as weapons in the tradition of the Shibboleth test, and considers examples of tests designed to control the flow of immigrants and refugees and to determine access to education and employment in settings of intergroup competition.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Geoff Brindley Gillian Wigglesworth (Eds) (1997) access: Issues in English language test design and delivery National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University Sydney
Alan Davies (1997) Australian immigrant gatekeeping through English language tests: How important is proficiency? A. Huhta V. Kohonen L. Kurki-Suonio S. Luoma (Eds) Current developments and alternatives in language assessment University of Jyväskylä and University of Tampere Jyväskylä, Finland 71–84
Dan Douglas (2000) Assessing languages for specific purposes Cambridge University Press New York
Dutton, David (1998). Strangers and citizens: The boundaries of Australian citizenship 1901–1973. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Melbourne
Diana Eades Helen Fraser Jeff Siegel Tim McNamara Brett Baker (2003) ArticleTitleLinguistic identification in the determination of nationality: A preliminary report Language Policy 2 179–199 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024640612273
Elder, Catherine A. (1997a). The background speaker as learner of Italian, Modern Greek and Chinese: Implications for foreign language assessment. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Melbourne
Catherine A. Elder (1997b) ArticleTitleWhat does test bias have to do with fairness? Language Testing 14 261–277
InstitutionalAuthorNameInternational Language Testing Association (ILTA) (2000) ArticleTitleCode of ethics for ILTA Language Testing Update 27 14–22
Sally Jacoby (1998) Science as performance: Socializing scientific discourse through conference talk rehearsals University of California Los Angeles
Jones, Paul A. (1998). Alien acts: The White Australia Policy, 1901 to 1939. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Melbourne
Gary Kinsman (1996) The regulation of desire: Homo and hetero sexualities Black Rose Press Montreal
Gary Kinsman (2004) The Canadian Cold War on queers: Sexual regulation and resistance Cavell Richard (Eds) Love, hate and fear in Canada’s Cold War University of Toronto Press Toronto 108–132
InstitutionalAuthorNameLanguage and National Origin Group (2004) ArticleTitleGuidelines for the use of language analysis in relation to questions of national origin in refugee cases The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 11 261–266
Tim McNamara (1996) Measuring second language performance Addison-Wesley Longman London and New York
McNamara, Tim & Eades, Diana (2004). Linguistic identification of refugee claimants: a flawed test? Presentation in Invited Symposium ‘Enforcing citizenship policy through language tests’, American Association for Applied Linguistics Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, May
Samuel Messick (1989) Validity R. L. Linn (Eds) Educational measurement EditionNumber3 Macmillan New York 13–103
Anne Reath (2004) ArticleTitleLanguage analysis in the context of the asylum process: Procedures, validity, and consequences Language Assessment Quarterly 1 IssueID4 209–233
John Sawatsky (1980) Men in the shadows: The RCMP Security Service Doubleday Canada Toronto
Elana Shohamy (2001) The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests Pearson London
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mcnamara, T. 21st Century Shibboleth: Language Tests, Identity and Intergroup Conflict. Lang Policy 4, 351–370 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-005-2886-0
- Dictation Test
- language testing
- social competition