Often philosophers, logicians, and mathematicians employ a notion of intended structure when talking about a branch of mathematics. In addition, we know that there are foundational mathematical theories that can find representatives for the objects of informal mathematics. In this paper, we examine how faithfully foundational theories can represent intended structures, and show that this question is closely linked to the decidability of the theory of the intended structure. We argue that this sheds light on the trade-off between expressive power and meta-theoretic properties when comparing first-order and second-order logic.
Dutilh Novaes, C. (2019). Axiomatizations of arithmetic and the first-order/second-order divide. Synthese, 196(7), 2583–2597.
Ebbinghaus, H.-D., Flum, J., & Thomas, W. (1996). Einführung in die Mathematische Logik. Berlin: Spektrum Akademischer. 4. Auflage.
Hamkins, J.D., & Yang, R. (2013). Satisfaction is not absolute. arXiv:1312.0670v1 [math.LO].
Hintikka, J. (1989). Is there completeness in mathematics after gödel? Philosophical Topics, 17(2), 69–90.
Kennedy, J., Magidor, M., & Väänänen, J. (2021). Inner models from extended logics: Part 1. Journal of Mathematical Logic, 21(2), 2150012.
Lindström, P. (1969). On extensions of elementary logic. Theoria, 35(1), 1–11.
Maddy, P. (2019). What do we want a foundation to do? In S. Centrone, D. Kant, & D. Sarikaya (Eds.) Reflections on the foundations of mathematics: Univalent foundations, set theory and general thoughts (pp. 293–311). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Mostowski, A. (1952). On direct products of theories. Journal Symbolic Logic, 17(1), 1–31.
Presburger, M., & Jabcquette, D. (1991). On the completeness of a certain system of arithmetic of whole numbers in which addition occurs as the only operation. History and Philosophy of Logic, 12(2), 225–233.
Rav, Y. (2008). The axiomatic method in theory and in practice. Logique et Analyse, 51(202), 125–147.
Read, S. (1997). Completeness and categoricity: frege, Gödel and model theory. History and Philosophy of Logic, 18(2), 79–93.
Shapiro, S. (1991). Foundations without Foundationalism A Case for Second-order Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, S. (2001). Systems between first-order and second-order logics. In D.M. Gabbay F. Guenthner (Eds.) (pp. 131–187). Netherlands: Springer.
Tarski, A. (1968). Undecidable theories. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co.
Tarski, A. (1998). A decision method for elementary algebra and geometry. In B.F. Caviness J.R. Johnson (Eds.) Quantifier Elimination and Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition (pp. 24–84). Vienna: Springer.
Tennant, N. (2000). Deductive versus expressive power: A pre-Gödelian predicament. The Journal of Philosophy, 97(5), 257–277.
The Univalent Foundations Program. (2013). Homotopy Type Theory: Univalent Foundations of Mathematics. http://homotopytypetheory.org/book.
Väänänen, J. (2001). Second-order logic and foundations of mathematics. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 7(4), 504–520.
Order of authors is alphabetical. We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments on the paper. The first author is grateful to the VolkswagenStiftung for their support through the project Forcing: Conceptual Change in the Foundations of Mathematics. The second author is supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, grant agreement ERC-2014-CoG 648276 (AUTAR).
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Barton, N., Müller, M. & Prunescu, M. On Representations of Intended Structures in Foundational Theories. J Philos Logic 51, 283–296 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09628-2
- First-order logic
- Higher-order logic