The paper is concerned with a logical difficulty which Lionel Shapiro’s deflationist theory of logical consequence (as well as the author’s favoured, non-deflationist theory) gives rise to. It is argued that Shapiro’s non-contractive approach to solving the difficulty, although correct in its broad outlines, is nevertheless extremely problematic in some of its specifics, in particular in its failure to validate certain intuitive rules and laws associated with the principle of modus ponens. An alternative non-contractive theory is offered which does not suffer from the same problem.
KeywordsContraction Curry’s paradox Entailment Logical consequence Modus ponens Transparent truth
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Beall, J. C., & Murzi, J. (2012). Two flavors of Curry’s paradox. The Journal of Philosophy, forthcoming.Google Scholar
- 3.Brady, R. (2003). Prologue. In Brady, R. (Ed.), Relevant logics and their rivals (Vol. II, pp. 1–9). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- 12.Restall, G. (1994). On logics without contraction. PhD thesis, Department of Philosophy, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
- 15.Weir, A. (2005). Naive truth and sophisticated logic. In Armour-Garb, B., & Beall, J. C. (Eds.), Deflationism and paradox (pp. 218–249). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 17.Zardini, E. (2008). Living on the slippery slope. The nature, sources and logic of vagueness. PhD thesis, Department of Logic and Metaphysics, University of St. Andrews.Google Scholar
- 18.Zardini, E. (2009). Towards first-order tolerant logics. In Prozorov, O. (Ed.), Philosophy, mathematics, linguistics: Aspects of interaction (pp. 35–38). St. Petersburg: Russian Academy of Science Press.Google Scholar
- 20.Zardini, E. (2012a). First-order tolerant logics. The Review of Symbolic Logic, forthcoming.Google Scholar
- 21.Zardini, E. (2012). Getting one for two, or the contractors’ bad deal. Towards a unified solution to the semantic paradoxes. In Achourioti, T., Fujimoto, K., Galinon, H., & Martínez, J. (Eds.), volume on truth. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar