References
Alchourròn, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., & Makinson, D. (1985). On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 50, 510–530.
Arló Costa, H., & Pedersen, A.P. (2012). Belief and probability: A general theory of probability cores. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 53(3), 293–315.
Briggs, R., Cariani, F., Easwaran, K., & Fitelson, B. (2014). Individual coherence and group coherence. In Lackey, J. (Ed.) Essays in Collective Epistemology: Oxford University Press.
Chandler, J. (2010). The lottery paradox generalized The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(3), 667–679.
De Finetti, B. (1974). Theory of Probability Vol. 1: Wiley.
Douven, I., & Williamson, T. (2006). Generalizing the lottery paradox. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57(4), 755–779.
Easwaran, K. (ms). Dr. Truthlove, or, how I learned to stop worrying and love Bayesian probability. unpublished.
Easwaran, K., & Fitelson, B. (2014). Accuracy, coherence, and evidence. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 5.
Foley, R. (1993). Working Without a Net: A Study of Egocentric Epistemology. Oxford.
Halpern, J. (2003). Reasoning about Uncertainty. MIT Press.
Harman, G. (1986). Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. MIT Press.
Hendricks, V., & Symons, J. (2006). Epistemic logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
James, W. (1896). The will to believe. The New World, 5, 327–347.
Jeffrey, R. (1965). The Logic of Decision. McGraw-Hill.
Jeffrey, R. (1970). Dracula meets wolfman: Acceptance vs. partial belief In Swain, M. (Ed.), Induction, Acceptance, and Rational Belief: Dordrecht: Reidel.
Joyce, J. (1998). A nonpragmatic vindication of probabilism. Philosophy of Science, 65(4), 575–603.
Keynes, J.M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability: Macmillan and co.
Korb, K.B. (1992). The collapse of collective defeat: Lessons from the lottery paradox. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1, 230–236.
Kyburg, H. (1961). Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. Wesleyan University Press.
Kyburg, H. (1978). Subjective probability: Criticisms, reflections, and problems. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 7, 157–180.
Kyburg, H. (1988). Full belief. Theory and Decision, 25, 137–162.
Kyburg, H. (1992). Getting fancy with probability. Synthese, 90, 189–203.
Leitgeb, H. (2014). The stability theory of belief. The Philosophical Review, 123(2), 131–171.
Levi, I. (1967). Gambling with Truth: An Essay on Induction and the Aims of Science: Alfred A. Knopf.
Lin, H., & Kelly, K. (2012). Propositional reasoning that tracks probabilistic reasoning. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41(6), 957–981.
Meyer, R.K. (1971). Entailment. The Journal of Philosophy, 68(21), 808–818.
Ramsey, F. P. (1926). Truth and probability In Braithwaite, R. B. (Ed.), The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays (1931): Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Ross, J., & Schroeder, M. (2011). Belief, credence, and pragmatic encroachment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Savage, L.J. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. Dover.
Slaney, J. (1996). KD45 is not a doxastic logic. Technical Report TR-SRS-3-96, Australian National University.
Smith, M. (2010). A generalised lottery paradox for infinite probability spaces. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(4), 821–831.
van Fraassen, B. (1995). Fine-grained opinion, probability, and the logic of full belief. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 24, 349–377.
Weatherson, B. (2005). Can we do without pragmatic encroachment Philosophical Perspectives, 19(1), 417–443.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Easwaran, K. Formal Epistemology. J Philos Logic 44, 651–662 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-015-9350-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-015-9350-1