Anderson, A.R., & Belnap, N.D. (1975). Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity volume 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Ayer, A.J. (1936). Language truth and logic. New York: Dover.
Google Scholar
Belnap, N.D. (1960). Entailment and relevance. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 25(2), 144–146.
Google Scholar
Bogen, J., & Woodward, J. (1988). Saving the phenomena. The Philosophical Review, 97(3), 303–352.
Google Scholar
Boghossian, P. (2000) In Paul Boghossian, C. P. (Ed.), Knowledge of logic, (pp. 229–254). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
BonJour, L. (1998). In defense of pure reason: a rationalist account of a priori justification. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Brouwer, L.E.J. (1907). Over de grondslagen der wiskunde. PhD thesis, Amsterdam. Extracts reprinted in Brouwer (1975), pp. 11-101.
Brouwer, L.E.J. (1908). De Onbetrouwbaarheid der logische principes. Tijdschrift voor wijsbegeerte, 2, 152–158. Reprinted in Brouwer (1975), pp. 107-111.
Google Scholar
Brouwer, L.E.J. (1948). Consciousness, philosophy and mathematics. In Beth, E.W., Pos, H.J., Hollak, J.H.A., Beth, EW, & et al. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 10th international congress of philosophy. North-Holland, Amsterdam. Reprinted in Brouwer (1975), pp. 480–494 (pp. 1235–1249). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Brouwer, L.E.J. (1975). Collected works: philosophy and foundation of mathematics Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Edited by A. Heyting.
Google Scholar
Brush, S.G. (1989). Prediction and theory evaluation: the case of light bending. Science, 246(4934), 1124–1129.
Google Scholar
Brush, S.G. (1994). Dynamics of theory change: The role of predictions. In PSA: proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association. Philosophy of Science Association (pp. 133–145).
Burgess, J.P. (1983). Common sense and “relevance”. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 24(1), 41–53.
Google Scholar
Carroll, J. (1994). Laws of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Cook, R. (2002). Vagueness and mathematical precision. Mind, 111(442), 225–48.
Google Scholar
Copeland, B.J. (1979). On when a semantics is not a semantics: some reasons for disliking the routley-meyer semantics for relevance logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(1), 399–413.
Google Scholar
Curry, H. (1942). The inconsistency of certain formal logics. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 7(3), 115–117.
Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (2000). Elements of intuitionism, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Evans, J. (2013). The psychology of deductive reasoning psychology revivals. London & New York: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1959). The foundations of arithmetic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Translated by J.L. Austin.
Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1979). Posthumous Writings. Oxford: Blackwell. Translated by P. Long and R. White, and edited by H. Hermes, F. Kambartel and F. Kaulbach.
Google Scholar
Gentzen, G. (1969). Untersuchungen Über das logische Schliessen, (Vol. 39. Translated in The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, ed. by M.E. Szabo, Nort Holland.
Glanzberg, M. (2015). Logical consequence and natural language. In Caret, C., & Hjortland, O. (Eds.) Foundations of logical consequence (pp. 71–120). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hitchcock, C., & Sober, E. (2004). Prediction verses accommodation and the risk of overfitting. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55(1), 1–34.
Google Scholar
Hjortland, O.T. (2017). Anti-exceptionalism about logic. Philosophical Studies, 174(3), 631–658.
Google Scholar
Hunt, J.C. (2012). On ad hoc hypotheses. Philosophy of Science, 79(1), 1–14.
Google Scholar
Jeshion, R. (2001). Frege’s notions of self-evidence. Mind, 110 (440), 937–976.
Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Translated and edited by Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood.
Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1979). Frege’s epistemology. The Philosophical Review, 88(2), 235–262.
Google Scholar
Kolodny, N., & MacFarlane, J. (2010). Ifs and oughts. The Journal of Philosophy, 107(3), 115–143.
Google Scholar
Kripke, S. (1975). Outline of a theory of truth. Journal of Philosophy, 72(19), 690–716.
Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1977). The essential tension university of chicago press. Chicago: IL.
Google Scholar
Lewis, C.L., & Langford, C.H. (1932). Symbolic logic. London: Dover Publications.
Google Scholar
Lipton, P. (1991). Inference to the best explanation. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
MacFarlane, J. (2000). What Does it Mean to Say that Logic is Formal? PhD thesis. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
Google Scholar
Martin, B. (2020). Identifying logical evidence. Synthese. Online first: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02618-yhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02618-y.
Martin, B., & Hjortland, O. (202X). Evidence in logic. In Routledge handbook of philosophy of evidence. London: Routledge.
McGee, V. (1985). A counterexample to modus ponens. Journal of Philosophy, 82(9), 462–471.
Google Scholar
McMullin, E. (2008). The virtues of a good theory. In Psillos, S., & Curd, M. (Eds.) The routledge companion to philosophy of science (pp. 498–508). London: Routledge.
Meyer, R.K. (1971). R-mingle and relevant disjunction. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 36(2), 366.
Google Scholar
Payette, G., & Wyatt, N. (2018). How do logics explain? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96(1), 157–167.
Google Scholar
Priest, G. (2006). In contradiction, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Priest, G. (2008). An introduction to Non-Classical logic, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Priest, G. (2014). Revising logic. In Rush, P. (Ed.) The Metaphysics of logic, chapter 12 (pp. 211–223). Cambridge: CUP.
Priest, G. (2016). Logical disputes and the a priori. Logique et Analyse, 59(236), 347–66.
Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1969). Is logic empirical?. In Cohen, R.S., & Wartofsky, M.W. (Eds.) Boston studies in the philosophy of science: proceedings of the Boston colloquium for the philosophy of science 1966/1968 (pp. 216–241). Dordrecht: Springer.
Quine, W. (1981). What price bivalence? The Journal of Philosophy, 78(2), 90–95.
Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1951). Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Review, 60(1), 20–43.
Google Scholar
Routley, R., & Meyer, R.K. (1972a). The semantics of entailment ii. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1(1), 53–73.
Google Scholar
Routley, R., & Meyer, R.K. (1972b). The semantics of entailment iii. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1(2), 192–208.
Google Scholar
Russell, G. (2015). The justification of the basic laws of logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 44(6), 793–803.
Google Scholar
Russell, G. (2017). Logic isn’t normative. Inquiry. Online first: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1372305.
Russell, G. (2018). Logical nihilism: Could there be no logic? Philosophical Issues, 28(1), 308–324.
Google Scholar
Russell, G. (2019). Deviance and vice: Strength as a theoretical virtue in the epistemology of logic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 99, 548–63. Online first: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/phpr.12498.
Google Scholar
Schindler, S. (2018). Theoretical virtues in science: uncovering reality through theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. (1998). Logical consequence: Models and modality. In Schirn, M. (Ed.) Philosophy of mathematics today: proceedings of an international conference in munich (pp. 131–156). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, S. (2000). The status of logic. In Peacocke, C., & Boghossian, P.A. (Eds.) New essays on the a priori (pp. 333–366). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, S. (2006). Vagueness in context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Strawson, P.F. (1950). On referring. Mind, 59(235), 320–344.
Google Scholar
Tennant, N. (2004). An anti-realist critique of dialetheism. In Priest, G., Beall, J., & Armour-Garb, B. (Eds.) The law of non-contradiction: new philosophical essays (pp. 355–384). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tennant, N. (2017). Core logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Weiner, J. (1990). Frege in perspective. Ithaca: Cornell university press.
Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness. London & New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2013). Modal logic as metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Williamson, T. (2017). Semantic paradoxes and abductive methdology. In Armour-Garb, B. (Ed.) The relevance of the liar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Woods, J. (2019). Logical partisanhood. Philosophical Studies, 176(5), 1203–1224.
Google Scholar
Worrall, J. (1989). Fresnel, poisson and the white spot: The role of successful predictions in the acceptance of scientific theories. In Gooding, D., Pinch, T., & Schaffer, S. (Eds.) The uses of experiment: studies in the natural sciences (pp. 135–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wright, C. (1986). Inventing logical necessity. In Butterfield, J. (Ed.) Language, mind, and logic (pp. 187–209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yalcin, S. (2012). A counterexample to modus tollens. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41(6), 1001–1024.
Google Scholar
Zardini, E. (2016). Restriction by noncontraction. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 57(2), 287–327.
Google Scholar