Skip to main content
Log in

Formal Epistemology

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Alchourròn, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., & Makinson, D. (1985). On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50, 510–530.

  2. Arló Costa, H., & Pedersen, A.P. (2012). Belief and probability: A general theory of probability cores. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 53(3), 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Briggs, R., Cariani, F., Easwaran, K., & Fitelson, B. (2014). Individual coherence and group coherence. In Lackey, J. (Ed.) Essays in Collective Epistemology: Oxford University Press.

  4. Chandler, J. (2010). The lottery paradox generalized The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(3), 667–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Finetti, B. (1974). Theory of Probability Vol. 1: Wiley.

  6. Douven, I., & Williamson, T. (2006). Generalizing the lottery paradox. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57(4), 755–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Easwaran, K. (ms). Dr. Truthlove, or, how I learned to stop worrying and love Bayesian probability. unpublished.

  8. Easwaran, K., & Fitelson, B. (2014). Accuracy, coherence, and evidence. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 5.

  9. Foley, R. (1993). Working Without a Net: A Study of Egocentric Epistemology. Oxford.

  10. Halpern, J. (2003). Reasoning about Uncertainty. MIT Press.

  11. Harman, G. (1986). Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. MIT Press.

  12. Hendricks, V., & Symons, J. (2006). Epistemic logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

  13. James, W. (1896). The will to believe. The New World, 5, 327–347.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jeffrey, R. (1965). The Logic of Decision. McGraw-Hill.

  15. Jeffrey, R. (1970). Dracula meets wolfman: Acceptance vs. partial belief In Swain, M. (Ed.), Induction, Acceptance, and Rational Belief: Dordrecht: Reidel.

  16. Joyce, J. (1998). A nonpragmatic vindication of probabilism. Philosophy of Science, 65(4), 575–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Keynes, J.M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability: Macmillan and co.

  18. Korb, K.B. (1992). The collapse of collective defeat: Lessons from the lottery paradox. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1, 230–236.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kyburg, H. (1961). Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. Wesleyan University Press.

  20. Kyburg, H. (1978). Subjective probability: Criticisms, reflections, and problems. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 7, 157–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kyburg, H. (1988). Full belief. Theory and Decision, 25, 137–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kyburg, H. (1992). Getting fancy with probability. Synthese, 90, 189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leitgeb, H. (2014). The stability theory of belief. The Philosophical Review, 123(2), 131–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Levi, I. (1967). Gambling with Truth: An Essay on Induction and the Aims of Science: Alfred A. Knopf.

  25. Lin, H., & Kelly, K. (2012). Propositional reasoning that tracks probabilistic reasoning. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41(6), 957–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Meyer, R.K. (1971). Entailment. The Journal of Philosophy, 68(21), 808–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramsey, F. P. (1926). Truth and probability In Braithwaite, R. B. (Ed.), The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays (1931): Harcourt, Brace and Company.

  28. Ross, J., & Schroeder, M. (2011). Belief, credence, and pragmatic encroachment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

  29. Savage, L.J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. Dover.

  30. Slaney, J. (1996). KD45 is not a doxastic logic. Technical Report TR-SRS-3-96, Australian National University.

  31. Smith, M. (2010). A generalised lottery paradox for infinite probability spaces. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(4), 821–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. van Fraassen, B. (1995). Fine-grained opinion, probability, and the logic of full belief. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24, 349–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Weatherson, B. (2005). Can we do without pragmatic encroachment Philosophical Perspectives, 19(1), 417–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenny Easwaran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Easwaran, K. Formal Epistemology. J Philos Logic 44, 651–662 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-015-9350-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-015-9350-1

Keywords

Navigation